Finanzmarkt- und Konzernmacht-Zeitalter der Plutokratie unterstützt von der Mediakratie in den Lobbykraturen der Geld-regiert-Regierungen in Europa, Innsbruck am 07.04.2016
Bewusstheit, Liebe und Friede sei mit uns allen und ein gesundes sinnerfülltes Leben wünsch ich ebenfalls.
Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGzBUGZ3CnA&feature=youtu.be
9/11 erklärt von Dr.Judy Wood Episode 3: Zerstaubung Dustification
Ein bemerkenswert-interessanter Rückblick, auf den 11. Sept. 2001, mit Perspektiven die bislang weitgehend und bestmöglich verschleiert werden konnten.
Erfolgt eine Betrachtung durch die Fensterglas-Brillen der konzernhörigen Klatschaffen und der staatsparteilichen Presseorgane, kann man deren journalistische Bestleistung wahrsch. am ehesten mit dem Wort „erbärmlich“ zusammenfassen. Schauen wir jedoch durch die Mikroskope der vielen unterschiedlichen und freien Recherchen, offenbart sich ein völlig anderes, bisweilen auch erschreckendes Bild.
Die akribischen Recherchen von Dr. Judy Wood, heben trotz programmiertem Gegenwind die dubiosen Ereingnisse noch einmal auf eine andere Ebene und lassen die Vorgänge hinsichtlich 9/11 in einem völlig anderen Licht erscheinen.
In diesem Bericht geht es speziell um die regelrechte Auflösung der World Trade Center – Gebäude 1,2 und 7, die nach Einschätzung von Dr. J. Wood nicht eingestürzt sind, sondern bereits im freien Fall zerstäubt (worden) sind. Es bleiben Fragen, wie: Wo sind die Türme hin? Wo ist der Beton und der gesamte Stahl geblieben? Diese Materialmassen hätten sich doch viel massiver auftürmen müssen…
Übersetzung: www.aTuM.media, Klee-Moe & Frank Stoner (Radio Emergency)
Geheime Technologie und 9/11- Dr Judy Wood | Amok Alex & Frank Stoner Show No 30/2015
Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3Rdd-lW-5E
KenFM zeigt: Vortrag von Richard Gage in der Berliner Urania (englisch)
„Der smarte Weg, um Menschen passiv und gefügig zu halten, ist, das Spektrum der akzeptierten Meinung strikt zu limitieren, gleichzeitig aber eine lebhafte Diskussion darin zuzulassen.“
Diese von Noam Chomsky beschriebene Methode, um elementare Fragen gar nicht erst aufkommen zu lassen, beziehungsweise Zweifel bereits im Keim zu ersticken, wird in den letzten Jahren auf kein Ereignis stärker angewandt als auf die Geschehnisse des 11. September 2001.
Der amerikanische Architekt Richard Gage, Mitglied der Organisation „Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth“, lässt sich nicht einschüchtern und reist seit Jahren um die Welt, um seine kritischen Fragen zu den Terroranschlägen einer breiteren Masse zu stellen. Wir zeigen am heutigen 14. Jahrestag von 9/11 die Aufzeichnung seines englischsprachigen Vortrages in der Berliner Urania.
Richard Gage, Gründer von „Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth“ erörtert Beweise für die Zerstörung des WTC-Gebäudes Nr. 7 durch eine „kontrollierte Sprengung“ in C-SPANs „Washington Journal“ vom 1. August 2014.
Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: http://www.ae911truth.org
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions — Here you will find some answers to some of the most commonly asked questions about the destruction of the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.
As each FAQ response is published in our newsletter and posted on our website, it will be added to this page.
FAQ #1: WHO DEMOLISHED THE TWIN TOWERS AND BUILDING 7 AND WHY?
We do not know who the perpetrators of this crime are. Identifying the culprits is the purpose of a real criminal investigation. However, we are able to provide overwhelming evidence of a cover-up of this crime. In addition, scientific forensic evidence indicates that only individuals who could gain long-term access inside the highly secure WTC skyscrapers and obtain advanced thermitic materials could have orchestrated the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7.A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #2: WHAT ABOUT THE PLANES THAT SLAMMED INTO THE TWIN TOWERS? WOULDN’T THEY HAVE DISTURBED THE DEMOLITION DEVICES?
Some of the demolition devices were undoubtedly disturbed by the plane impacts, but not enough to prevent the rest of the devices from performing adequately. Even the NIST report states that the collapse of the North Tower started on a floor with fairly minor structural damage.A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #3: WHAT’S YOUR ASSESSMENT OF THE DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON (DEW) HYPOTHESIS?
The DEW hypothesis is not supported by the forensic evidence, nor can it explain the available evidence, including the molten iron microspheres documented by USGS and RJ Lee, the molten metal at Ground Zero and the active thermitic material discovered in the WTC dust. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #4: WHY WEREN’T THE SOUNDS THAT WERE HEARD DURING THE DESTRUCTION OF THE WTC SKYSCRAPERS ON 9/11 AS LOUD AS THE BLASTS HEARD IN VIDEOS OF KNOWN CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS?
Many sounds of explosions were in fact heard at the WTC on 9/11, and their continuous and rapid nature would make individual explosions very difficult to hear. In addition, thermite incendiary materials, which were identified in the WTC dust, create less noise than conventional explosives. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #5: WHAT CAUSED THE ISOLATED HIGH-SPEED EJECTIONS OF PULVERIZED DUST AND DEBRIS FROM THE TOWERS?
Video evidence shows that these ejections were composed of pulverized building materials, and they occurred at isolated, geometrically precise locations, in an engineered pattern which are attributable to explosives – not air pressure from above. In addition, the ejection speeds were too high to have been caused by the pressure of the collapsing structure above. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #6: WHY DOES AE911TRUTH REPRESENT ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS?
Most architects and engineers have never been presented with the scientific evidence of controlled demolition. In addition, most of those who take the time to examine this evidence acknowledge that the official story can’t be true. As of the date of this publication, there are almost 1,700 architects and engineers who openly support the findings of AE911Truth vs. only a few dozen who have openly supported the NIST WTC reports. Even so, in the end, the evidence stands on its own, regardless of how many professionals are aware of it. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #7: AREN’T THE RED-GRAY CHIPS IDENTIFIED IN THE WTC DUST MERELY PRIMER PAINT FROM THE WTC STEEL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS?
Key ingredients of the primer paint are not present in the chemical composition of the red-gray chips – and vice versa. More importantly, scientific tests have revealed that the red-gray chips ignite at 430º C, creating molten iron as a reaction product – characteristics that confirm they are thermitic material and not primer paint. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #8: WHAT IS NANOTHERMITE? COULD IT HAVE BEEN USED TO DEMOLISH THE WTC TOWERS?
Thermite is a mixture of a metal and the oxide of another metal that produces temperatures well in excess of 4000° F when ignited, certainly high enough to allow cuts through the structural steel of the Twin Towers. Nanothermite is a nano-engineered variant of thermite that can be formulated to be explosive, intensifying its destructive power. Residues of thermite and nanothermite were discovered in the WTC dust, which indicates they were used to destroy the WTC skyscrapers. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #9: WERE THE TWIN TOWERS DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE IMPACT OF THE AIRPLANES?
Yes. Airplane impact tests that were conducted during the design of the Twin Towers showed that the skyscrapers would withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, which has more energy upon impact than the 767 aircraft that crashed into the Twin Towers on 9/11. In the following years, lead WTC structural engineer John Skilling, WTC structural engineer Leslie Robertson and WTC construction manager Frank Demartini made statements that underscore that analysis. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ # 10: DID WTC 7 OWNER LARRY SILVERSTEIN ADMIT TO ORDERING THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDING?
Larry Silverstein’s “pull it” statement is so cryptic and vague that it is impossible to know for sure what he was referring to. However, according to Fox News journalist Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, Silverstein tried to get approval to demolish WTC 7 on the afternoon of 9/11. Even though Silverstein’s statements have no bearing on the scientific evidence that proves WTC 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition, he should still be questioned in a future WTC investigation.
A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #11: DOES THE NIST WTC 7 COMPUTER ANIMATION OF THE COLLAPSE PROVE THAT THE SKYSCRAPER CAME DOWN BY FIRE?
No. The NIST WTC 7 computer animation of the collapse does not even closely resemble the observations and actual video footage of the destruction in three main ways. A scientifically valid explanation of any phenomenon must account for the key observations. Moreover, a computer simulation does not constitute an explanation. It is merely a tool for determining and visualizing what might have happened if various assumptions are true. NIST has refused to disclose the computer inputs of its mathematical models. This makes it impossible for anyone to check their work. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #12: WHERE ARE THE 9/11 WHISTLEBLOWERS?
Many of those who cannot accept the scientific evidence that refutes the official story of the collapse of the three WTC towers on 9/11/2001 argue, „If 9/11 was an inside operation, surely at least one whistleblower would have come forward by now. You couldn’t keep something like that secret.“ While at first blush this argument might seem to be logical, closer examination shows that it makes no sense. Since scientific evidence has clearly shown that the official explanation for the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers cannot be true, the theory that the official story must be true because there have been „no 9/11 whistleblowers“ is entirely specious. A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #13: WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF THE WTC SKYSCRAPERS?
Arguably, no question surrounding 9/11 arouses more intense interest than this one. An investigation of 9/11 will certainly not be complete until we know who perpetrated the crimes and until they are brought to justice. Crime scene investigators know that, „Physical evidence cannot be wrong; it cannot perjure itself; it cannot be wholly absent. Only its interpretation can err.“ (Paul Kirk, Crime Investigation) A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #14: WHAT WAS THE MOLTEN METAL SEEN POURING OUT OF THE SOUTH TOWER MINUTES BEFORE ITS COLLAPSE — STEEL AND IRON, OR ALUMINUM AND/OR LEAD?
Liquid metal was seen pouring out of the South Tower during the final seven minutes before its collapse on September 11, 2001. Was it a combination of steel and iron, or was it aluminum and/or lead? What was the molten metal reported under the rubble of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero? And why is the identification of the molten metal important? A more detailed answer is available here.
FAQ #15: VARIOUS AUTHORS CLAIM THAT NUCLEAR BLASTS CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. WHY DOES AE911TRUTH NOT ENDORSE THIS CLAIM?
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is not aware of any evidence that supports the claim that nuclear blasts occurred at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. AE911Truth does not endorse that claim, nor does it endorse any theories resulting from it, nor does it link to websites and publications where such theories are promoted, for the reasons given below. A more detailed answer is available here.
On September 11, 2001, the three worst structural failures in modern history took place when World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 suffered complete and rapid destruction.
In the aftermath of the tragedy, most members of the architecture and engineering community, as well as the general public, assumed that the buildings’ destruction had occurred as a result of the airplane impacts and fires. This view was reinforced by subsequent federal investigations, culminating in FEMA’s 2002 Building Performance Study and in the 2005 and 2008 reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Since 9/11, however, independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires caused the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. This body of evidence, most of which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, instead supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as “controlled demolition,” where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building.
- Rapid onset of destruction,
- Constant acceleration at or near free-fall through what should have been the path of greatest resistance,
- Numerous eyewitness accounts of explosions including 118 FDNY personnel,
- Lateral ejection of multi-ton steel framing members distances of 600 feet at more than 60 mph,
- Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete, and large volumes of expanding pyroclastic-like dust clouds,
- Isolated explosive ejections 20 to 60 stories below the “crush zone,”
- Total destruction and dismemberment of all three buildings, with 220 floors each an acre in size missing from the Twin Towers’ debris pile,
- Several tons of molten steel/iron found in the debris piles,
- Evidence of thermite incendiaries on steel beams,
- Nanothermite composites and iron microspheres found in WTC dust samples.
Articles by AE911Truth
The following articles discuss and analyze the evidence for explosive controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. While most of these articles are intended for a general audience, the articles under “Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports” are geared toward readers with greater technical knowledge.
- 60 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11
World Trade Center Building 7
- Evidence for the Explosive Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11
- Freefall and Building 7 on 9/11
- How Did They Know? Examining the Foreknowledge of Building 7’s Destruction
- Twin Towers Evidence Blows Away Fire Collapse Theory
- Lack of Deceleration of North Tower’s Upper Section Proves Use of Explosives
- What was the Molten Metal Seen Pouring Out of the South Tower Minutes Before its Collapse?
- High Temperatures, Persistent Heat & ‚Molten Steel‘ at WTC Site Contradict Official Story
- Billions of Previously Molten Iron Spheres in WTC Dust, Reveal Use of Thermitic Materials
- Advanced Pyrotechnic or Explosive Material Discovered in WTC Dust
- Evidence Destroyed is Justice Denied
Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports
- 25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
- The NIST Analyses – A Close Look at WTC 7
- How NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel
Critique of Popular Mechanics
The Psychology of 9/11
- Psychology Experts Speak Out: “Why is the 9/11 Evidence Difficult for Some to Accept?”
- Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11? A 20-Part Series
Other Technical Articles
Documentaries and Videos — The Evidence: Implausibility of the Official Story Surrounding Building 7’s Collapse
IMPLAUSIBILITY OF THE OFFICIAL THEORY
The official theory of Building 7’s collapse is shown to be implausible by the inability of the official theory’s authors to generate a computer model of the collapse that even remotely resembles the observed collapse. Read More
Perhaps the most important piece of evidence that Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition is the building’s downward acceleration at absolute free-fall, with sudden onset, for the first few seconds of its collapse. Read more
Appendix C of FEMA’s 2002 Building Performance Study documented the existence of several beams from World Trade Center Building 7 that had experienced a “severe high temperature corrosion attack.” The New York Times called this “perhaps the deepest mystery… Read more
A sampling of eyewitness accounts of explosions just before and during Building 7’s collapse.
“And, at the last few seconds, he took his hand off [the radio] and you heard “3-2-1”, and he was just saying, ‘Just run for your life, just run for your life.’ Read more
FOREKNOWLEDGE OF COLLAPSE
The sudden and total collapse of Building 7 at approximately 5:20 p.m. on 9/11 astonished the engineering community. The New York Times reported: “Engineers and other experts…were for weeks still stunned by what happened with World Trade Center 7…’ We know what happened at 1 and 2… Read more
IMPLAUSIBILITY OF THE OFFICIAL THEORY
The official account of the Twin Towers’ destruction was produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and released in September of 2005. Unfortunately, NIST’s report only provided a hypothesis of the events leading up to the initiation of the collapses… Read more
The rapid and complete destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers, ostensibly by causes other than controlled demolition, was an unprecedented event in the history of high-rise construction. Although theoretically possible, collapses of heavily constructed buildings like the Twin Tower… Read more
PULVERIZATION AND EJECTION OF CONTENTS
A striking feature of the Twin Towers’ destruction was the pulverization of most of the concrete into gravel and dust before it hit the ground. This is evident from the explosive mushrooming of the towers into vast clouds of concrete as they fell, and from the fact that virtually no large pieces of concrete… Read more
EXTREME TEMPERATURES AND INCENDIARIES
Extremely high temperatures were evident before and after the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. These extremely high temperatures contradict the official story because office and hydrocarbon fires burning in open air (~500° to 1,500° F) cannot reach temperatures… Read more
A collection of eyewitness accounts describing phenomena indicative of controlled demolition. These quotes and accompanying description are drawn from the article, “Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories,” by Dr. D
WHO WE ARE
Dan Barnum, FAIA, of Houston, Texas, holds a Bachelor of Architecture degree from Rice University. He has been practicing architecture for the past 40 years and has designed a variety of buildings, from houses to high-rise office buildings. Among his major projects are One Shell Plaza and Two Shell Plaza in downtown Houston, and Houston Lighting and Power, which is now the Houston Public Works office building. Barnum is a Fellow of the American Institute of Architects, the highest honor bestowed on its members by the AIA.
Dan “knew” at the outset that something was fishy about 9/11, because both of the buildings collapsed suddenly, and in the same manner.
Tom Spellman has an undergraduate degree in architecture (with a minor in civil engineering) from the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. He also managed a housing co-op for 15 years and was an accountant for five years. An Internet discussion about 9/11 in late 2002 convinced him that the official story was a fraud. Upon hearing Dr. Steven Jones state that random fires and damage could not produce a symmetrical collapse, he understood that explosives had to be involved. He contacted Richard Gage to clarify technical points made during a presentation and was invited to join the weekly team calls as a volunteer. He has served as Treasurer ever since.
Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect of 25 years, a member of the American Institute of Architects, and the founder and CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Mr. Gage has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed, steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, a parking structure, and 320,000 square feet of mid-rise office space.
Kelly David received a Bachelor of Science degree from New York Institute of Technology in 2002 and immediately launched her career in management. Over the next 11 years, she helped organize the day-to-day operations of several businesses in New York, where she grew up, then moved to the San Francisco Bay area, where she currently resides. In early 2013, after watching AE911Truth’s „Experts Speak Out“ and being bothered by the anomalies the film presented, she joined the group as a volunteer. By April of that year, her management expertise had propelled her into the role of assistant to CEO Richard Gage. After effectively managing the organization’s back-end operations for several months, she was named COO by the board. In the spring of 2015, the board named Kelly a director. Her business motto: „In order to take the first step to success, you need a strong organizational structure on which to stand. I’m grateful to have that structure here!“
„To me, 9/11 is the key. You open that door, and it’s a floodgate. You can then challenge all the other issues. Once you question the authority for the government’s illegal actions, you’re ready to reshape the country back to the way it was founded — based on individual liberty.“ — Dave Meiswinkle
„What could cause this range of recovered body parts from nearly complete to essentially ‚vaporized‘? Perhaps it was proximity to explosives?“ — Matt Campbell
„Something smells fishy about the official report.“ . . . „It’s obviously a controlled demolition, so why did they lie about it?“ — Comments from two architects who now support a new investigation of Building 7
“The truth is, before 9/11, the term global collapse didn’t even exist. Buildings survived fires, plane crashes, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, botched demolitions and even nuclear explosions. Never, before or after 9/11, have we seen such catastrophic failures.” MacQueen
„If you start evoking their high school physics, they just tune out. But if you can say, look, this was a cop who was on the scene, and he says there was an explosion that was so strong it picked him up and threw him across the concourse — well, they can relate to that.“ — Graeme MacQueen
True sociopaths cannot feel close to or connected with other humans or creatures. . . . They are the “monsters” in our midst who are capable of enacting atrocities such as 9/11.
„This is the environment for expressing the technical aspects of 9/11 — the place to invite all sides and to discuss all sides. That’s part of our education.“ — Professor Jay Kappraff
Chris Mohr, the lone believer in the official conspiracy, was in the crowd. He has spent considerable time debating AE911Truth at various venues, including this venue.
“That’s the hardest part of the work for us — getting people to open their mind and to accept another reality.” — Rick Trevino
„You’ll see for yourself a transformation of awareness in the students. They will quickly get it. And when they do, their professors — at least those who stubbornly cling to the official story — may be in trouble.“ — Richard Gage
„I’m an optimist. I like to believe that someone didn’t put a bunch of explosives somewhere in the building and it fell down. But can I say know that with 100 percent certainty? I can’t.“ — A visitor to the AE911Truth booth at the Structural Engineering Summit
If enough of the world’s population does not awaken to the reality of false flags and other deceits propagated by the powerful, and in turn confront these perpetrators, we are, in essence, inviting more of the same.
„Thankfully, you came out with your campaign on Building 7. I’ve been saying, I don’t know how anybody can see that and afterwards still believe what they tell us!“
We have scrutinized what has been presented in various publications as evidence that nuclear blasts occurred at the WTC, but found none of the arguments substantiated.
„We realized that if the people who govern this national association of architects didn’t even know the official explanation for the total collapse of a 47-story skyscraper, then there was truly a lot of misinformation out there — and it had to be corrected. So, ever since the convention, one of our major goals with the booklet has been to educate readers about what the official hypothesis of fire-induced failure actually says, so we can accurately compare and contrast it with the controlled demolition hypothesis.“ — Ted Walter
For those in the 9/11 Truth Movement who need the specific points of support for their WTC debates, AE911Truth has come up with a powerful tool — the individualized chapters of Experts Speak Out — now available on YouTube.
“The truth is, before 9/11, the term global collapse didn’t even exist. Buildings survived fires, plane crashes, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, botched demolitions and even nuclear explosions. Never, before or after 9/11, have we seen such catastrophic failures.”
„If a conference such as SEFI 2015 cannot address the ethical lapses of the engineering peer review process, what venues are available to demand that engineers adhere to the ideals embodied in their various codes of ethics?“ — Wayne Coste and Michael Smith
„Any time you can take the censors out of the equation and speak directly to the people you want to reach, the more control you have over the situation and the stronger the impact of your message will be.“ — Andrew Steele
The Truth Truck is „a handsome and compelling reminder of what many in society unconsciously suspect but do not dwell upon or act upon — namely, that there are shadowy forces behind our democratic process that maneuver foreign and military policy, in particular, for reasons of imperialism and profit.“ — Elizabeth Woodworth
„I was trying to appeal to the emotional side of these people, to their integrity, to the things that have brought them to the profession of architecture.“ — Richard Wallace
What if this showed up in your mailbox?
„[T]hey had better not publish anything that challenges the idea that America is fundamentally good, the exceptional nation, because this is the one religious belief that cannot be challenged.“ — David Ray Griffin
As they travel, Meiswinkle and Senzee will be filming a documentary, in which they hope to bring out the crucial — as well as inspiring and uplifting — message that our inherent rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are unalienable, inviolate, and are core to all peoples on earth.
NIST’s official „normal office fire“ explanation for the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 does not explain the 47-story tower’s stunning implosion and free-fall acceleration. That’s because NIST has ignored the data thatdoes explain these extraordinary features — the evidence of controlled demolition.
If a person’s false self includes identification with America as a country of unequivocal goodness, then to be exposed to information suggesting that America is in fact an imperialistic aggressor . . . is to have one’s self-image seriously challenged.
According to this new hypothetical scenario, a fire in the northeast section (near column #79) of Floor 12 heated the beams of the floor above it, causing them to expand a few inches, and then . . . .
When such a vulnerable person hears the evidence that 9/11 skeptics present, he . . . may become silent and unresponsive as though disoriented, so that he appears „spacey.“
Prof. James Tracy emphasizes that abuse of citizens by governments has reached the point of a „grave societal malady.“
NIST’s fairy tales about these two contributing factors to the collapse — the trusses and a diesel fire — were clearly as ill-founded as the story about the non-existent 10-story gouge.
„Hey Anderson (CNN) . . . what about the real story? How come buildings only fall at free fall on 9/11?“
We believe that the State of New Jersey . . . can conduct an investigation into 9/11 if the legislators so desire and if law enforcement would do their job.
How could all 47 core columns fail at the same instant? Fires could not do that.
Editor’s Note: This fascinating and provocative technical piece on NIST’s manipulation of the WTC 7 evidence is broken down into a series of six articles. The third installment, below, is PART 2: NIST’s Fictitious Gouge Launches Design Flaw Myth and Collapse Initiation Theory. The first installment was the INTRODUCTION. The second installment was PART 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth About WTC 7’s „Scooped-Out“ 10 Stories. Stand by for the next three installments, to be published monthly.
Learned helplessness is associated with subsequent depression, anxiety, phobias, shyness, and/or loneliness.
Last chance for a year-end tax-deductable charitable gift for your favorite educational 501c3 non-profit.
Editor’s Note: This fascinating and provocative technical piece on NIST’s manipulation of the WTC 7 evidence is broken down into a series of six articles. The second installment (below) is PART 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth About WTC 7’s „Scooped-Out“ 10 Stories. The first installment was theINTRODUCTION. Stand by for the next four installments, to be published monthly.
An historic milestone in the 9/11 Truth Movement has been achieved by a dedicated group of activists in Ottawa, Ontario, with the presentation of a petition in the House of Commons requesting a „parliamentary review of the omissions and inconsistencies in the official United States of America 9/11 Commission Report.“
>SIGN THE PETITION
Over 2,300 architects and engineers and nearly 20,000 other supporters have signed the petition demanding a truly independent WTC investigation. Add your name!
STAY UP TO DATE
>GET INVOLVED WITH AE911TRUTH
You can make a real difference in helping AE911Truth achieve its mission by getting involved as a volunteer. We encourage you to join one of our core volunteer teams listed below, or join a Local Action Group in your area, orcontact us if there is another way you would like to help.
INTERNET TECHNOLOGY TEAM
The purpose of the Internet Technology Team is to build and maintain our online presence.
The purpose of the Writing Team is to publish technical articles, news updates, and other written materials.
The purpose of the Verification Team is to verify the credentials of each of our architect and engineer petition signers – an essential function for growing AE911Truth.
The purpose of the Translation Team is to translate AE911Truth’s materials into other languages so that our reach extends worldwide.
The purpose of the Presenters Team is to give live presentations across the U.S. and around the world, directly educating members of the architecture and engineering professions as well as the general public.
NATIONAL ORGANIZING TEAM
The purpose of the Grassroots Organizing Team is to coordinate and support the efforts of Local Action Groups across the U.S. and around the world. .
Anthony Freda — who has contributed provocative political art to publications like The New York Times, Time,Rolling Stone, Esquire, The New Yorker, and Playboy — says he has no idea why the museum would accept his painting, titled „9-11 Questions.“
Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: „Why Do Good People Become Silent — or Worse — About 9/11?“ The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.
Sometimes the truth about 9/11 shows up in the oddest places.
|I. ESO Final Edition Promo Materials
|IV.Video & Audio
|I. ESO Final Edition Promo Materials
The above press release is ready to be customized for your location
The above press release for the AE911Truth 30+ city tour is ready to be customized for your stop
The above press release for a locally hosted screening is ready to be customized for your local event
Editor’s Note: This fascinating and provocative technical piece on NIST’s manipulation of the WTC 7 evidence is broken down into a series of six articles. The first installment (below) is the INTRODUCTION to the whole series. Stand by for the next five installments in subsequent articles, to be published monthly.
Editor’s Note: In recent years, various members of the AE911Truth team have been working on a white paper titled “Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports.” Last month they finally completed the document. Its 25 concise points offer the most convincing proof that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the September 11, 2001, destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings were unscientific and fraudulent.
Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?” The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.
PART 12: SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY
Editor’s Note: Our September newsletter introduced readers to Australian 9/11 blogger Dahlia Mae Lachlan, who, in this AE911Truth articlerepublished from her blog site GumshoeNews.com, called on Sir Isaac Newton’s scientific discoveries to make the case that the three toppled towers were subjected not to gravitational collapses but to controlled demolitions.
For eight years, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has sought an impartial, subpoena-powered investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001.
The idea of having a 9/11 Truth billboard in Times Square was once just “pie in the sky,” says Les Jamieson, New York City’s point man for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. But today it’s a reality that Jamieson believes is bigger and more significant than anyone could have predicted.
It’s about being willing to step out of your safety zone and rethink how the world really works.
That’s the essence of David Hooper’s new documentary, The Anatomy of a Great Deception, which kicked off this year’s 13th anniversary commemoration of 9/11 in several cities.
It has been 13 years since the tragic events of September 11, 2001, spawned the rebirth of what has become America’s guiding mantra — „Never Forget.“ But to faithfully heed its message, mustn’t we, in addition to remembering the fatal day called 9/11, also remember the spheres of molten iron, the melting of steel, the free-fall of a skyscraper not hit by an airplane, and a host of other physical laws that prove the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center skyscrapers? The answer to this question is where the mainstream media and the 9/11 Truth movement depart. It also explains why, on the 13th anniversary of 9/11, hundreds of supporters of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth descended upon the World Trade Center in New York.
Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?” The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.
This 9/11 anniversary is the thirteenth. We intend to make it the most effective effort yet. Our lineup of activities and speakers is incredible.
But it needs you there. Can you get to New York to help us? Check out and download the full NYC schedule full NYC schedule for dates, times, and locations.
Editor’s Note: Investigative reporter Russ Baker launched the online publication WhoWhatWhy.com five years ago to do what he calls „forensic journalism“—that is, reporting that is „rigorous, relentless, and scientific.“ Sounds like a description of AE911Truth’s research, doesn’t it? In mid-August, Baker wrote an article about the NYC Coalition for Accountability NOW (NYC CAN), and interviewed its founder, Ted Walter. You can read the piece here:
Editor’s Note: We republish a brilliant little gem that reflects upon Newton’s law of universal gravitation—a law that was still in effect on 9/11, judging by the photographic evidence. The article, written by „Down Under“ blogger Dalia Mae Lachlan, was originally published in Flipside News.
Lachlan, by the way, has also authored a series of children’s books, „Awaken Your Kids“ — one of which, „The Three Tall Buildings,“ helps youngsters understand what really happened on 9/11 so they can explain it to their parents. Sometimes that’s the way the world wakes up.
Stan Beattie, PE, a member of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Presenter Team, became convinced that the official story of the events of September 11, 2001, was false after reading Dr. David Griffin’s book,The New Pearl Harbor, in 2004.
He became so committed to sharing the truth with his fellow Americans that in 2007 he flew from his home outside Detroit, Michigan, to Washington, D.C., to join a protest on the Mall against the Bush surge of the Iraq War. While Stan was walking on the Mall, he met people from DC911Truth, signed their petition, and proudly held up one of their placards. Shortly thereafter, he watched AE911Truth’s two-hourBlueprint for Truth. Since then, he has become both an active member of AE’s Presenter Team and a financial contributor.
Aus dem per ÖVP-Amtsmissbräuche offenkundig verfassungswidrig agrar-ausgeraubten Tirol, vom friedlichen Widerstand, Klaus Schreiner
Don´t be part of the problem! Be part of the solution. Sei dabei! Gemeinsam sind wir stark und verändern unsere Welt! Wir sind die 99 %!
“Wer behauptet, man braucht keine Privatsphäre, weil man nichts zu verbergen hat, kann gleich sagen man braucht keine Redefreiheit weil man selbst nichts zu sagen hat.” Edward Snowden.