Soziologe Frank Furedi: „Mitarbeiter von Soros-NGOs prahlten mit Staatsstreichen“

Warning: Illegal string offset 'filter' in /home/.sites/598/site610/web/wordpress/wp-includes/taxonomy.php on line 1442

Finanzmarkt- und Konzernmacht-Zeitalter der Plutokratie unterstützt von der Mediakratie in den Lobbykraturen der Geld-regiert-Regierungen in Europa, Innsbruck am 13.02.2018
Liebe® Blogleser_in,

Bewusstheit, Liebe und Friede sei mit uns allen und ein gesundes sinnerfülltes Leben wünsch ich ebenfalls.

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen:   https://deutsch.rt.com/international/65047-soziologe-frank-furedi-mitarbeiter-von/ 

Soziologe Frank Furedi: „Mitarbeiter von Soros-NGOs prahlten mit Staatsstreichen“

Soziologe Frank Furedi: "Mitarbeiter von Soros-NGOs prahlten mit Staatsstreichen"

 
Frank Furedi ist ein Professor für Soziologie an der University of Kent in Großbritannien.
US-Milliardär George Soros hat eine massive Finanzspritze für Anti-Brexit-Initiativen in Großbritannien angekündigt. In einem Artikel für den Telegraph hat der ungarisch-britische Soziologe Frank Furedi ihm und seinen NGOs nun Größenwahn vorgeworfen.

Der politisch dem klassisch-liberalen Spektrum zuzuordnende Autor und Soziologe Frank Furedi, der unter anderem für den Guardian und das Magazin Novo Argumente schreibt, hat den US-amerikanischen Milliardär und Philanthropen George Soros in einem Artikel für den Telegraph angegriffen.

Furedi, früher als Soziologie an der University of Kent in Canterbury tätig, hat unter dem Eindruck der jüngsten Ankündigung des als Mäzen linksliberaler Anliegen bekannten Soros, umgerechnet mehr als 400.000 Euro für eine Kampagne gegen den Brexit zur Verfügung zu stellen, über Aktivisten berichtet, die für den Milliardär arbeiten.

Diese „Missionare“ hätten bei einem privaten Mittagessen mit Furedi diesem gegenüber damit geprahlt, Regierungen gestürzt zu haben.

Mehr erfahren –  George Soros investiert 500.000 US-Dollar in Anti-Brexit-Kampagne

Die jüngste Initiative Soros‘, die britische Regierung in Bedrängnis zu bringen und ein neues Brexit-Referendum zu erzwingen, füge sich in diese Beobachtung. Furedi deutet an, der Milliardär offenbare ein sehr gespanntes Verhältnis zu Entscheidungen, die Stimmbürger in freier Wahl getroffen hätten:

Soros denkt, dass, wenn Menschen falsch gewählt hätten, er dazu berufen sei, ihre Entscheidungen wieder umzuwerfen. […] Soros glaubt nicht an die Legitimität von Grenzen oder die Autorität nationaler Elektorate. In Konsequenz daraus fühlt er sich dazu ermächtigt, das politische Schicksal von Gesellschaften auf der ganzen Welt zu beeinflussen und wenn möglich zu steuern.

„Arrogantes Ethos“ des Soros-Netzwerks

Furedis Zusammentreffen mit der „Soros-Gemeinde“ habe 2013 in Ungarn im Rahmen eines Jugendaustausches der Open Society stattgefunden. Damals wären so genannte zivilgesellschaftliche Akteure aus aller Welt angereist:

Die meisten davon waren smarte, idealistische junge Menschen, die dazu entschlossen schienen, die Welt zu einem besseren Ort zu machen. Meine einzige Besorgnis bezüglich der Zusammenkunft war, dass diese ihre Teilnehmer als eine Gruppe demokratischer Missionare betrachtete, die zurück nach Hause gehen sollten, um eine frohe Botschaft zu verkünden.

Lesen Sie auch –  Netanjahu: Soros steckt hinter Protesten gegen Flüchtlingspolitik in Israel  

Die Kehrseite dieses Enthusiasmus sei aber schon wenig später abseits des Protokolls zutage getreten. So schildert Furedi:

Es war später während des Mittagessens in einem vornehmen Budapester Hotel, dass ich der vollen Kraft des arroganten Ethos begegnen sollte, das vom Soros-Organisationsnetzwerk ausgeht. An meinem Tisch lauschte ich niederländischen, amerikanischen, britischen, ukrainischen und ungarischen Vertretern von Soros-NGOs, wie sie sich ihrer Errungenschaften rühmten. Einige behaupteten, sie hätten eine größere Rolle während des Arabischen Frühlings in Ägypten gespielt. Andere brachten ihren Stolz über ihren Beitrag zur Demokratisierung der Ukraine zum Ausdruck. Einige prahlten über ihren Einfluss bei der Vorbereitung des Sturzes des Gaddafi-Regimes in Libyen.

Furedi erklärt, still dabeigesessen zu sein und sich unwohl gefühlt zu haben in einer Gruppe von Menschen, die „auf so beiläufige Weise davon ausgehen, sie hätten das Recht, in aller Welt Gott zu spielen“. Eine ungarische Leiterin einer Soros-NGO habe ihn gefragt, was Furedi denn von ihrer Arbeit halte. Dieser gab nach eigenen Angaben höflich zu verstehen, er sei sich nicht sicher, ob es legitim wäre, geschweige denn funktionieren würde, deren [der Soros-NGOs] Vorstellung von Demokratie dem libyschen Volk aufzudrücken.

„Man kann nicht warten, bis Libyen seinen eigenen Jefferson hervorbringt“

Sein Gegenüber habe ihm dann ohne zu zögern geantwortet:

Ich glaube nicht, dass wir uns den Luxus leisten können, darauf zu warten, bis das libysche Volk seinen eigenen [früheren US-Präsidenten Thomas] Jefferson hervorbringt.

Furedi erinnerte sich, aufgeschreckt gewesen zu sein durch den „herrischen Ton, in dem sie mich darüber belehrte, wie man in Ländern wie Libyen die Rolle Jeffersons auszufüllen habe“.

Mehr zum Thema –  Soros warnt: „Nationalismus ist dominant geworden – EU steht vor dem Zusammenbruch“

Sieben Jahre nach dem durch die NATO unterstützten Sturz des langjährigen Staatschefs Muammar al-Gaddafi ist Libyen nach wie vor ein Failed State, in dem mehrere Regierungen die Macht für sich beanspruchen, radikal-islamische Terrorgruppen ganze Landstriche dominieren, Schwarzafrikaner offen auf Sklavenmärkten gehandelt werden und kriminelle Menschenschmuggler satte Profite damit machen, illegale Einwanderer auf dem Seeweg nach Europa zu bringen – nicht selten mithilfe von NGOs, die Verbindungen zu Soros aufweisen.  

Antisemitismus-Vorwurf gegen Soros-Kritiker geht ins Leere

Furedi, der ebenso wie Soros aus einer ungarisch-jüdischen Familie stammt, wies auch Vorwürfe an die Kritiker des US-Milliardärs zurück, diese wären von antisemitischen Ressentiments getrieben.

Ich bin bestürzt darüber, dass manche versuchen, Soros-Kritiker als antijüdisch zu brandmarken“, schrieb Furedi. „Dem Anliegen, den Antisemitismus zu bekämpfen, ist mit einer solchen opportunistischen Verwendung des Begriffs schlecht geholfen.“

Während er, Furedi, „die meisten [seiner ungarisch-jüdischen] Familienmitglieder im Holocaust verloren [hat]“, habe Soros überlebt, indem er sich als das offizielle christliche Patenkind eines ungarischen Beamten ausgab, den er auf seinen Touren begleitet hätte, auf denen es darum gegangen wäre, Eigentum von Juden zu beschlagnahmen, die nicht so gute Beziehungen zur Obrigkeit gehabt hätten.

 —————————————————————————————————————————————
 
 

Russlandhasser & völkerrechtswidriger Regime Change-VERBRECHER Georg Soros Millionenspenden wirken?!

 

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: https://www.hrw.org/de/news/2010/09/07/george-soros-spendet-100-millionen-us-human-rights-watch

Andrea Drescher

Was man so lesen kann: Druck auf Russland: NGOs fordern Ausschluss aus UN-Menschenrechtsrat 

Eine Gruppe NGOs, darunter Human Rights Watch, fordert den Ausschluss Russlands aus dem UN-Menschenrechtsrat. Grund für die gewünschte Strafmaßnahme sind die militärischen Operationen Moskaus in Syrien.

Soweit – so wenig überraschend, wenn man zufälligerweise auch über diese Information verfügt – steht aber selten in Spiegel online oder der Süddeutschen .

George Soros spendet 100 Millionen US$ an Human Rights Watch
Gelder der Open Society Foundation sollen globale Präsenz stärken
(New York, 7. September 2010) – Der Philanthrop und Geldgeber George Soros hat heute bekannt gegeben, dass er in den nächsten zehn Jahren 100 Millionen US$ an Human Rights Watch spenden wird. Die Gelder der Open Society Foundation sollen zur Ausweitung und Vertiefung der globalen Arbeit von Human Rights Watch verwendet werden, um wirksamer die Menschenrechte weltweit zu schützen und zu fördern. Es ist der höchste Betrag, den Soros jemals an eine Nichtregierungsorganisation vergeben hat.
https://www.hrw.org/…/george-soros-spendet-100-millionen-us…

Dieser bekennende Russlandhasser hat sicher keine Erwartungen mit dieser Spende verbunden – nein, wer wird denn auf die Idee kommen?

danke claudia für den hinweis!

 

George Soros spendet 100 Millionen US$ an Human Rights Watch

Gelder der Open Society Foundation sollen globale Präsenz stärken

 

(New York, 7. September 2010) – Der Philanthrop und Geldgeber George Soros hat heute bekannt gegeben, dass er in den nächsten zehn Jahren 100 Millionen US$ an Human Rights Watch spenden wird. Die Gelder der Open Society Foundation sollen zur Ausweitung und Vertiefung der globalen Arbeit von Human Rights Watch verwendet werden, um wirksamer die Menschenrechte weltweit zu schützen und zu fördern. Es ist der höchste Betrag, den Soros jemals an eine Nichtregierungsorganisation vergeben hat.

Die Voraussetzung für die Spende ist, dass Human Rights Watch, das keine Regierungsgelder annimmt, zusätzlich 100 Millionen US$ durch private Spenden einwirbt. Human Rights Watch hofft, dass Soros‘ Spende, die Verpflichtung zum Einwerben zusätzlicher Gelder sowie weiteres Fundraising dazu führen, dass ein strategischer Plan zur Internationalisierung der Organisation umgesetzt werden kann. Dazu muss Human Rights Watch innerhalb von fünf Jahren sein Jahresbudget von 48 Millionen auf 80 Millionen US$ erhöhen.

„Human Rights Watch ist eine der effektivsten Organisationen, die ich unterstütze”, so Soros, Gründer und Vorsitzender der Open Society Foundation. „Menschenrechte sind die Grundlage unserer größten Hoffnung: Sie stehen im Zentrum von offenen Gesellschaften.“

Soros ist besonders daran interessiert, Philanthropen in Europa und Nordamerika zu ermutigen, in die Menschenrechtsarbeit zu investieren, besonders wenn dies bis jetzt nicht der Fall war.

Die Gelder sollen die Internationalisierung von Human Rights Watch vorantreiben, wodurch in der ganzen Welt neue Mitarbeiter in Lobbybüros der wichtigsten Hauptstädte eingestellt und die Forschungskapazitäten in relevanten Ländern vertieft werden sollen. Human Rights Watch will insbesondere mehr Einfluss auf die aufstrebenden Mächte im Süden nehmen, um dort eine Menschenrechtsagenda voranzutreiben.

„Human Rights Watch kann seine Wirkung noch verstärken, wenn es eine wirklich internationale Organisation ist”, so Soros. „Human Rights Watch muss in den Hauptstädten der Welt präsent sein, gemeinsam mit Menschenrechtsgruppen vor Ort zu lokalen Themen arbeiten und sich mit lokalen Regierungsvertretern auseinandersetzen. In fünf Jahren ist es das Ziel, dass die Hälfte der Einnahmen und eine Mehrheit der Vorstandsmitglieder nicht mehr aus den USA kommen.“

Indem Human Rights Watch die internationale Aufmerksamkeit auf Menschenrechtsverletzungen lenkt, erhalten die Opfer eine Stimme und die Verantwortlichen werden für ihre Verbrechen zu Rechenschaft gezogen.
Kompromisslose und objektive Untersuchungen sowie strategische und gezielte Lobbyarbeit sind die Grundlage für politischen Druck, um Veränderung zu bewirken und die Kosten für Menschenrechtsverletzungen zu erhöhen. Seit 1978 setzt sich Human Rights Watch für tiefgreifende Verbesserungen bei der Achtung der Menschenrechte ein und hat dazu beigetragen, dass Menschen weltweit von mehr Gerechtigkeit und Sicherheit profitieren.

„In einer zunehmend multipolaren Welt müssen wir sicherstellen, dass die Botschaft von Human Rights Watch in den einflussreichen Hauptstädten der Welt wahrgenommen wird“, so Kenneth Roth, Executive Director von Human Rights Watch. „Um schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen zu beenden, muss auf jede Regierung, die eine Veränderung bewirken kann, Druck ausgeübt werden, einschließlich der aufstrebenden Mächte im Süden.“

Human Rights Watch hat fast 300 Mitarbeiter und arbeitet zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen in fast 90 Ländern. Pro Jahr werden etwa 100 Berichte und mehrere hundert Pressemitteilungen veröffentlicht. Durch die zusätzlichen Gelder kann Human Rights Watch in neue Arbeitsbereiche investieren, um Lücken in der Berichterstattung zu schließen, unter anderem in Afrika und Asien. Zudem kann Human Rights Watch intensiver über Themen berichten, für die es bisher zu wenig Experten gibt.

Neben der gesteigerten Wirksamkeit der Forschung will Human Rights Watch zusätzliche Mitarbeiter einstellen, um mit nationalen Regierungen wirksamer zu lokalen und regionalen Themen arbeiten zu können und Verbindungen zu Journalisten aufzubauen, die sich an ein lokales Publikum wenden. Mit weiteren Forschungsmitarbeitern und Lobbyvertretern in wichtigen Ländern kann Human Rights Watch besser mit Regierungsvertretern, Journalisten sowie der Zivilgesellschaft zusammenarbeiten und sicherstellen, dass eine positive Veränderung stattfindet.

„Wir hoffen, dass George Soros‘ Beispiel der Menschenrechtsbewegung weltweit dabei hilft, Philanthropen zu bewegen, in das Ideal der Menschenrechte zu investieren.

—————————————————————————————————————————————

 
 

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: http://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=34805

Die Demokratie des George Soros

Veröffentlicht in: Außen- und SicherheitspolitikErosion der Demokratie,Lobbyorganisationen und interessengebundene WissenschaftStrategien der Meinungsmache

Paul Schreyer

Der Multimilliardär George Soros ist ein ebenso schillerndes wie widersprüchliches Phänomen: zum einen der Börsenspekulant, der sein Geld auch damit verdient, im großen Stil auf den Niedergang von Währungen und Volkswirtschaften zu wetten, zum anderen der freigiebige Spender, Intellektuelle und politische Aktivist, der nach eigenen Worten die Demokratie fördern und Menschen in aller Welt zu mehr Freiheit in einer „offenen Gesellschaft“ verhelfen will. Nun sind tausende interne Dokumente der von ihm geführten politischen Stiftungen aufgetaucht, die zeigen, mit welchen Methoden er dabei vorgeht. Die Leitmedien schweigen bislang zu den Enthüllungen. VonPaul Schreyer[*].

George Soros wurde 1930 in Budapest geboren, verließ das Land nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg, um in England Philosophie zu studieren und machte anschließend in den USA im Finanzsektor Karriere, erst als Wertpapierhändler, dann als Fondsmanager. Sein Vater, ein Schriftsteller, war im Ersten Weltkrieg in einem sibirischen Arbeitslager interniert gewesen, kehrte später nach Ungarn zurück und emigrierte 1956, nachdem die Sowjetunion den ungarischen Volksaufstand gewaltsam niedergeschlagen hatte, in die USA. Es liegt nahe, das spätere Engagement seines Sohnes für eine Befreiung Osteuropas von sowjetischer Vorherrschaft auch als Antwort auf diese familiäre Vorgeschichte zu verstehen. Soros selbst beschrieb den Beginn seines politischen Aktivismus und seine Ziele dabei so:

„Ich gründete meine erste Stiftung 1984 in Ungarn. Die Idee dahinter war einfach. Das von den herrschenden Kommunisten propagierte Staatsdogma war falsch und wir konnten diese Lüge enttarnen, indem wir eine Alternative anboten. Daher unterstützten wir jede kulturelle Initiative, die nicht das herrschende Dogma vertrat. Geleitet wurde ich durch das Konzept der ‚offenen Gesellschaft‘, das ich vom Philosophen Karl Popper übernahm. In meinen Augen war die offene Gesellschaft eine höher entwickelte Form des sozialen Zusammenlebens, als die totalitären geschlossenen Gesellschaften des Ostblocks. Letztere versuchten, zentralistische Pläne umzusetzen; in einer offenen Gesellschaft konnte jeder Einzelne seinen eigenen Plan verfolgen. Die Umwandlung von einer geschlossenen zu einer offenen Gesellschaft erforderte Hilfe von außen – und diese sollten meine Stiftungen gewähren.“

Soweit die Leitgedanken des Milliardärs zur Gründung seiner berühmten „Open Society Foundations“, die eigenen Angaben zufolge mittlerweile in 41 Ländern mit insgesamt 1800 Mitarbeitern tätig sind. Ihr Jahresetat für 2016 beträgt 930 Millionen Dollar. Damit gehören die Soros-Stiftungen zu den einflussreichsten politischen Organisationen der Welt – und sind doch letztlich nur einer einzigen Person und deren privaten Zielen verpflichtet.

Zweifelhafte Quellen der „Open Society“

Immer wieder wird Soros vorgeworfen, er handle im Sinne einer aggressiven US-Außenpolitik und unterstütze den Kampf der Amerikaner gegen missliebige Regierungen, wie etwa 2014 in der Ukraine. Tatsächlich überschneiden sich die Interessen der Weltmacht USA mit denen von Soros an vielen Stellen, wie eben in Osteuropa – und das schon seit Jahrzehnten.

Es ist seit langem bekannt, dass die CIA in ihrem Kampf gegen den Kommunismus im Kalten Krieg viele Intellektuelle förderte, vor allem mittels der von ihr verdeckt finanzierten Organisation „Congress for Cultural Freedom“. Es ging darum, dem kommunistischen Block mit seinem populären Versprechen sozialer Gerechtigkeit und seinen antikapitalistischen Idealen etwas Geistiges entgegenzusetzen, das die Intellektuellen im Westen wie im Osten als attraktiv empfanden. Man wählte die Idee der „Freiheit“, die sich gut dem dogmatisch klingenden Politjargon und der offensichtlichen Zensur im Osten gegenüberstellen ließ, und förderte über die Jahre eine Vielzahl von intellektuellen Zeitschriften, sowie Künstlern und Publizisten, sofern diese nicht offen mit dem Kommunismus sympathisierten. Meist wussten die geförderten Intellektuellen und Künstler selbst nicht, dass ihre Unterstützung auf einer Finanzierung der CIA beruhte, da das Geld diskret über zwischengeschaltete Stiftungen verteilt wurde. Wie der Historiker Anselm Doering-Manteuffel schrieb, diente der „Congress for Cultural Freedom“ den USA nach 1945 „als Waffe im Kampf gegen den Kommunismus und bald auch als ideelles Angebot an die Intellektuellen Westeuropas, ein gemeinwestliches kulturelles Bewusstsein zu entwickeln und die traditionelle Abgrenzung von europäischer Hochkultur gegen die amerikanische Massenkultur zu überwinden“.
Eine der wichtigsten Tochterorganisationen dieses CIA-Programms war die 1966 gegründete „Fondation pour une entraide intellectuelle européenne“ („Europäische Stiftung für intellektuelle Zusammenarbeit“), welche Dissidenten in Osteuropa unterstützte, sofern diese nicht emigrierten, sondern im Osten blieben und dort weiter kritisch wirkten. Ab 1978 beteiligte sich George Soros an der Finanzierung dieser Stiftung. Nach dem Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion verschmolz die Stiftung im Jahr 1991 vollständig mit der von Soros neu geschaffenen „Open Society“-Organisation. Der Finanzier baute seine Stiftung somit direkt auf einem osteuropäischen Netzwerk auf, das mit verdeckter CIA-Finanzierung über Jahrzehnte hinweg geschaffen worden war.

An dieser Stelle liegt einer der Widersprüche von Soros´ Aktivismus: Einerseits propagiert er eine „offene Gesellschaft“ ohne zentrale Planung einer mächtigen Elite. Andererseits plant er selbst gemeinsam mit einer mächtigen Elite. Er geht die Partnerschaft mit einer Weltmacht ein und baut auf die Mittel und Netzwerke von deren Geheimdienst auf. Diese Weltmacht und ihr Geheimdienst verfolgen mit ihrer Förderung von ehemals sowjet- und nun russlandkritischen Intellektuellen vor allem macht- und geopolitische Ziele. Russland soll geschwächt werden und kein eigenständiger Machtfaktor in der Weltpolitik sein. Am Ende geht es um Vorherrschaft und Marktanteile, letztlich um den Profit für einige Wenige und nicht um die Selbstbestimmung von Völkern.

Soros sieht das offenbar nicht, gibt sich an dieser Stelle naiv – oder ist es tatsächlich. Betrachtet man seine Auftritte und Äußerungen, könnte man Letzteres vermuten, doch ein Blick in die nun geleakten internen Dokumenteseiner Stiftungen zeigt, dass dieser erfolgreiche Geschäftsmann ganz und gar nicht naiv ist, sondern sich mit politischen Tricks und Strategien gut auskennt.

Die Soros-Leaks

Unter den tausenden Papieren befindet sich auch ein 44-seitiges internes Protokoll eines Ukraine-Besuches von George Soros im März 2014, also unmittelbar nach dem Putsch in Kiew. Das Dokument zeigt ihn als selbstbewussten Patriarchen, der erst den amerikanischen Botschafter in Kiew instruiert und dann reihenweise die Minister der Übergangsregierung Jazenjuk zum Rapport antreten lässt.

Dem Stiftungs-Protokoll zufolge betont US-Botschafter Geoffrey Pyatt zu Beginn des Gespräches mit dem Milliardär, wie wichtig es im Moment sei, die Sichtweise der neuen ukrainischen Regierung „mit professionellen PR-Werkzeugen zu verbreiten“. Soros pflichtet dem bei und verweist auf das „Crisis Media Center“, das seine Stiftung im Land schon aufgebaut habe und dass Ministerpräsident Jazenjuk nun auch stärker nutzen müsse.

Der Botschafter teilt außerdem mit, dass US-Außenminister Kerry sehr interessiert daran sei, die Einschätzung von Soros zur derzeitigen Situation zu erfahren. Später im Gespräch bittet der Diplomat ausdrücklich um eine „Kritik der US-Politik“ und fragt direkt, was die amerikanische Regierung aus Soros´ Sicht „tun soll“. Die Antwort des Finanziers: Obama sei „zu weich gegenüber Putin“, es brauche „kraftvolle, kluge Sanktionen“. Nötig sei dabei eine „Arbeitsteilung zwischen den USA und der EU“, bei der die USA, so Soros, „die Rolle des ‚bad cop‘ spielen“ und Sanktionen gegenüber Russland verhängen sollten, und zwar „für 90 Tage, oder bis die russische Regierung die Ergebnisse der Wahlen anerkennt“.

Nebenbei erfährt man, dass der Milliardär offenbar auch einen hochrangigen Informanten im Auswärtigen Ausschuss des Deutschen Bundestages hat. Er sei „noch immer beunruhigt“, so Soros im März 2014, von Informationen, die er aus dem Ausschuss erhalten habe und denen zufolge Merkel einer möglichen Föderalisierung der Ukraine, wie Putin sie anstrebe, wohlwollend gegenüberstehe.

Was die ukrainische Innenpolitik angeht, regt Soros eine Justizreform „im Saakaschwili-Stil“ an. „Schlechte Richter“, so der Milliardär, sollen ausgesondert und entlassen werden. Gegenüber dem Justizminister Pawel Petrenko wiederholt er in einem separaten Gespräch, dass es nötig sei, „die Mehrheit der Richter zu ersetzen“, um einen „echten Regimewechsel“ abzusichern. Er selbst könne außerdem „Experten“ aus seiner Stiftung schicken, die beim Schreiben neuer Gesetze helfen. Der Justizminister reagiert dem Protokoll zufolge „sehr empfänglich“ auf diese Idee.

Demokratie „von oben“

Die Lektüre dieses Protokolls vom März 2014 macht vor allem eines deutlich: Soros betrachtet die Ukraine ähnlich wie ein Großgrundbesitzer sein neu erworbenes Land. Zwar möchte er dort, ganz modern und liberal, „Demokratie spielen“ lassen – allerdings eben unter Aufsicht. Diese Rolle ermöglichen ihm zum einen sein immenses Vermögen (laut Forbes Magazine gehört er zu den 25 reichsten Menschen der Welt), und zum anderen sein über Jahrzehnte hinweg aufgebautes Netzwerk im Land.

Man gewinnt dabei den Eindruck, dass Soros einer grotesken Selbsttäuschung erliegt, wenn er glaubt, dass allein mit genügend Geld, Mitarbeitern und Planungsaufwand eine Demokratie „von oben“ verankert werden könne. Um so fragwürdiger erscheint das Vorhaben, wenn die neue „Offenheit“ der Gesellschaft sich darin erschöpft, das Land vom einem Machtzentrum (Russland) zu lösen und einem anderen (EU / NATO / USA) anzunähern, sich ansonsten aber kaum etwas ändert, insbesondere an den wirtschaftlichen Spielregeln. Bei solch einer Strategie kann eigentlich nur ein geändertes Patronage-System entstehen, ein Tausch der Herrscher – aber keine sich selbst organisierende Gesellschaft.

Vielleicht ist das am Ende die bittere Ironie in Soros´ Lebenswerk: mit großer Mühe etwas aufzubauen, das er ursprünglich hatte bekämpfen wollen – nämlich die Herrschaft durch eine zentrale Macht, die verdeckt agiert und niemandem Rechenschaft schuldig ist. Daneben fällt auf, dass Soros´ Rhetorik von den „geschlossenen unfreien Gesellschaften“ sich stets nur gegen die zentrale und autoritäre Machtausübung von Staaten richtet, aber nicht gegen die ganz ähnlich zentrale und autoritäre Machtausübung von Unternehmen oder Superreichen. Mehr noch: Der Finanzier versucht den unmöglichen Spagat, einerseits als Großspekulant in turbokapitalistischer Manier Milliarden zu verdienen, und andererseits als Sozialreformer und moderner liberaler Philosoph die Welt zu retten. Menschlich gesehen erscheint das fast tragisch. Politisch ist es verheerend, so wie eigentlich immer, wenn ein Geschäftsmann kraft seiner über Vermögensgewinne angehäuften Macht glaubt, weiser zu sein als andere und aus seinem Geld und seiner „Weisheit“ dann politische Ansprüche zur Führung der Gesellschaft ableitet. Im Stalinismus diente eine vermeintlich überlegene Ideologie als Rechtfertigung für die autoritäre Herrschaft Einzelner, im Kapitalismus braucht es im Grunde überhaupt keine Rechtfertigung, es reicht der pure Vermögensbesitz.

Das Ausblenden der Armut

Die noblen Worte von der „offenen Gesellschaft“ und der „Freiheit“ des Westens stellten einige osteuropäische Intellektuelle schon Anfang der 1990er Jahre in Frage. So berichtet die ZEIT-Herausgeberin Marion Gräfin Dönhoff (1909-2002) in einem Artikel aus dem Jahr 1991 von ihrem Besuch eines Seminars der schon genannten „Europäischen Stiftung für intellektuelle Zusammenarbeit“ (deren CIA-Finanzierung die Gräfin dabei nicht erwähnt). Dort traf sie unter anderem den ungarischen Philosophen Elemer Hankiss (1928-2015), der selbst von der Stiftung gefördert wurde und der nun, 1991, sagte:

„In der kommunistischen Ära wurde Freiheit zu einem allumfassenden Begriff, der sämtliche anderen Werte gleich mitliefert: Glück, Zufriedenheit, soziale Gerechtigkeit, Liebe, Loyalität … Wir lebten in der Illusion, dass alle Probleme gelöst wären, sobald wir eines Tages die kommunistische Diktatur los sein würden. Und als dann die Freiheit kam und viele Probleme blieben, fühlten wir uns getäuscht und waren verwirrt. Wir konnten es nicht fassen, dass man in einer freien Gesellschaft hungern und frieren, dass man krank und sogar unglücklich sein kann.“

Während im Osten viele Menschen diesen Unterschied zwischen Illusion (oder Propaganda) und Realität rasch begriffen, scheint die Täuschung in Köpfen wie dem von George Soros fortzuleben. Allerdings nicht nur bei ihm; auch kein einziger Vertreter der sogenannten „Zivilgesellschaft“, die Soros laut dem geleakten Protokoll traf, wies im direkten Gespräch mit dem Gönner auf das weitaus drängendste Problem des Landes hin – nämlich die riesige Armut dort. Stattdessen wiederholten die Ukrainer, die in den Soros-Stiftungen und anderen NGOs vor Ort arbeiteten, bei ihren Reformvorschlägen vor allem Begriffe wie „Transparenz“, „Korruptionsbekämpfung“, „Professionalität“, „zivilgesellschaftliche Partizipation“ und ähnliches.

Ohne Frage sind dies wichtige Ziele. Doch ohne eine konkrete materielle Basis, also genügend Arbeitsplätze und ausreichende Löhne, haben sie für die Bevölkerung nur vergleichsweise geringen Wert und sind im Alltag auch kaum durchsetzbar. Die Korruption im Staatsapparat etwa lässt sich nicht nachhaltig bekämpfen, solange Armut herrscht, da die bestochenen Beamten dann auf das illegale „Zubrot“ oftmals real angewiesen sind.

Viele Maidan-Revolutionäre, die oft aus der dünnen oberen Mittelschicht Kiews stammen, scheinen ähnlich abgekoppelt zu sein von den grundlegenden Sorgen der Bevölkerung, wie auch viele Politiker und Journalisten aus der Mittelschicht hier in Deutschland. Sie verengen ihren Blick auf eine wünschenswerte politische Freiheit und wichtige Standards, unterschätzen dabei aber den Wert von ausreichender sozialer Sicherheit für alle (nicht bloß für die Mittelschicht), ohne die eine Gesellschaft insgesamt weder stabil, noch demokratisch sein kann – und am Ende auch nicht frei.

Partner des IWF

Für das Soros-Programm hat soziale Sicherheit keine hohe Priorität. Das Freiheitsversprechen wird konterkariert durch die Partnerschaft mit dem IWF, der im Gegenzug für Kredite bekanntlich die immer gleichen Forderungen erhebt und auch durchsetzt: Deregulierung, Privatisierung und Sozialabbau. Wie sehr die Soros-Stiftung sich in der Ukraine als Partner des IWF sieht, macht eine weitere Passage aus dem geleakten Protokoll deutlich. Yarema Bachynsky, ein gebürtiger New Yorker und Vorstandsmitglied von Soros´ ukrainischer Stiftung, diskutiert dort mit dem Milliardär, wie man Petro Poroschenko einzuschätzen habe, der damals, im März 2014, noch kein Präsident war, aber schon als aussichtsreicher Kandidat für den Posten galt. Bachynsky betont gegenüber Soros, er habe von Poroschenko noch nichts vernommen, was den Prinzipien der Stiftung entgegenlaufe. Er glaube, dass im Falle einer Poroschenko-Präsidentschaft „keine Widersprüche“ zu dem, „was IWF oder OSF in der Ukraine tun“ zu erwarten seien (OSF ist die Abkürzung für Soros´ „Open Society Foundation“). Man müsse daher, so Bachynsky, nun rasch die Aufmerksamkeit Poroschenkos erlangen, um nach seiner möglichen Wahl eine „so enge Verbindung zu ihm“ zu haben, dass sichergestellt sei, dass der Präsident sich dann „den Plänen von OSF oder IWF nicht widersetzt“. In einem anderen Gespräch mit Vertrauten merkt Soros zwar an, man solle die ukrainische Regierung bei Verhandlungen mit dem IWF dahingehend beraten, dass soziale Kürzungen nicht als Kreditbedingungen akzeptiert werden sollten, doch grundsätzlich erscheint der IWF in den Gesprächen als enger Partner.

Maidan ohne Soros nicht erfolgreich?

Welchen Anteil hatte Soros nun am Umsturz 2014? Beim Treffen mit dem Vorstand der Stiftung äußerte sich dazu Victoria Siumar, die viele Jahre für den von der US-Regierung finanzierten Auslandssender Voice of America arbeitete und dann für den von Soros finanzierten Radiosender „Hromadske“, der die Maidanbewegung direkt unterstützte. Siumar saß 2014 im Vorstand der ukrainischen Soros-Stiftung und stieg nach dem Putsch in den „Nationalen Sicherheits- und Verteidigungsrat“ unter Ministerpräsident Jazenjuk auf. In dem nungeleakten Protokoll ist nachzulesen, wie sie Ihrem Gönner im persönlichen Gespräch im März 2014 dankt „für alles“, was er „für die Ukraine getan“ habe, da ohne seine Anstrengungen „die Revolution wohl nicht erfolgreich gewesen wäre“. Die Partner der Soros-Stiftungen, so Siumar, seien „der Hauptmotor und die Grundlage der Maidan-Bewegung“ gewesen. Der Milliardär äußert sich daraufhin zustimmend: Es sei „einzigartig“, was seine Stiftung „in jüngster Zeit erreicht“ habe.

Dabei ist das Soros-Netzwerk nur eines von vielen. Ähnlich finanzstark und gut vernetzt waren und sind in der Ukraine etwa die halbstaatliche US-Stiftung „National Endowment for Democracy“, oder die „Eurasia Foundation“, deren Hauptsponsor ebenfalls die US-Regierung ist. Gemeinsam haben sich diese Stiftungen in nahezu allen Strukturen des politischen Lebens der Ukraine mittlerweile so fest etabliert, dass es schwer fällt, noch von einer authentisch „ukrainischen“ Politik oder Bürgerbewegung zu sprechen. Natürlich gibt es auch in Kiew vom Ausland unabhängige Akteure, doch in einer so armen Region haben Sponsoren mit nahezu endlosen Geldmitteln besonders leichtes Spiel, sich durchzusetzen und Menschen vor Ort dauerhaft an sich zu binden. Ob man eine solche Entwicklung als „demokratischen Fortschritt“ bezeichnen kann, bleibt mehr als fraglich.

Die Medien schweigen

In deutschen, aber auch in amerikanischen Leitmedien sucht man Berichte über die Soros-Leaks bislang vergebens. Die in diesem Sommer erstmals in Erscheinung getretene Whistleblower-Plattform „DC Leaks“ hat die Dokumente am 13. August veröffentlicht, ohne dass die zahlreichen investigativen Kollegen von Spiegel, Süddeutscher Zeitung und Co. davon Notiz genommen hätten – ein weiteres Beispiel für die Existenz einer „Lückenpresse“. Lediglich die deutschen Ableger russischer Staatsmedien wie RT oder Sputnik brachtenBerichte.
Über die Organisation „DC Leaks“ ist derweil wenig bekannt. Vor den Soros-Leaks hatte das Portal unter anderem Emails von Ex-Nato-Oberbefehlshaber Breedlove öffentlich gemacht, die zeigten, wie der General hinter den Kulissen versuchte, Druck auf US-Präsident Obama auszuüben, damit die Situation in der Ukraine stärker eskalierte. Auch zu dieser Enthüllung hatten die Medien nahezu vollständig geschwiegen, in den USA, wie in Deutschland. Von den großen Leitmedien brachte lediglich der Spiegel einen Artikel, in seiner Printausgabe.

„DC Leaks“ scheint sich bislang auf Material zu Russlands Gegnern zu konzentrieren, was den Verdacht nahelegt, dass der russische Geheimdienst dahinter stecken könnte. Auch ein Bloomberg-Berichtdeutet das an. Sollte die Vermutung zutreffen, würde das gleichwohl nichts an der Brisanz der Leaks ändern – schließlich haben weder General Breedlove, noch aktuell die Soros-Stiftungen den Vorwurf erhoben, das veröffentlichte Material sei gefälscht. Selbst wenn ein Geheimdienst für die Leaks verantwortlich sein sollte, wäre das keine Rechtfertigung für die Leitmedien, nicht darüber zu berichten. Die veröffentlichten Informationen sind offenbar zutreffend und authentisch.

Anmerkung: Die Webseite soros.dcleaks.com mit den geleakten Soros-Dokumenten war einige Tagen nicht mehr aufrufbar und wir können nicht sagen, ob und wie lange die Seite nach der Veröffentlichung dieses Textes online bleibt. Somit führt u.U. auch der Link zu dem in diesem Artikel mehrfach zitierten 44-seitigen Protokoll des Soros-Besuchs in der Ukraine vom März 2014 ins Leere. Die NachDenkSeiten haben das Dokument rechtzeitig gesichert und stellen es ihren Lesern unter diesem alternativen Link zur Verfügung.


[«*Paul Schreyer ist freier Journalist, Autor, Mitarbeiter und regelmäßiger Autor der NachDenkSeiten. Sein Buch „Wir sind die Guten – Ansichten eines Putinverstehers oder wie uns die Medien manipulieren“ (mit Mathias Bröckers) wurde ein Spiegel-Bestseller.

 —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Vorbemerkungen: Udo Ulfkotte schreibt in seinem Buch „Gekaufte Journalisten: Wie Politiker, Geheimdienste und Hochfinanz Deutschlands Massenmedien lenken“: „Die Wochenzeitung New Statesman enthüllt in einem langen Bericht (2003) […]: ‚In von George Soros mitfinanzierten, vermeintlich gemeinnützigen Organisationen sind häufig Ex-Mitarbeiter amerikanischer Geheimdienste oder geheimdienstnaher Organisationen oder Militärs mit Führungsaufgaben betraut. Und: Es besteht kein Zweifel daran, dass Firmen von George Soros und NGOs eng in die US-Expansion einbezogen sind.‘ Bereits zugegeben hat er, an folgenden Umstürzen beteiligt gewesen zu sein: Polen 80er-Jahre, Umsturz MiloševiÄ� (Serbien), Rosenrevolution in Georgien. Soros räumte unumwunden ein: ‚Meine Stiftungen trugen zu den Regimewechseln in derSlowakei (1998), Kroatien (1999) und Jugoslawien (2000) bei und mobilisierten die Zivilgesellschaft, um Vladimír MeÄ�iar, Franjo TuÄ�man und Slobodan MiloševiÄ� aus ihren Ämtern zu vertreiben.‘“ … wobei allerdings ebenfalls Rockefellers Stiftungen mitwirkten.

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: http://www.antikrieg.com/aktuell/2014_03_09_scheinheiligkeit.htm Autor: William Blum Ausschnitt aus dem Artikel: „Scheinheiligkeit dieser Größenordnung verdient Respekt!“

Die Denkfabrik „National Endowment for Democracy (NED)“ („Nationale Stiftung für Demokratie“) ist eine 1983 von der Reagan-Administration gegründete Agentur zur Förderung politischer Aktion und psychologischer Kriegsführung gegen Staaten, die den Interessen der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika im Wege stehen. Sie kann als Washingtons führendes nichtmilitärisches Instrument zur Durchführung von Regimewechseln angesehen werden. Die NED Website führt 65 Projekte an, die die NED in den letzten Jahren allein in der Ukraine finanziell unterstützt hat. Eine „freie Marktwirtschaft“ wird dabei gleichgestellt mit „Demokratie, Reformen und Wachstum“, wobei die Vorteile ausländischer Investitionen betont werden. Allen Weinstein, der an der Entwicklung der Gesetze zur Schaffung der NED mitgearbeitet hat, erklärte 1991: „Eine Menge von dem, was wir heute machen, wurde vor 25 Jahren geheim von der CIA gemacht.“ Die NED bezeichnet sich als NGO – eine nicht ganz passende Kategorisierung. Die NED ist in Wahrheit eine GO (Governmental Organisation), da sie fast ihre gesamte Finanzierung von der Regierung der USA erhält, 11 insgesamt fünf Milliarden Dollar seit 1991. 




Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: http://theduran.com/alex-soros-comes-out-of-the-shadows-son-of-george-soros-is-putting-politicians-in-his-pocket/

LatestNewsSections

Alex Soros comes out of the shadows. Son of George Soros is busy putting politicians in his pocket

George Soros’s son, Alex Soros, promises to carry on his father’s legacy of global corruption, regime change, and conflict creation.

In the midst of the DC leaks revelations, showing how much global influence coupled with global damage, billionaire George Soros and his NGOs have inflicted on the planet, it is a disheartening to know that Soros’s son is now emerging from the shadows, poised to carry on his father’s global destabilisation legacy.

 

Like his father, Alex Soros is a progressive liberal who believes it is his duty to destroy nation states, do away with traditional family values, and expunge Christianity from the face of the earth.

The young Soros is already off to a good start, whining and dining with all the right people who will help him carry on the “good” work of his father. Work that we can all familiarise ourselves with thanks to DC Leaks.

Alex-Soros-Hillary-Clinton-Tim-Kaine

Breitbart profiled the billionaire, regime change specialist’s son…

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton’s running mate, dined exclusively with the son of progressive billionaire George Soros on Thursday evening, according to a photo posted on Alexander Soros’ Instagram on Friday afternoon.

“Love this man!” Alex Soros wrote along with a photograph of him with the vice presidential hopeful. “Was great to have dinner with a man we need to call one day #vicepresident @timkaine last night! He is definitely the real deal!”

The fact that Alex Soros, who was inspired in his own progressivism by his controversial father, has unfettered access to Kaine—Hillary Clinton’s running mate—is unsurprising. The Clinton apparatus has long come under scrutiny for their closeness with high dollar donor class figures, some of which has prompted federal law enforcement to fight for an official criminal investigation into the “Clinton Cash” narrative—one the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Attorney General Loretta Lynch has reportedly shut down. That being said, reports have surfaced that the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara is in fact investigating—along with the FBI—the Clinton Foundation for such donor class proclivities with the Clinton apparatus.

Even more troubling than the Clinton Cash narrative though is the fact that Hillary Clinton’s tax returns—the 2015 returns were released on Friday—show that she and Bill Clinton have made a whopping $240 million since leaving the White House when George W. Bush won the 2000 presidential election. That’s a long way from “dead broke,” which they said they were at the time, and it’s all from their governmental connections and paid speeches.

Alex Soros’ Tim Kaine summit comes after a litany of other high-profile meetings he has had with top Democrats. In fact, during the Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Philadelphia, he got a coveted meeting—and photograph—with Hillary Rodham Clinton herself.

“There can only be one #womancrushwedensday today and that is of course @hillaryclinton, not just for being the first woman to run for president from this nation’s two largest political parties,but I believe the best presidential candidate this nation could have today! Looking forward to seeing her crush it tomorrow! #wcw #hillaryclinton,” he wrote about his meeting and photograph with Clinton herself.

In the past few months, he’s gotten at least a couple of meetings with the sitting president of the United States—Barack Obama—photos of which he posted on Independence Day, July 4, and June 14. In the July 4 posting, Soros bashed the United Kingdom’s decision to vote to “Leave” the European Union—called Brexit.

“A special #july4th #mancrushmonday for president @barackobama! Had European leaders and voters taken his advice they wouldn’t be in this current mess,” Soros wrote with the July 4 Obama picture. “After this farce called #brexit, I have never been more grateful to be American and for the institutions of #federalism, a written constitution, and a leader who doesn’t runaway from his obligations! #independenceday #obama #mcm”

Alex Soros has also got photos with his father, George Soros, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)—the likely next Democratic leader in the U.S. Senate since Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid is retiring—House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Al Franken (D-MN), Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards, Muslim congressman Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and the highly controversial Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett.

In case you need a visual to see what Alex Soros is up, here it is (courtesy of Breitbart).

We are certain that the politicians and dignitaries pictured will not trade in favors for Soros cash.

Alex-Soros-Globalist-Politicians-Instagram-1-640x480

Via: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/12/globalists-unite-hillary-clinton-running-mate-tim-kaine-dines-george-soros-son-donald-trumps-rise-terrifies-world-elite/

——————————————————————

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen:http://www.info-direkt.at/das-george-soros-netzwerk/ 

George Soros kann als „Master of Regime Change“ bezeichnet werden. Er leitet „demokratische Revolutionen“ in der ganzen Welt ein, um letztlich den Weg für US-Konzerne zu ebnen. Sein Netzwerk ist gigantisch:

Das George-Soros-Netzwerk

  1. April 2015

George Soros ist einer der mächtigsten Männer der Welt. Als Hedgefonds-Manager in New York hat er es zu einem auf ca. 13 Milliarden Dollar geschätzten Privatvermögen gebracht (Stand 2009). Sein Unternehmen, Soros Fund Management, steuert mindestens weitere 25 Milliarden Dollar an Vermögenswerten von Investoren. Seit 1979 hat sein Netzwerlk von Stiftungen, darunter deren Flaggschiff, das Open Society Institute (OSI), mehr als 5 Milliarden Dollar an eine Vielzahl von Organisationen ausgeschüttet, deren Ziele mit denen von Soros übereinstimmen. Mit einer Bilanzsumme von 1,93 Milliarden US-Dollar im Jahre 2008, hat OSI allein Dutzende von Millionen Dollar jährlich diesen verschiedenen Gruppen zugewendet.

Im Folgenden eine kleine Auswahl von Gruppen, die von Soros und OSI finanziell unterstützt werden (die Links verweisen auf ausführlichere Beschreibungen der jeweiligen Organisation, zumeist auf der Webseite von DiscoverTheNetworks.org – A Guide to the Political Left):

Organisationen, die Amerika der Verletzung bürgerlicher Rechte und Freiheiten beschuldigen:

Organisationen, die Amerika als eine Nation darstellen, deren dauerhafter Rassismus durch rassische und ethnische Präferenzen zugunsten der Nicht-Weißen ausgeglichen werden muss:

Organisationen, die die amerikanische Strafjustiz gezielt als rassistisch und ungerecht porträtieren:

Organisationen, die zu massivem sozialen Wandel sowie zur Einstellung und Ausbildung von Aktivisten aufrufen, die als Anführer diesen Wandel herbeiführen sollen:

Organisationen, die den Kapitalismus verunglimpfen und zugleich eine dramatische Ausweitung von Programmen zur Sozialfürsorge fordern, die durch ständig steigende Steuern finanziert werden soll:

Organisationen, die sozialisierte Medizin in den Vereinigten Staaten unterstützen:

Organisationen, die die amerikanische Politik nach links drängen wollen, indem sie die Wahl von fortschrittlichen politischen Kandidaten unterstützen:

Organisationen, die linke Ideale und Weltanschauungen in Medien und Kunst unterstützen:

Organisationen, die das amerikanischen Justizsystems mit linken Werten injizieren wollen:

Organisationen, die linksgerichtete Pläne durch Infiltration von Kirchen und Religionsgemeinschaften vorantreiben wollen:

Think Tanks, die linksgerichtete Politik fördern:

Organisationen, die offene Grenzen, Masseneinwanderung, eine Verwässerung der aktuellen Einwanderungsgesetze, mehr Rechte und Vorteile für illegale Einwanderer und letztendlich eine Amnestie für diese herbeiführen wollen:

Organisationen, die sich nahezu allen nationalen Sicherheitsmaßnahmen, welche von der US-Regierung nach 9/11 in Kraft gesetzt wurden, widersetzen:

Organisationen, die im verdächtige antiamerikanische Terroristen und ihre Komplizen verteidigen:

Organisationen, die praktisch alle amerikanischen Militäraktionen als ungerechtfertigt und unmoralisch bezeichnen:

Organisationen, die Amerikas einseitige Abrüstung und/oder eine starke Einschränkung seiner Militärausgaben befürworten:

Organisationen, die für radikalen Umweltschutz eintreten:

Organisationen, die die Todesstrafe unter allen Umständen ablehnen:

  • New Yorkers Against the Death Penalty
  • Witness to Innocence
  • Equal Justice USA
  • Death Penalty Information Center
  • People of Faith against the Death Penalty
  • Fair Trial Initiative

Organisationen, die das heutige zentrale Ziel des Feminismus unterstützen, wonach Amerika eine grundsätzlich sexistische Gesellschaft sei, in der Diskriminierung und Gewalt gegen Frauen epidemisches Ausmaß erreicht habe:

Organisationen, die nicht nur das Recht der Frauen auf vom Steuerzahler finanzierte Abtreibung auf Verlangen, sondern auch politische Kandidaten, die diese Position einnehmen, unterstützten:

Organisationen, die für eine Weltregierung eintreten, wodurch die amerikanische Außenpolitik unter die Kontrolle der Vereinten Nationen oder anderer internationaler Organisationen geraten würde:

Organisationen, die eine Drogenlegalisierung fordern:

Buchautor Peter Schweizer spekuliert über die möglichen Gründe, warum Soros für die Drogenlegalisierung eintritt:

„Ein mehr als realistische Antwort ist die, dass er hofft, davon zu profitieren, wenn Drogen legalisiert werden. Soros war besonders aktiv in Südamerika, kaufte dort große Landstriche und errichtete Allianzen mit jenen, die in der Lage sind, eine Massenproduktion von Drogen anzukurbeln, sollten diese in den Vereinigten Staaten legalisiert werden. Er hat auch zur Finanzierung des Anden-Verbandes von Coca-Blatt-Produzenten beigetragen. Unnötig zu sagen, dass diese Organisation enorm von der Legalisierung von Kokain profitieren würde. Er hat ferner eine 9-prozentige Beteiligung an Banco de Colombia, die in der kolumbianischen Drogenmetropole Cali domiziliert. Die US-Drogenbehörde vermutet, dass die Bank dazu verwendet wird, um Geldwäsche zu betreiben und dass die übrigen Aktionäre Mitglieder eines großen Drogenkartell sind.“

Organisationen, die Sterbehilfe für unheilbar Kranke fordern:

  • The Death with Dignity National Center
  • The Compassion in Dying Federation of America

Organisationen, die Hypothekenbanken unter Druck gesetzt haben, Darlehen an unterkapitalisierte Kreditnehmer zu gewähren, eine Praxis, die zur Immobilienkrise und zum Wohnungsmarkt-Zusammenbruch des Jahres 2008 geführt hat:

Beitragsbild: George Soros während des Jahrestreffens des World Economic Forum in Davos 2010. Wikimedia Creative-Commons-Lizenz 2.0. Copyright by World Economic Forum. swiss-image.ch/Photo by Sebastian Derungs. 

————————————————————————

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qihsX8LbTE4&feature=youtu.be

Demokratie-Missionare als Todesengel – NGOs im Dienste der Kriegstreiber | 10.04.2016 | www.kla.tv

Nichtregierungsorganisationen sind nicht ungefährlicher, nur weil offiziell keine Regierung hinter ihnen steht. Im Gegenteil: Die mächtigsten NGOs der Welt agieren in der Machthierarchie sogar deutlich über einzelnen Regierungen. Mit ihnen sind dann weitere Netzwerke von einflussreichen NGOs verfilzt. Diese schmücken sich jeweils gerne damit, völlig regierungsunabhängig und privat tätig zu sein, z.B. als edle Hilfswerke für eine sogenannte „offene Zivilgesellschaft“ in rückständigen Ländern.
Doch genau da liegt das Problem: Die mächtigsten Kriegstreiber auf Erden sind längst nicht mehr Staaten und Regierungen, sondern diejenigen privaten Gruppen, die diese Staaten und Regierungen an der Leine führen. – In dieser Dokumentation nennen wir Ross und Reiter…

http://www.kla.tv/8061

WICHTIGER HINWEIS: Solange wir nicht gemäss der Interessen und Ideologien des Westens berichten, müssen wir jederzeit damit rechnen, dass YouTube weitere Vorwände sucht um uns zu sperren. Vernetzen Sie sich darum heute noch internetunabhängig!http://www.kla.tv/vernetzung

Sie wollen informiert bleiben, auch wenn der YouTube-Kanal von klagemauer.tv aufgrund weiterer Sperrmassnahmen nicht mehr existiert? Dann verpassen Sie keine Neuigkeiten:http://www.kla.tv/news

von ss.
Quellen/Links:
– http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazi…
– http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/wor…
– http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_u…
– http://www.brookings.edu/about/leader…
– https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookin…
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…
– http://www.crisisgroup.org
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…
– https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council…
– https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members…
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…
– http://www.wnd.com/2008/11/80686/
– https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council…
– http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d…
– https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham…
– https://www.chathamhouse.org/
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…
– http://gotothinktank.com/dev1/wp-cont…
– https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/ch…
– http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_u…
– https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsch…
– https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanti…
– http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.ch/…
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…
– http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazi…
– http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/wor…
– http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.ch/…
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…
– http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.ch/…
– http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.ch/…
– http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachricht…
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…
– http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.ch/…
– http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.ch/…
– http://domiholblog.tumblr.com/post/11…
– http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ch/2011…

Download (3)

Download (4)

————————————————————————————-————

—————————

Russland verbietet zwei weitere amerikanische NGOs

US-Milliardär George Soros

 

Zwei Organisationen des US-Milliardärs George Soros gefährden laut russischer Justiz die Sicherheit und verfassungsmäßige Ordnung des Landes.

  (DiePresse.com)

Für die ohnehin stark unter Druck gesetzte Zivilgesellschaft in Russland ist es ein weiterer Schlag: Laut russischen Medienberichten vom Montag hat die Justiz zwei weitere US-Nichtregierungsorganisationen für „unerwünscht“ erklärt. Betroffen sind demnach die Open Society Foundation und die OSI Assistance Foundation des US-Milliardärs George Soros.

 

Als Begründung nannten die russischen Behörden, die Organisationen würden die verfassungsmäßige Ordnung Russlands und die Sicherheit des Staates gefährden, wie Marina Gridnewa von der Generalstaatsanwaltschaft in Moskau sagte.

Das russische Parlament hatte Anfang Juli eine Prüfung von zwölf NGOs und Stiftungen, unter anderem aus den USA, Polen und der Ukraine, eingeleitet. Seit Ende Mai ist ein Gesetz in Kraft, mit dem NGOs als „unerwünscht“ erklärt werden können – ein Schritt, der national und international scharf kritisiert wurde. Russlands wohl bekannteste Menschenrechtlerin Ljudmila Alexejewa warnte daraufhin vor einer Isolierung Russlands. „Sie werden versuchen, alle ausländischen Organisationen loszuwerden, damit wir im eigenen Saft schmoren“, hatte sie kritisiert.

Moskauer Politiker werfen Soros eine russlandfeindliche Rhetorik sowie Einmischung in die Interessen des Landes vor. Sie beschuldigen den 85-Jährigen unter anderem, die Massenproteste 2013/14 gegen den prorussischen Präsidenten Viktor Janukowitsch in der Ukraine mitfinanziert zu haben.

Die russische Justiz hatte zuvor bereits die vom US-Kongress mitfinanzierte Gruppe National Endowment for Democracy (NED) für „unerwünscht“ erklärt. Die US-Botschaft kritisierte dies. Damit sollten russische Bürger eingeschüchtert werden, sagte ein Sprecher.

Der jüngste Schritt gliedert sich ein in eine inzwischen lange Liste von Repressionsmaßnahmen gegen zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen. Russland hatte in den vergangenen Jahren verstärkt Freiheitsrechte beschnitten. So wurden etwa Nichtregierungsorganisationen (NGO) zu „ausländischen Agenten“ erklärt, die sich mit Geld aus dem Ausland finanzieren. Ihnen wurden die Zuschüsse gestrichen. Seitdem werden nur noch „patriotische“ Organisationen gefördert.

(APA/dpa )

————————————————————————

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2015/december/31/soros-plays-both-ends-in-syria-refugee-chaos/

Soros Plays Both Ends in Syria Refugee Chaos

undefinedSince John D. Rockefeller was advised to protect his wealth from government taxation by creating a tax-exempt philanthropic foundation in 1913, foundations have been used by American oligarchs to disguise a world of dirty deeds under the cover “doing good for mankind,” known by the moniker “philanthropy” for mankind-loving.No less the case is that of George Soros who likely has more tax-exempt foundations under his belt than anyone around. His Open Society foundations are in every country where Washington wants to put ‘their man’ in, or at least get someone out who doesn’t know how to read their music. They played a key role in regime change in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe after 1989. Now his foundations are up to their eyeballs in promoting propaganda serving the US-UK war agenda for destroying stability in Syria as they did in Libya three years ago, creating the current EU refugee crisis.

We should take a closer look at the ongoing Syrian refugee crisis wreaking such havoc and unrest across the EU, especially in Germany, the favored goal of most asylum seekers today. George Soros, today a naturalized American citizen, has just authored a six-point proposal telling the European Union on what they must do to manage the situation. It’s worth looking at in detail.

He begins by stating, “The EU needs a comprehensive plan to respond to the crisis, one that reasserts effective governance over the flows of asylum-seekers so that they take place in a safe, orderly way…” He then says that, “First, the EU has to accept at least a million asylum-seekers annually for the foreseeable future.”

Soros does not elaborate where he pulled that figure from, nor does he discuss the role of other of his Soros-financed NGOs in Syria and elsewhere which manufacture faked propaganda to build a public sympathy lobby for a US and UK “No Fly Zone” in Syria as was done to destroy Libya.

The American hedge fund speculator then adds, among his points to be implemented, a series of proposals that would consolidate a de facto supranational EU state apparatus under control of the faceless, unelected bureaucrats of the European Commission. The Soros proposals call for creating what amount to EU-issued refugee bonds. He states, “The EU should provide €15,000 ($16,800) per asylum-seeker for each of the first two years to help cover housing, health care, and education costs – and to make accepting refugees more appealing to member states. It can raise these funds by issuing long-term bonds using its largely untapped AAA borrowing capacity…”

That issuing comes to 30 billion euros at a time when most EU member states are struggling to deal with domestic economic crises. Soros is generous with other peoples’ money. The mention of the AAA bond rating is the rating of the legal entity named the European Union. Soros has maneuvered for years to try to get a centralized Brussels independent financial power that would take the last vestiges of national financial sovereignty away from Berlin, Paris, Rome and other EU states, part of a scheme to destroy the remains of the national borders and of the nation-state principles established at the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 ending the Thirty Years’ War.

George Soros has more ideas how to spend European citizens’ tax euros. He calls on the EU to cough up an added annual commitment to “frontline countries” (Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan) of at least €8-10 billion annually. Then, insidiously, Soros declares, “Safe channels must be established for asylum-seekers, starting with getting them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. This is very urgent in order to calm the panic.”

‘Destination Countries’

His use of the term “destination countries” is very interesting. Today, by a huge margin that means the Federal Republic of Germany. Soros strategy is obviously to target Germany, especially, with a refugee flood.

It has gradually come out into the open that many of the refugees or asylum-seekers flooding into the EU since summer of 2015 have come in response to reading Twitter or Facebook social media portraying especially Germany as an arms-open, refugee-loving paradise where all their needs will be met.

How did word get out that Germany was the “in place” for those in flight from Syria and other conflict areas? Vladimir Shalak at the Russian Academy of Sciences developed the Internet Content-Analysis System for Twitter (Scai4Twi). He made a study of over 19,000 refugees-related original tweets (retweets discounted). His study showed that the vast majority of the tweets name Germany as the most refugee-welcoming country in Europe.

Shalak’s study discovered that 93 percent  of all tweets about Germany contained positive references to German hospitality and its refugee policy. Some samples of the Tweets:

• Germany Yes! Leftists spray graffiti on a train saying “Welcome, refugees” in Arabic

• Lovely people – video of Germans welcoming Syrian refugees to their community

• Respect! Football fans saying “Welcome Refugees” across stadiums in Germany. _ • This Arabic Graffiti train is running in Dresden welcoming refugees: (ahlan wa sahlan – a warm welcome).

• ‘We love Germany!,’ cry relieved refugees at Munich railway station

• Thousands welcome refugees to Germany – Sky News Australia

• Wherever this German town is that welcomed a coach of Syrian refugees with welcome signs and flowers –thank you.

Now comes the real hammer. The vast majority of these “Germany welcomes refugee” Tweets come not from Germany, but from the United States and from the UK, the two countries up to their necks in the bloody deeds of ISIS and Al Qaeda and countless other terror gangs rampaging across Syria the past four years.

Shalak analyzed 5,704 original tweets containing a “#RefugeesWelcome” hashtag and a country name which welcomes them. It showed almost 80 percent of all Tweets claimed that Germany was the most-welcoming country in Europe. The second most welcoming country found was Austria with 12 percent . However, the study also found that those “Germany welcomes you” Tweets did not originate from inside Germany. Over 40 percent of all the Tweets originated from the USA, UK or Australia. Only 6.4 percent  originated inside Germany.

George Soros is also the Daddy Warbucks financing a new EU think-tank with the name European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). On the website of the ECFR is an editorial titled, “If Europe wants people to stop drowning it needs to let them fly.” The Soros Think-Tank argues that the main reason migrants choose boats is EU Directive 51/2001/EC: “The EU directive was passed in 2001. Put simply, it states that carrier companies—whether airlines or ship lines—are responsible for ensuring that foreign nationals wishing to travel to the European Union have valid travel documents for their destination. If such travelers arrive in the EU and are turned away, the airlines are obligated to foot the bill for flying them home.” In other words, “open the gates of heaven wider, dear Lord.”

Soros’ Syria NGOs Beat War Drums

The cynicism of the Soros call for the EU taxpayers to step up to the plate and accept millions of new refugees, to fly them in without papers, and more, is clear when we look at the same Soros-financed network of NGOs active in Syria trying to create the propaganda background to get acceptance of yet another US “No Fly Zone” over Syria as was done against Iraq after 1991 and against Libya in 2012 to bomb those countries back to the stone age.

One of the key online advocates for a US-UK “No Fly Zone” over Syria, something the Russian intervention since September 30 has de facto blocked, is an organization known as Avaaz. Avaaz was given initial financial support by Soros’ foundation in 2007 to promote key policies suitable to the US State Department. They cite Soros’ Open Society foundation as their foundation partner. Avaaz played a key role promoting the 2011 No Fly Zone in Libya that introduced a regime of terror and chaos in that once prosperous and stable African nation. Avaaz is now very actively promoting the same treatment for Syria.

Another Soros-financed NGO active demonizing the Assad government as cause of all atrocities in Syria and helping build public support for a war in Syria from the US and EU is Amnesty International. Suzanne Nossel, until 2013 the Executive Director of Amnesty International USA, came to the job from the US State Department where she was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, not exactly an unbiased agency in regard to Syria. As well, the Soros-financed Human Rights Watch has played a major role in falsely portraying ISIS and Al Qaeda civilian bombings and other atrocities as the work of the Assad regime, building support for military action from the US and EU.

The Middle East and other wars today including Ukraine are the product of the foreign policy doctrine set out in 1992 by then Defense Assistant Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, the infamous Wolfowitz Doctrine that justifies “pre-emptive” war, free from any oversight from the UN Security Council, against any nation or group of nations which threaten US “Sole Superpower” domination. George Soros, the hedge fund speculator turned self-proclaimed philanthropist, and his tax-exempt foundations, are an integral part of that pre-emptive war machine. Now Soros lectures the EU countries, above all Germany, on how they should receive the human fallout from the wars he and his cronies in the US State Department have created. That’s real Chutzpah, or perhaps it is really hubris.

Reprinted with permission from New Eastern Outlook.

————————————————————————————-————

————————————————————————————————————————————–

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: https://alexandrabader.wordpress.com/2016/04/04/panama-papers-mit-george-soros-gegen-wladimir-putin/

Panama Papers: Mit George Soros gegen Wladimir Putin

Die “Gatekeeper” der Konzernmedien schützen die reichsten 1%  des Westens vor den “Panama Papers” betitelt der ehemalige britische Botschafter in Usbekistan Craig Murray einen aktuellen Blogeintrag. Ehe man reflexhaft Artikel der “Süddeutschen” oder des “Falter” auf Facebook teilt, sollte man sich ansehen, wer hinter dem “Leak” steckt.

Aus Österreich waren “Falter” und ORF im Rechercheverbund des “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, das unter anderem von der Ford Foundation oder den Open Society Foundations des George Soros unterstützt wird. Auf der Webseite der APA gibt es bereits ein Top-thema Panama Papers unter anderem mit derPressemeldung der beiden Medien: “Das Datenleck in der Größe von 2,6 Terabyte ist zehnmal so groß, wie der Datensatz, der in der so genannten ‘Offshore-Leaks Affäre‘ öffentlich wurde. Er stammt aus der Kanzlei eines der weltweit größten Anbieter von Briefkastenfirmen, der in Panama residierenden Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Mossack & Fonseca. Alleine diese Kanzlei setzte 214.000 Briefkastenfirmen in Steueroasen auf, die den Reichen, aber auch Staatschefs, Politikern und Kriminellen dazu diente, Geld vor dem Fiskus zu verstecken oder Schmiergelder zu bunkern.

Aufgrund der Daten ist es erstmals möglich, die wahren wirtschaftlichen Eigentümer der Briefkastenfirmen zu identifizieren. Die Süddeutsche Zeitung koordinierte gemeinsam mit dem renommierten US-Amerikanischen International Consortium for Investigative Journalists (ICIJ.org) das globale Rechercheprojekt, an dem mehr als 400 Journalisten von mehr als 80 Medienunternehmen beteiligt waren (darunter Le Monde, Guardian und die BBC).”  Die Meldung suggeriert Zugang zur gesamten gigantischen Datenmenge, allerdings exklusiv auf wenige auserwwählte Medien beschränkt, was an die Vorgangsweise von Wikileaks bei den US-Botschaftsdepeschen im Herbst 2010 erinnert. Tatsächlich fragte Wikileaks in sozialen Medien, ob die gesamte Menge an Daten ins Netz gestellt werden soll oder ob man sie Medien übergibt, die sich dann die Rosinen herauspicken.

Um welche Rosinen es sich wohl handeln wird, macht Craig MurraysBlogeintrag klar: “But why focus on Russia? Russian wealth is only a tiny minority of the money hidden away with the aid of Mossack Fonseca. In fact, it soon becomes obvious that the selective reporting is going to stink. The Suddeutsche Zeitung, which received the leak, gives a detailed explanation of the methodology the corporate media used to search the files. The main search they have done is for names associated with breaking UN sanctions regimes. The Guardian reports this too and helpfully lists those countries as Zimbabwe, North Korea, Russia and Syria. The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western billionaires – the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that ‘much of the leaked material will remain private’. What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named ‘International Consortium of Investigative Journalists’, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, Rockefeller Family Fund, W K Kellogg Foundation, Open Society Foundation (Soros) among many others. Do not expect a genuine expose of western capitalism. The dirty secrets of western corporations will remain unpublished.”

Der deutsche Blog Blauer Bote fragt zu Recht; “Wundert es eigentlich noch jemanden, dass der Name ‘Putin’ sage und schreibe 11 Mal in dem Hauptartikel der Süddeutschen Zeitung zu dem Skandal auftaucht, obwohl – und das heißt es zwischendurch selbst in dem Artikel – der Name des russischen Staatspräsidenten in den Panama-Unterlagen gar nicht auftaucht?” Als am Abend des 3. April 2016 zahlreiche UserInnen auf Facebook zum “Falter” und zur “Süddeutschen” verlinkten, postete ich einen Hinweis zu den Sponsoren des Journalisten-Konsortiums und stellte dabei fest, dass automatisch ein Bild von Putin mit gesenktem Kopf eingebaut wurde, was offenbar das Hauptthema dieses von US-Stiftungen finanzierten Netzwerks ist. Wer sich mit der Einflussnahme via Stiftungen befasst, ist nicht überrascht, wenn sich Netzwerke und Plattformen in anderen Netzwerken verstecken, denn bei den “Panama Papers” spielt auch das Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project eine Rolle: “The OCCRP project has been, or is, supported by grants from the United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Open Society Foundations. Also on this site are projects funded in part or done in partnership with other organizations including SCOOP, the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). OCCRP is a registered name of the Journalism Development Network, a Maryland-based charitable organization (501(c)3).”

USAID ist US-Aussenministerium und praktisch CIA, wie ironischer Weise ausgerechnet das Soros-unterstützte alternative Fernsehprogramm Democracy Now! betont. Die Vorgangsweise von US-Stiftungen ist an das National Endowment for Democracy angelehnt, mit dem in dne 1980er Jahren CIA-Aktivitäten “privatisiert” wurden; gerade wenn es um die Open Society Foundations geht, ist dieser Vergleich zutreffend, da auf diese Weise Staaten unterminiert werden, indem man “die” Zivilgesellschaft kapert, wie ich in vielen Beispielen anhand von Österreich dargestellt habe. Es mag paradox klingen, aber die Strategie wird zugleich offen und verdeckt verfolgt. Der Widerspruch löst sich jedoch auf, wenn man bedenkt, dass AgentInnen von Geheimdiensten keineswegs nur Hollywood-Klischee-gemäss unter falschem Namen mit Tarnidentität tätig sind wie Edward Snowden, als er in der Schweiz für die CIA arbeitete. Einige arbeiten vor aller Augen unter eigenen Namen in offiziellen Berufen, dienen jedoch eigentlich einem Geheimdienst.

Österreich-Bezug hat zum einen das zeitliche Zusammentreffen des Besuchs von Bundespräsident Heinz Fischer und Aussenminister Sebastian Kurz in der Russischen Föderation von 5. bis 6. April 2016, zum anderen die enthüllte Rolle von Raiffeisen etwa beiden Deals des ukrainischen Präsidenten. Und es ist sicher kein Zufall, dass in der via US-Stiftungen instrumentalisierten Willkommenswinker-Szene seit ein paar Wochen Sujets auftauchen, die sich gegen “Superreiche” richten und suggerieren, das theoretisch genug Geld dafür vorhanden wäre, “Schutzsuchende” ohne Ende in einem Land mit begrenzter Fläche, begrenztem Wohnraum, einer halben Million einheimischer Arbeitsloser etc. zu versorgen. “Die Süddeutsche-Redakteure Bastian Obermayer und Frederik Obermaier haben den größten Datenschatz der Geschichte gehoben. Und wollen damit die Welt ein bisschen verbessern”, schreibt der “Falter”, ohne uns mitzuteilen, dass auch beim Rechercheprojekt geheimerkrieg.de genau diese Journalisten federführend beteiligt waren.

“Geheimer Krieg” schien oberflächlich betrachtet zu enthüllen, diente jedoch auch dazu, die deutsche Politik in die Ecke zu drängen, weil sie duldete, dass die Airbase Ramstein wichtige Relaisstation im Drohnenkrieg ist.Bedenkt man, dass jene Medien, die in Deutschland und Österreich Partner amerikanischer, von US-Stiftungen finanzierter Journalistennetzwerke sind, gegen Putin und für “refugees” agitieren, wird klar, dass sie immer eine fremde Agenda verfolgen. Obwohl wie erwähnt Putin selbst gar nicht vorkommt, geht es darum, ihm einen Strick aus seinen “besten Freunden” zu drehen. Das erste Video, welches der “Falter” zu den “Panama Papers” anbietet, ist eine Animation, die Putin zeigt, wie er einem Freund einen Sack Geld übergibt, den dieser verstecken soll.

Wenn man sich nicht mehr darüber wundert, dass die Caritas für das Hereinwinken endloser Ströme von Menschen nach Österreich ist (und weiss, dass die Caritas Europa im Soros-unterstützten Europäischen Flüchtlingsrat ist), ist der Focus von Caritas-PräsidentMichael Landauauf Facebook nicht weiter überraschend. So teilt er am 4. April zu Mittag ein Bild von “Falter”-Chefredakteur Florian Klenk (der am 3. April bei “Im Zentrum” im ORF über die “Panama Papers” diskutierte), mit dem der neue “Falter” angekündigt wird. Während die Zeitschrift sonst aber eher wenig Print-Inhalte ins Netz stellt, gibt es jetztreichlich Infosin Sachen “Panama Papers”. Am 3. April postete Landau abends: “Es geht um Geld, offensichtlich auch aus Österreich. Und morgen werden wir wieder hören, dass man bei der Mindestsicherung sparen muss…Neiddebatten auf dem Rücken der Armen. Widerlich. 5800 Milliarden Euro sollen in Offshore-Firmen gebunkert sein, das behauptet zumindest der renommierte Steueroasen-Forscher Gabriel Zucman, ein Schüler des Star-ökonomen Thomas Piketty. 5800 Milliarden, deren Früchte, also Zinsen, für den Bau von Schulen, Krankenhäusern oder Infrastruktur investiert werden könnten.”

Dabei geht es beim Thema “Mindestsicherung” zunächst einmal um sog. Flüchtlinge, keineswegs aber um Einheimische, denen gegenüber der Staat die Verpflichtung hat, den Sozialstaat aufrechtzuerhalten. Auch die Ankündigung der ORF-Berichterstattung in Sachen Panama teilte Landau auf Facebook, der ansonsten nicht müde wird, gegen verfassungskonformes Vorgehen der Regierung zu wettern. Dies etwa dann, wenn mit der Begründung der Aufrechterhaltung der öffentlichen Ordnung und Sicherheit der Zuzug nach Österreich unter dem in der Regel nur selten zutreffenden Label Asyl eingeschränkt wird, was übrigens auch die Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention vorsieht. Der grüne EU-Abgeordnete Michel Reimon, der offen dazu aufruft, mit Bolzenschneidern gegen Zäune vorzugehen, äussert sich per Presseaussendung und auf Facebook zu den “Panama Papers”, unter anderem, indem er ein Posting der Grazer Grünen Tina Wirnsberger teilt, das die Sprachregelung nicht nur in der Partei auf den Punkt bringen dürfte:; “Was haben Offshore-Deals mit Flüchtenden und Kriminalitätsopfern zu tun? Victims of Offshore ‪#‎panamapapers‬” verbunden mit diesem Video:

Vor vier Jahren schrieb Global Research: “This month is the twenty third anniversary of the US invasion of Panama on 20th December 1989, as Panamanians prepared their Christmas celebrations. A quick check reminds the late Philip Agee recalling President George H.W. Bush telling the American people that the threat from Panama (pop: 3,571,185 – 2011) was such that: ‘our way of life is at stake.’ Agee referred to this in his aptly named talk ‘Producing the Proper Crisis.’ Apt then as now. Nothing changes.The aim of the invasion was to capture the country’s leader General Manuel Noriega and, of course, to: ‘establish a democratic government.’ Regime change.” Was der ehemalige und mittlerweile verstorbene CIA-Agent und Whistleblower meinte, hatte auch damit zu tun, dass die Kontrolle über den Panamakanal Panama übergeben werden hätte müssen: “With the approaching transfer of control of the Panama Canal to Panama (originally scheduled for 1st January  1990) after a century of US colonial stewardship, America wanted to ensure it was in the hands of malleable allies.

Noriega a CIA asset, since 1967 who had also attended the notorious School of the Americas, at Fort Benning, Georgia, came to power with US backing, but seemingly his support for the US was cooling. To encapsulate a long story, the US kidnapped him and sentenced him to forty years in jail. Plans to invade were called: ‘Operation Prayer Book.’ It was later re-named ‘Operation Just Cause’, with General Colin Powell commenting that it was a moniker of which he approved as: ‘Even our severest critics would have to utter *Just Cause* whilst denouncing us.’ (Colin Powell, with Jospeh E. Persico: “My American Journey”, 1995.)” Wie der “regime change”, wie man den Überfall auf ein fremdes Land in offener oder / und verdeckter Kriegsführung heute nannt abgelaufen ist, wird so beschrieben: “Twenty seven thousand US troops backed by Apache helicopters decimated much of the small country, with a defence force of just three thousand. George Bush Snr., said he was removing an evil dictator who was brutalizing his own people  (sound familiar?) and that the action was needed to:’protect American lives.’ It was also to: ‘defend democracy and human rights in Panama’ – and to ‘protect the Canal.’ Surprise, eh?

Manuel Noriega was released from US jail in 2007, extradited to France which had awarded him the country’s highest honour, The Legion d’honneur in 1987. He remained in jail in France until December 2011, when he was returned to Panama, where he is still imprisoned. In the near forgotten Panama decimation (unless you are Panamanian) the densely populated, poverty stricken neighbourhood of El Chorillo was incinerated by American actions to such an extent that it became named ‘Little Hiroshima.’ One woman charged that: ‘The North Americans began burning down El Chorillo at about 6.30 in the morning. They would throw a small device in to a house and it would catch on fire – then they would move to another, they burned from one street to the next, coordinating the burning on walkie-talkies.’ A US soldier was recorded stating: ‘“We ask you to surrender … if you do not, we are prepared to level each and every building.’ ‘Everything that moved they shot’, said a city resident.The dead were consigned to mass graves with witnesses stating that US troops used flame throwers on the dead, noting the bodies shriveling as they burned. Others were bulldozed in to piles.”

Es erweist sich als verhängnisvoll, nur an regime change-Szenarien im lateinamerikanischen “Hinterhof” der USA zu denken oder an den Nahen Osten und auszublenden, dass Methoden der Täuschung der Bevölkerung, des Aufwiegelns und Instrumentalisierens auch bei uns angewendet werden, wie man im Übrigen an den Farb- oder Themenrevolutionen sehen kann. Es gibt Verbindungen zu US-Stiftungen, transatlantische “freie” Presse, Social Media-Kampagnen mit Hashtags und überall auftauchenden Sprüchen, Bildern, geteilten Postings, die sich gegen eine den eigenen staatlichen Interessen entsprechende Politik wenden. Sowohl “refugees” als auch AktivistInnen werden benutzt, wie man z.B. im griechischen Idomeni sehen kann. Am Wochenende gingen DemonstrantInnen am Brenner mit dem vorfabrizierten Slogan “OpentheFortress” gegen österreichische Polizei vor und wurden im Netz bejubelt. Provokationen seitens der Bauern auf dem Schachbrett der Stiftungen amerikanischer “Superreicher”, die staatliche Strukturen als Profithindernisse beseitigen wollen, sollen wohl zu unüberschaubaren Situationen führen, in denen man Sicherheitskräften die Schuld an Toten und Verletzten geben kann, damit sich eine pseudokritische Masse gegen die Regierungen erhebt…

————————————————————————————-————

Und noch aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: https://deutsch.rt.com/international/35837-russland-raumt-auf-nach-scientology/

Russland räumt auf: Nach Scientology wird nun auch Soros rausgeschmissen

George Soros

George Soros
Die russische Staatsanwaltschaft hat das Open Society Institute und damit verbundene Organisationen des Finanzmagnaten George Soros für unerwünscht erklärt. Die Mitarbeit in den Soros-Organisationen steht für Russen künftig unter Strafe, da diese Aktivitäten – so die russische Justiz – die Verfassung Russlands bedrohen. Zahlreiche Analysten werfen Soros vor, eine besonders aktive Rolle beim Maidan-Putsch in der Ukraine gespielt zu haben.

Nachdem ein Moskauer Gericht vergangene Woche weitere Aktivitäten von Scientology in Russland untersagt hat und der sogenannten „Kirche“ eine sechsmonatige Frist setzte, das Land zu verlassen, wird es nun auch zunehmend ungemütlich für die berüchtigten Soros-Stiftungen im Land.

Quelle: RT

In einer Stellungnahme vom Montag erklärte die russische Staatsanwaltschaft, die Aktivitäten des sogenannten Open Society Institute und der Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation bedrohen die Verfassung und nationale Sicherheit des Landes. Trotz der wohlklingenden Namen dienen Organisationen wie das Open Society Institute vor allem der Durchsetzung transatlantischer Interessen und folgen dem Konzept der „soft power“. Anders als bei klassischer militärischer Aggression zielen NGOs wie die von Soros oder die die US-amerikanische halbstaatliche und CIA-nahe NED-Stiftung vor allem auf zivilgesellschaftliche Einflussnahme und Destabilisierung.

Zum jüngsten Verbot der Soros-Gruppen zählt das Schließen von Büros, das Einfrieren der Finanzmittel und die das Untersagen der Verbreitung von Materialien der NGO.

Der umtriebige Finanzinvestor George Soros ist auf diesem Feld besonders aktiv. In der Regel deckt sich Soros vermeintliches Engagement für „freie Gesellschaften“ jedoch mit eigenen Profitinteressen und richtet sich vor allem gegen Regierungshandeln das diesen im Wege steht. Auch beim Staatsstreich in der Ukraine im vergangenen Jahr spielten Soros-Stiftungen vor allem im Bereich des medialen Framings eine äußerst aktive Rolle.

Der faktische Rausschmiss der Soros-Organisationen aus Russland ist Folge eines Gesetzes, das der russische Senat im Juli dieses Jahres verabschiedete. Auf einer „patriotischen Stopp-Liste“ sind seit dem zwölf NGOs gelistet, die in Russland als unerwünscht gelten. Sieben US-amerikanische NGOs mit explizit politischem Auftrag, zwei ukrainische Diaspora-Gruppen, zwei polnische NGOs und eine selbsternannte Menschenrechtsgruppe, die auf der Halbinsel Krim ansässig ist.

Quelle: Team 29

Zu den namenhaftesten dieser Gruppen zählt neben der Open Society Foundation, der MacArthur Foundation und dem National Endowment for Democracy auch der US-amerikanische Think Tank Freedom House.

Am vergangenen Montag hat zudem das Moskauer Amtsgericht auf Antrag des russischen Justizministeriums angeordnet, die Moskauer Filiale von Scientology zu schließen. Der Beschluss besagt, dass die Organisation die Religionsfreiheit für andere Zwecke missbrauche. Nun hat die Moskauer Niederlassung von Scientology offiziell sechs Monate Zeit, ihre Aktivitäten einzustellen.

In der Analyse „Was ist Scientology? Die Fabrikation der Mensch-Maschine im kybernetischen Lernlabor“ untersucht Dr. Jürgen Keltsch die Funktionsweise der Gruppierung. Darin heißt es unter anderem:

„Das lückenlose Kommando- und Kontrollsystem behandelt den Menschen als Objekt und nicht als Person mit Menschenwürde und Menschenrechten.“

Ein Ziel der Gruppe sei auch die soziale Umerziehung und „Umprogrammierung“ der Gesellschaft, bei der gezielt verhaltenspsychologische Methodiken angewendet bzw. missbraucht werden. Keltsch weiter:

„Die zitierten Quellen (HCO PL) zeigen, dass das Endziel des Spitzenmangements der Organisation die Abschaffung der demokratischen Werteordnung und die Verwandlung der Gesellschaft in ein technokratisches System (Cyberfaschismus) ist.“

—————————————————————————————–

 

————————————————————————————-————

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen:

http://www.earstohear.net/SOROS.HTML

EarsToHear.net 
He That Has Ears To Hear, Let Him Hear  (Matthew 11:15-30)
Challenging both secular wisdom and religious doctrines. – Will our descendants know moral virtue?

Home | Search | Newsletter | Contact

Please Note: Some visitors are mistakenly thinking EarsToHear.net supports George Soros and his devastating agenda simply because this page exists. However, please be  diligent and read at least the introduction below, as EarsToHear.net is bringing awareness to the devastating agenda George Soros is promoting.

George Soros<align=“center“> – Enemy of the Free Market

Revealing the evil deceptive ploys and tactics of George Soros, progressive liberals, Marxists, Communists, Socialists, et. al. all to create a One World Government of unrepresentative control, in the same manner Radical Islam wants to create a caliphate.

Top 10 Reasons George Soros Is Dangerous by Human Events – Human Events‘ readers, in an online poll, recently voted billionaire financier George Soros „the single most destructive leftist demagogue in the country.“  Here are the Top 10 Reasons George Soros Is Dangerous: 
…1.  Gives billions to left-wing causes:  
…2.  Influence on U.S. elections: 
…3.  Wants to curtail American sovereignty:  
…4.  Media Matters:  
…5.  MoveOn.org:   
…6.  Center for American Progress:  
…7.  Environmental extremism:  
…8.  America Coming Together:  
…9.  Currency manipulation:  
..10.  Delusions:

How George Soros Singlehandedly Created The European Refugee Crisis – And Why – By Tyler Durden – The globalist seed was sowed for young George by his father, Tivadar, a Jewish lawyer who was a strong proponent of Esperanto. Esperanto is a language created in 1887 by L.L. Zamenhof, a Polish eye doctor, for the purpose of “transcending national borders” and “overcoming the natural indifference of mankind.” Tivadar taught young George Esperanto and forced him to speak it at home. In 1936, as Hitler was hosting the Olympics in Berlin, Tivadar changed the family name from Schwartz to Soros, an Esperanto word meaning “will soar.” …Allegedly, in 1944, 14-year-old George Soros went to work for the invading Nazis. It is said that until the end of the war in 1945, he worked with a government official, helping him confiscate property from the local Jewish population. In an 1998 interview with 60 Minutes, Soros described the year of German occupation as “the happiest time in my life.“
   …The Currency Speculations That Threw Britain and Asia into Crisis – In the 1990s, Soros began a string of large bets against national currencies. The first was in 1992, when he sold short the pound sterling and made a $1 billion profit in a single day. His next big currency speculation came in 1997. This time Soros singled out the Thai baht and, with heavy short-selling volume, destroyed the baht’s artificial peg to the US dollar, which started the Asian financial crisis.

Globalist George Soros Fears Nationalist Donald Trump… – by sundance – Evidence of the political pendulum swinging back to favor nationalists can be found amid the panic of globalists like George Soros.  The godfather, and primary financier, of current global liberalism has penned an op-ed in the Guardian trying to convince Americans to vote against our own best interests. Soros is the most famous totalitarian globalist in the last two decades.  Darth Soros despises freedom, hates individual liberty, and absolutely abhors the U.S. Constitution. Soros views candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz as members of a nationalist rebel alliance who must be stopped at all costs. … […] As 2016 gets underway, we must reaffirm our commitment to the principles of open society and resist the siren song of the likes of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, however hard that may be.  ~ George Soros

Organizations Funded Directly by George Soros and his Open Society Institute – George Soros (born August 12, 1930, as György Schwartz, in BudapestHungary), is one of the wealthiest people in the world (rated number 35 in 2010) and is a leading funder and organizer for progressive organizations and progressive causes. He is a proclaimed atheist. Soros is the Chairman of Soros Fund Management, LLC and founder of The Open Society Institute. Soros claims his political activities are separate from the Open Society Institute.[1] He is a former member of the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign RelationsVisit the main page on George Soros here…

The Soros-funded Democracy Alliance is the most dangerous political group in America. – From the Washington Post, full size image found here.

WHO IS FUNDING AND LEADING BLACK LIVES MATTER? – ByBARBARA J. STOCK – In case there are people who don’t know, Black Lives Matter is funded by George Soros. Soros supports Hillary and supported Obama as well. Soros also funded Moveon.org. In fact, George Soros and the Clintons have a long and cozy history. In a 1995 interview with Charlie Rose on PBS, Soros admitted how he controls politics in the this country…or tries to. “I like to influence policy. I was not able to get to George Bush (GHWB). But now I think I have succeeded with my influence…I do now have great access in the (Clinton) administration. There is no question about this. We actually work together as a team.” 
   …But the Soros influence isn’t the only reason Obama is saying nothing about the open-season on law enforcement that has been declared by Black Lives Matter. This group has been infiltrated and perhaps taken over by the Black Panthers, a radical Muslim group. It was the Black Panthers, the Nation of Islam and a man named Malik Zulu Shabazz, the head of Black Lawyers for Justice, who organized the protests in Ferguson. A man from the Nation of Islam was there directing all of them and teaching them “the art of war.”

For Soros, Coal Stocks Are Suddenly a Hot Commodity – By Jordan Candler – Every time environmental blowhards like Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio embark on climate apocalyptic speech tours, they are rightly called out by critics for amassing needless carbon footprints. They call religiously for the world to abolish its addiction to fossil fuels, yet they live in lavish homes and travel on luxurious jets powered by so-called “dirty energy.” Why? Because they’re in it for another kind of green in the form of dollar bills.
    The same hypocritical mindset applies to George Soros, the billionaire hedge fund manager who provides financial backing to slews of left-wing advocacy groups. But like fellow leftists Gore and DiCaprio, Soros‘ disdain for fossil fuels is dwarfed by his love for money. Fox News reports, “Soros, whose Climate Policy Initiative think tank recently urged the world to stop using fossil fuels in general and coal in particular, snapped up 1 million shares of Peabody Energy and half a million shares of Arch Coal, giving him significant stakes in what’s left of the U.S. coal industry.”
    Peabody was trading at roughly $90 a share when Obama first entered the Oval Office. Today, trading is an abysmal $1 a share. As Heartland Institute’s Sterling Burnett points out, Soros may have an ulterior motive in mind. “If he buys enough stock to have controlling interests in these coal businesses, closes them down and leaves the coal in the ground,” says Burnett, “we might accept that he is a true believer, that his investment was all about stopping climate change and saving the environment. But my suspicion is that he helped to drive stocks down, bought as many shares as he can, and, when stocks rebound, he can sell his shares and make a huge profit.” Considering the numerous groups he bankrolls, we’d put our money on the latter scenario.

Soros Next Generation Steps Up – Children of Liberal Icon Make Own Political Mark By Josh Nathan-Kazis – In the 2012 election cycle, the biggest single political donation made by a Soros didn’t come from George. The progressive hedge fund billionaire was outdone by his 26-year-old son, Alexander, who in March wrote a $200,000 check to the Democratic-leaning super PAC responsible for the 2008 Great Schlep campaign backing then presidential candidate Barack Obama. The elder Soros still outpaces his second-youngest child in overall political giving, according to Federal Election Commission records. But Alexander Soros’s major gift may point to a generational shift in the philanthropic and political efforts of the Soros family. As George Soros enters his 80s, the five children of the controversial Hungarian-born Jewish investor appear to be emerging from their father’s long shadow. Alexander Soros In the lead is Alexander who, in addition to his super PAC gift, has announced the launch of his own foundation. Jonathan Soros, 41, Alexander’s half-brother, also drew attention in April for his support of a new effort to introduce public financing of elections in New York State.

Jonathan Soros – You may already know the name George Soros, but did you know that this billionaire turned liberal bankroller is passing on his affinity for progressive causes to his son, Jonathan? The liberal media desperately tried to conceal his more than $2 million in donations to liberal candidates and causes. Jonathan Soros has served as vice chairman and director of the board of the Open Society Foundation, his father’s multi-billion dollar organization that has given $58 billion to blatantly liberal organizations. Yet the liberal media try to paint him as an advocate for removing money from politics and political races!

SOROS PUSHING OBAMA SCHEME TO SHUT DOWN COAL By LEO HOHMANN – ‚Most aggressive plan by any president ever‘ – The new EPA regulations on power plants would result in millions of lost jobs while forcing consumers to pay more for their electricity, critics say. The EPA is accepting public comments on the proposed rules through Dec. 1 but the White House has decided to bypass Congress on the issue.Organizing for Action, funded by billionaire investor George Soros, Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes and other progressive rainmakers, asks recipients of the email to “Stand with the President” by submitting a public comment to the EPA before the deadline passes.

The Contents Of This Soros‘ Backed Group’s Playbook To Take Over America Will Leave You Shocked (June 2014) – By Mike Ciandella – According to a recently published briefing book „obtained by Politico“ by the liberal megadonor group Democracy Alliance, „progressives‘ long term success hinges on our ability to fundamentally change our current political system – including large questions about who can vote, the role money should play in politics, and what our courts look like.“
   The briefing, a report card of 2013’s challenges and accomplishments for the organization, said that the George Soros founded and funded Democracy Alliance is „more than capable of turning back the latest threats from the Right.“ According to Politico, the briefing book was provided to Democracy Alliance donors „ahead of April’s annual spring meeting.“
   The Democracy Alliance is a membership group that directs funding to a wide variety of liberal causes. It was created to consolidate the efforts of wealthy liberal donors such as George Soros, Tom Steyer and Robert Mckay. The report paid „particular attention“ to „the successful examples of alignment that have developed over the last three years and highlight additional opportunities that could further advance our collective visions of a stronger democracy and more progressive America.“
   The document highlighted 21 organizations the Alliance viewed as success stories. These „successes“ included items like:
    – „Met goal to coordinate campaigns to block conservatives agendas“ (America Votes),
   – „Met goal to promote progressive vision of the law“ (American Constitution Society),
   – „Met goal to advance progressive state policies“ (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities).
   Another highlighted group, Progressive Majority, boasted that it helped „elect 60 progressives and flip six local governments“ in 2013 alone.
   Towards the end of the document is a list of 172 liberal groups that the Democracy Alliance encouraged its supporters to donate to, entitled „Progressive Infrastructure Map Spring 2014.“ A footnote on this list states that „[O]ver the last nine years, many of the organizations previously recommended for support by the Democracy Alliance have played instrumental roles in building a stronger, more integrated progressive infrastructure.“ These 172 groups cover a wide range of left-wing issues such as gun control, LGBT activism, pro-choice activism and climate change alarmism.

BMI Special Report George Soros (8/17/2011): Media Mogul Left Businessman Spends Millions Funding Journalism Read theexecutive summary or the full report Read sidebar: Top Journalists that Serve on Soros-Funded Boards

Since 2003, anti-American billionaire George Soros has spent more than$52 million funding media properties, and he has direct ties to more than30 news outlets—including The New York Times, The Washington Post,the Associated Press, CNN, and ABC. In keeping with his hard-left socialist vision for America, Soros goes after this the best way he knows how—through accessing and controlling the „news“ media. And if that weren’t enough, George Soros has now accepted a position on the National Finance Council of the Ready for Hillary Super PAC, a group paving the way for a 2016 presidential run for the former first lady. If the MRC doesn’t expose Soros and neutralize these efforts, who knows where we’ll be!

Connections: George Soros has direct or once-removed relationships with 2,074 people, organizations or other entities in our database of the most influential people in America. Under a scoring system that gives more weight to direct links, this score is higher than 99% of all entries. Click here for interactive map of connections.

Obama Stimulus Dollars Funded Soros Empire (April 17, 2012) Newly recently released tax documents, examined and analyzed by Tina Trent of www.sorosfiles.com, reveal how billionaire „philanthropist“ George Soros expanded his U.S.-based empire by using funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the Obama stimulus. Soros and Obama worked hand-in-glove through the stimulus, which has been called the largest single partisan wealth transfer in American history.

Be sure to see the George Soros accomplices and their supporting tactics: 
1. SorosFiles.com –  A project of America’s Survival, Inc. (ASI). 
2. The Progressive Liberal Agenda
2. The Progressive Politically Correct Dictionary of clever terms of contradiction used to dupe the unsuspecting „We the sheeple“ into relinquishing the freedom and „Rights“ of „We the People.“ 
3. GEORGE SOROS-FUNDED COMMUNIST ORGANIZATIONS 
4. Organizations Funded Directly by George Soros and his Open Society Institute By Discover The Networks Organizations that, in recent years, have received direct funding and assistance from George Soros and his Open Society Institute (OSI) include the following. (Comprehensive profiles of each are available in the „Groups“ section ofDiscoverTheNetworks.org):

Soros, Leftist Honchos Meet in Miami to Plot 2012 Breitbart.com – In May the Biltmore Hotel in Miami hosted a gathering of left-wing muckety-mucks plotting their strategy for the 2012 election cycle. The group hosting the meet-up was the Democracy Alliance, a 2005-created organization of high-powered liberal billionaires. As the Washington Free Beacon reports: Attendees roamed the grounds at the 150-acre tropical resort on their way to cocktail gatherings, salsa dance lessons, and workshops such as “Occupy the Voting Booth” and “The 1 Percent Rule.” Local police guarded entrances as members attended a “partners only” meeting in the hotel’s Country Club Courtyard. George Soros showed up to party, as did Andy Stern, former SEIU president. Ari Rabin-Havt, executive vice president of Media Matters for America, walked around talking about his latest chat with Stephanie Cutter, deputy campaign manager for President Obama. Members of the Center for American Progress also showed up. This was a 1% gathering – a planning operation for the other 99%. And we will see its impact in the months to come.

Soros-funded „civil rights“ group in NY sues Pastor Scott Lively for ‚crimes against humanity.‘ Huge international lawsuit on behalf of homosexual activists in Uganda! Files 47-page lawsuit in federal court on the basis of pro-family speeches in foreign country! High-profile attack on religious expression is beginning. …The accusation: What really happened when Scott Lively was in Uganda? The contortions being used against Lively — versus what really happened – are quite astounding. In 2009, Lively was invited to Uganda to speak at a pro-family conference on the destructive nature of homosexuality and the aggressive nature of the homosexual movement. (He had also been there in 2002.) At least one member of the Uganda Parliament attended the conference and also spoke personally with Lively and others there about the issue. He was then invited to briefly address the Ugandan Parliament. Of particular concern to the officials was the issue of homosexuals targeting children. …The absurd „legal“ case against Lively – We had planned to do a point-by-point refutation of the charges against Lively in the 47-page lawsuit. But that would be too big a project. Almost every line contains some kind of ridiculous assertion or twisted logic attempting to connect Lively to real or imagined horrors in Uganda. In particular, they take statements he made completely out of context (if he made those statements at all) and try to create a powerful monster who upended the country out of a minor pastor from the US who simply came and spoke at a pro-family conference and before the Parliament. We’ve never seen anything quite like it.

George Soros: The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly Decline Of The Dollar, The Coming Gl (theeconomiccollapseblog.com) Video of George Soros talking about the creation of a New World Order, he discusses the need for a managed decline of the U.S.

Obama’s Exclusive George Soros Waivers By Michelle Malkin – „Millionaires and billionaires,“ President Obama says derisively, must make more „sacrifices“ and live by the same rules the rest of America lives by. But there are seven little words that will never appear on the White House teleprompter: „And that means you, too, George Soros.“ For all his (and his wife’s) bashing of greedy Wall Street hedge-fund managers, Obama has shown nothing but love to the world’s most famous hedge-fund mogul.

The feeling is mutual and deep(-pocketed). Soros and his family shelled out $250,000 for Obama’s inauguration, $60,000 in direct campaign contributions and untold millions more to liberal activist groups pushing the White House agenda. While the class warrior-in-chief assails conniving financiers who exploit loopholes and corporate titans who imperil the planet, he lets the Soros exemptions to his attack-the-rich rules slide like butter on a hot plate.

This week, for example, Soros announced he was „quitting“ the hedge-fund industry. The headlines emphasized his decision to return about $750 million to outside investors (a drop in his $30 billion bucket of personal wealth). He’s reconstituting the business that landed him on Forbes magazine’s „wealthiest people“ list as a „family“ interest. But the move has „self-serving politics“ written all over it. Over the past year, Soros provided coveted support for Obama and the Democrats‘ Byzantine financial „reforms“ under the sweeping Dodd-Frank law. He preached to financial publications around the world about the need for increased regulatory controls over his industry. And in November 2008, while paying obligatory lip service to concerns about going too far, he submitted a statement to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform that recommended: „The entire regulatory framework needs to be reconsidered, and hedge funds need to be regulated within that framework.“

Frameworks for thee, but not for he, however. Under Title IV of Dodd-Frank, hedge funds were required to abide by new registration and reporting requirements in an attempt to better police systemic risk (not that the feckless Securities and Exchange Commission has ever been able to fulfill that mission). To evade the regulations, Soros and other firms have used a recently passed rule allowing so-called family offices to shield themselves from both registration and disclosure rules that would have subjected Soros Inc. to a new „Financial Stability Oversight Council.“

Soros and liberal groups seeking top election posts in battleground states WASHINGTON TIMES — A small tax-exempt political group with ties to wealthy liberals like billionaire financier George Soros has quietly helped elect 11 reform-minded progressive Democrats as secretaries of state to oversee the election process in battleground states and keep Republican „political operatives from deciding who can vote and how those votes are counted“… 

Fear this By Michael Oberndorf A little noticed story in the Washington Times last week should scare the heck out of real Americans (See previous link). George Soros, whose name should now be pretty familiar to most conservatives, is involved in a far-left scheme to elect Secretaries of State, gaining control of election machinery and thus, the outcome of elections. As many have learned, Soros is an unrepentant, apparently sociopathic fascist, who got his training from the Nazis during WWII, confiscating the property of fellow Jews who had been shipped off to the death camps. He is also the man who made billions manipulating currencies and wrecking the Malaysian and British economies.

Soros is a major source of money behind a number of radical leftist outfits, like moveon.org, the Center for American Progress, the now defunct, but reorganizing ACORN, Apollo Alliance, National Council of La Raza, Tides Foundation, Huffington Post, Southern Poverty Law Center, Soujourners, People for the American Way, Planned Parenthood, and the National Organization for Women. He is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Bilderbergs. The group in question here is the Secretaries of State Project (SSOP), formed in 2006, supposedly to „to stop Republicans from ‚manipulating‘ election results.“

Over the years, it has become clear that when the left accuses conservatives or Republicans of something, it is a sleight of hand move to cover up the fact that it is they, the left, who are doing that very thing. They have been far too successful with this strategy, having won 11 of 18 elections, including Nevada, Minnesota, and Ohio. All three states have had recent elections where fraud was obvious, or highly likely. In Nevada, Sharon Angle was slightly ahead of Harry Reid in the polls just before the election, but was defeated by an impossibly large margin, most likely, from the votes of illegal aliens. Al Franken kept „finding“ uncounted ballots that, miraculously, were all for him, and accepted by the Secretary of State. In Ohio, voter fraud was described as „massive“ and pooh-poohed by the Secretary of State. Nothing to see here, folks. Let’s just move along, now.

SSOP is anything but a grassroots, ordinary American, represent the working class organization. To give you an idea of who is behind SSOP, along with billionaire Soros, donors include furniture company heirJohn R. Hunting; computer company executive Paul Rudd; medical-supply firm heiress Pat Stryker; venture capitalist Nicholas Hanauer; ex-Clinton administration official Rob Stein; Tides Foundation founder Drummond Pike; real estate developer Robert Bowditch; charitable foundation co-chairman Scott Wallace; clothing executive Susie Tompkins Buell; real estate developer Albert Dwoskin; child psychologist Gail Furman, also chairman of the Furman Foundation, a major donor to extreme „progressive“ organizations; and Taco Bell heirRob McKay.

But wait. These are the Big Rich. Many have inherited their wealth. How can they be „progressives?“ Could it be that „progressive“ is a euphemism for „fascist?“ Indeed it could. The point here is that these enemies of freedom are extremely well funded and have systematically been working at undermining our election system for at least five years, while we have trustingly slept.

Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros ABCs Amanpour, Post VP Downie on boards of groups funded by left-wing billionaire. By Dan Gainor – First of Four Parts – When liberal investor George Soros gave $1.8 million to National Public Radio, it became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR’s federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media. Soros, who spent $27 milliontrying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC. Prominent journalists like ABC’s Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalist’s ethical code stating: „avoid all conflicts real or perceived.“ This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media.

George Soros Is REALLY George Schwartz And 10 More Terrifying Things We Learned From Glenn Beck’s Expose

IMF bank lords & George Soros‘ INET at Bretton Woods, what’s the diff? Arlen Williams – The INET Bretton Woods summit, summoned by George Soros and those who alternatively hide behind, or gather around him, has now happened. But before trying to analyze whatever we may discover of what occurred there, it is critical to discern how it fits an overall picture. For context, one must also see what the IMF and World Bank „communitarian“ elitists are up to. We find that before the Bretton Woods affair, focusing upon „new solutions,“ there was a similar IMF meeting, called „New Ideas for a New World.“ It was centered upon „Post-Crisis Policy Making“ and occurred March 7-14. That gave some of them a lot of time to communicate and plan in quiet (the traditional word for that is conspire) when they were not attending official sessions, or making videos. Then, we see that Soros‘ April 8-11 conference ended just as the IMF and World Bank took up their April 11-17 Spring Meetings, just a limo ride away. „Blossom of Spring, won’t you bloom and grow?“ Let us see what is budding in this intensive series of conferences, by the first one’s own promotional vid. Here is a collection of pitches for „New Ideas for a New World.“ Hey, they left out the last word, „Order.“ Could it be that some of them know their version of order requires fomenting massive disorder first, the crises not to be wasted? They also left out the word „Brave,“ before „New World.“ Maybe that is because some of them like Huxley, have qualms. This video puts their dexterous foot forward about that March 2011 conference, while their sinister footfalls go on. So who are these dudes, getting together and yukking it up (well, three out of four globalist manipulators seem to approve) and just how spooky are they? What are the messages of the Big Money priests, to the unwashed, PITI-ful masses of principal, interest, taxes, and insurance payers?

Unreported Soros Event Aims to Remake Entire Global Economy Left-wing billionaire’s own experts dominate quiet push for ‚a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order.‘ By Dan Gainor – Two years ago, George Soros said he wanted to reorganize the entire global economic system. In two short weeks, he is going to start – and no one seems to have noticed. On April 8, a group he’s funded with $50 million is holding a major economic conference and Soros’s goal for such an event is to „establish new international rules“ and „reform the currency system.“ It’s all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for „a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order.“ The event is bringing together „more than 200 academic, business and government policy thought leaders‘ to repeat the famed 1944 Bretton Woods gathering that helped create the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Soros wants a new ‚multilateral system,“ or an economic system where America isn’t so dominant.

George Soros assault on U.S. Constitution See which White House officials involved in rewriting nation’s founding document By Aaron Klein – At least three White House advisers and officials, including President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, have ties to an effort funded by billionaire George Soros to push for a new, „progressive“ U.S. Constitution. …Now it has emerged that Sunstein has maintained extensive ties to Soros‘ funding, particularly with regard to a movement that openly seeks to create a „progressive“ consensus as to what the U.S. Constitution should provide for by the year 2020. Also, Attorney General Eric Holder sat on the board of a Soros-funded group pushing the same „progressive“ constitution. …WND has learned that in April 2005, Sunstein opened up a conference at Yale Law School entitled, „The Constitution in 2020,“ which sought to change the nature and interpretation of the Constitution by that year. That event was sponsored by Soros‘ Open Society Institute as well as by the Center for American Progress, which is led by John Podesta, who served as co-chair of Obama’s presidential transition team. Podesta’s Center is said to be highly influential in helping to craft White House policy. The Yale event on the Constitution was also sponsored by the American Constitution Society, or ACS, which has been described as a group meant to counter the work of the Federalist Society, which has been at the forefront of the push for a more conservative judiciary since its launch in 1982. The ACS is the main organization behind the movement to ensure a more „progressive“ constitution, having received more that $2,201,500 from Soros‘ Open Society since 2002. Attorney General Holder served on the ACS board of directors.

Soros fingerprints on Mideast chaos Billionaire tied to opposition leader, funded groups opposing U.S. allies Philanthropist billionaire George Soros has funded opposition organizations in Egypt and throughout the Middle East, where anti-regime chaos has already toppled the pro-Western leader of Tunisia and is threatening the rule of President Hosni Mubarak, a key U.S. ally. Mohamed ElBaradei, one of the main opposition leaders in Egypt, has also sat on the board of an international „crisis management“ group alongside Soros and other personalities who champion dialogue with Hamas, a violent offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood, which seeks to spread Islam around the world in part by first creating an Islamic caliphate in Egypt, now backs ElBaradai, who has defended the group in the news media the last few weeks.

‚Citizen Soros‘ now targeting messenger Report documents move by ‚radical philanthropist‘ to control message For someone who once described himself as „some kind of god“ and said that makes him feel comfortable, the scrutiny of a new report that looks into his increasing influence over the messengers in today’s world probably won’t have a personal impact. But whether it affects him or not, octogenarian billionaire George Soros‘ funding of a media „monitor“ that routinely attacks traditional and conservative media is becoming a focal point. The report by Matthew Vadum, editor of Organization Trends, is scheduled to be released by the Capital Research Center in January. …“With a straight face he told reporters, ‚It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out,’“ Vadum continued, citing Soros‘ comments from 1993. It is the second major look at Soros since the election. The monthly Whistleblower magazine looked at the „evil emperor“ the Empire’s shadowy and malevolent puppet-master“ in its December issue. The edition illuminated the heart and soul of the mysterious leftwing transformer of societies, revealing how he creates and financially sustains scores of influential and shockingly anti-American organizations, and seems dedicated to converting America into a European-style, government-controlled, socialist state. Vadum’s report documents how for a long time Soros‘ has been buying up media properties and funding „left-leaning“ websites and groups, many of which try to keep their ties hidden.

George Soros video: having fun subverting nations Arlen Williams – George Soros: again from the voracious Mouth of Soros, this time „god“ describes how he has had „a lot of fun“ subverting governments and „disrupting“ regimes deemed by god’s Marxist mind, „repressive.“ Shucks, inevitably, folks are hurt, he says. But, „unintended,“ George? Reeealyy?

Report: Soros spent millions to ‚undermine‘ judiciary Campaign sought ‚commissions‘ that avoided public input on candidates for judgeships By Bob Unruh 2010 WorldNetDaily – Radical progressive billionaire George Soros has spent some $45 million in recent years on efforts to take away power from voters to select judges, a new report released today by the American Justice Partnership reveals.  The report by attorney Colleen Pero was introduced at an event held by the Heritage Foundation. It identified $45 million spent by Soros, who funds a large range of left-wing action groups, to „remake the judiciary and fundamentally change the way judges are selected in the United States.“ „This movement to end citizen participation in state judicial elections has been moving swiftly and silently, below the radar of the citizens who would be impacted by Mr. Soros‘ millions,“ said Pero in a statement about her report, „and it was time to bring this effort to the public’s attention.“

Billionaire Soros Donates $100 Million to Anti-Family, Anti-Faith Group Billionaire liberal activist George Soros announced today that he plans to donate $100 million to Human Rights Watch (HRW) a „non-partisan, watch dog“ organization that purports to alert the United Nations on human rights abuses.

Liberals Form Tea Party Tracking Website, Plan 10/2 Rally at National Mall, UPDATE: George Soros Fingerprints  Soros and the foundation left have launched a website designed to go after the growing Tea Party movement. Teapartytracker.org will post video interviews and blog entries gathered by folks on the false left who never grow weary of demonstrating their outrage over the very idea of a grassroots political effort overthrowing establishment Democrats and Republicans in the district of corporate criminals. Teapartytracker.org will be sponsored by the NAACP, Think Progress, New Left Media and Media Matters for America. Think Progress is a George Soros operation connected to John Podesta’s Center for American Progress. Podesta is Clinton’s former chief of staff. Media Matters for America is the brainchild of a MoveOn consultant and Podesta’s Center for American Progress. Soros is a major supporter of MoveOn.

Soroswood: The Intersection of Politics and Hollywood Propaganda, Part 1 & Soroswood: The Intersection of Politics and Hollywood Propaganda, Part 2 – An important expose of George Soros, in two parts. In case you didn’t know, Chelsea Clinton’s wedding was held at the estate of Soros‘ daughter. This series shows how Soros took over Hollywood in the early 90s and undermined the conservative Democrats in a series of moves that included helping to get the McCain-Feingold bill passed to limit campaign funds (e.g., free speech).

Evangelical Left Icon Jim Wallis Finally Admits to Dollars from Billionaire Leftist George Soros

A George Soros-funded, Marxist-founded organization with close ties to the White House has urged the Federal Communications Commission to investigate talk radio and cable news for „hate speech.“ The organization, calling itself Free Press, claims media companies are engaging in „hate speech“ because a disproportionate number of radio and cable-news networks are owned by non-minorities.

Soros-funded group urges media run by government Marxist-led study has close ties to Obama White House officials

Soros manipulates euro – is U.S. dollar next? Jerome Corsi suspects left-wing billionaire George Soros is trying to manipulate the euro as part of his goal of establishing a one-world currency and a one-world government.

Fact ##45: It’s a Liberal White House, by George! In 2003, billionaire George Soros came up with the idea to form a liberal alternative to the conservative Heritage Foundation. While the Leftist staffed the Center for American Progress (CAP) with former Clinton administration employees, they have heavy influence with the Obama administration, including a role in guiding the Obama transition team and loaning out staff to join President Obama’s administration. At least one of CAP’s employees was so controversial that he was compelled to step down: Van Jones, President Obama’s nominee for „green czar,“ had close ties to Marxist and other radical groups and theories. After leaving the administration, Mr. Jones rejoined CAP. Former Sen. Tom Daschle, a lobbyist on the staff of CAP, was in line to become President Obama’s Secretary of Health and Human Services but withdrew his name after records showed he was negligent in his taxes. After returning to the lobbying world, Sen. Daschle continued to adviseWhite House and congressional leaders on the issue of health care–despite the conflict of interest.

George Soros-funded left-wing propaganda attack group targetingMassResistance in attempt to defend ’safe schools‘ czar Kevin Jennings.

A major left-wing propaganda attack group funded by billionaire George Soros has begun aggressively targeting MassResistance because of our exposure of Kevin Jennings, Obama’s „safe-schools“ czar and his activities pushing homosexuality on schoolchildren.

Media Matters is headed by David Brock, an ex-conservative writer (and „out“ homosexual) who now professes his hatred for conservatism and conservatives. Media Matters has a large staff and millions of dollars per year in funding.

The group’s purported mission is to be a „rapid-response“ site that „informs“ the mainstream media on bias. But more precisely, Media Matters‘ true mission is to viciously discredit any non-liberal discourse with a flood of distortions, rumors, and outright lies. Their targets have ranged from Fox News to conservative news reporters and radio commentators.

How vicious and deceptive is Media Matters?Watch this powerfulO’Reilly Factor Fox News report about them:CLICK HERE for VIDEO  

More videos about Media Matters:

     VIDEO: O’Reilly: Media Matters is far-left & an assassination site

     VIDEO: Glenn Beck on Media Matters

George Soros launches a $50 million effort to purge economics of its free-market zeal. Michael Hirsh October 27, 2009
 

Soros: Republic Enemy #1 Jim O’Neill – „The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.“ –George Soros 

„George Soros is an evil man. He’s anti-God, anti-family, anti-American, and anti-good.“ —Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson

…What we have in Soros, is a multi-billionaire atheist, with skewed moral values, and a sociopath’s lack of conscience.  He considers himself to be a world class philosopher, despises capitalism, and just loves social engineering. 

…A blog you might want to keep an eye on is SorosWatch.com.  This is their mission: „This blog is dedicated to all who have suffered due to the ruthless financial pursuits of George Soros. Your stories are many and varied, but the theme is the same:  the destructive power of greed without conscience. We pledge to tirelessly watch Soros wherever he goes and to print the truth in the hope that he will one day stop preying upon the world’s poor that justice will be served.

Gyrgy Schwartz, better known to the world as George Soros, was born August 12, 1930 in Hungary.  Soros father, Tivadar, was a fervent practitioner of Esperanto a language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity.

…In 1956 Soros moved to New York City, where he worked on Wall Street, and started amassing his fortune.  He specialized in hedge funds and currency speculation.

Soros is absolutely ruthless, amoral, and clever in his business dealings, and quickly made his fortune.  By the 1980s he was well on his way to becoming the global powerhouse that he is today.

In an article Kyle-Anne Shiver wrote for The American Thinker she says, „Soros made his first billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets, and became known as the man who broke the Bank of England.  He broke it on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes severely devalued and their life savings cut drastically almost overnight.“

…Back to America.  Soros has been actively working to destroy America from the inside out for some years now.  People have been warning us.  Two years ago Bill O’Reilly said on The O’Reilly Factor that Soros [is] an extremist who wants open borders, a one-world foreign policy, legalized drugs, euthanasia, and on and on. This is off-the-chart dangerous. (Source) In 1997 Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote, Soros uses his philanthropy to change or more accurately deconstruct the moral values and attitudes of the Western world, and particularly of the American people. 

His Open Society is not about freedom; it is about license. His vision rejects the notion of ordered liberty, in favor of an ideology of rights and entitlements. Perhaps the most important of these whistle blowers are David Horowitz and Richard Poe.  Their book The Shadow Party outlines in detail how Soros hijacked the Democratic Party, and now owns it lock, stock, and barrel. 

Soros has been packing the Democratic Party with radicals, and ousting moderate Democrats for years.  I don’t have time to do the subject justice in this article, but Jamie Glazov of FrontPage has anexcellent interview with Richard Poe, which will fill you in on many of the facts. The Shadow Party became the Shadow Government, which became the Obama Administration.

…When the Democrats and Republicans held their conventions in 2000, Soros held Shadow Party conventions in the same cities, at the same time.  Republican Senator John McCain was the keynote speaker at the Soros Convention (so labeled by the late Robert Novak) in Philadelphia. Soros has dirtied both sides of the aisle, trust me.  And if that weren’t bad enough, he has long held connections with the CIA.

…Some of the many NGOs (None Government Organizations) that Soros funds with his billions are: MoveOn.org, the Apollo Alliance, Media Matters for America, the Tides Foundation, the ACLU, ACORN, PDIA (Project on Death In America), La Raza, and many more.  For a more complete list, with brief descriptions of the NGOs, go toDiscoverTheNetworks.orgPoe continues, Through his global web of Open Society Institutes and Open Society Foundations, Soros has spent 25 years recruiting, training, indoctrinating and installing a network of loyal operatives in 50 countries, placing them in positions of influence and power in media, government, finance and academia.

The George Soros Network – Discover The Networks.org – George Soros is one of the most powerful men on earth. A New York hedge fund manager, he has amassed a personal fortune estimated at about $7.2 billion. His management company controls billions more in investor assets. Since 1979, his foundation network — whose flagship is the Open Society Institute (OSI) — has dispensed an estimated $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. According to Richard Poe, co-author (with David Horowitz) of the 2006 book The Shadow Party: „The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is … George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control. … It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times, and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit.

George Soros Funding New Liberal Advocacy Group(2/10/2008)Billionaire financier George Soros is contributing $2.5 million to a new political organization that promotes Democratic causes in the 2008 elections. A year-end campaign report filed with the IRS and uncovered by The New York Times confirmed an earlier Newsmax report disclosing that the group, Fund for America, was organized by Taco Bell heir Rob McKay, former Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, and Anna Burger of the Service Employees International Union. The SEIU matched Soros contribution. Newsmax reported in November that the liberal activists had joined forces to form the so-called 527 group named for a section of the tax code that allows such an organization to attempt to influence elections as long as it discloses donors and expenses. Fund for America is expected to air television ads and take other political action designed to help Democrats win the White House and retain control of Congress, Andrew Malcolm of the Los Angeles Times reported. The organization will also focus on direct mail and door-to-door canvassing.

There Goes the Neighborhood The heartland is poised to get some religious heartburn, courtesy of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and mega-donor George Soros. The organization best known for suing its way to Christian suppression has its eyes on some prime conservative real estate in its $335 million local expansion. Knowing that the biggest battles may soon be fought on the smallest scales, these agents of social injustice plan to „build a civil liberties infrastructure in the middle of the country,“ bringing with it a radical agenda of homosexual rights, unlimited abortion, the extinction of the traditional family, and secularism. Hoping to add new offices in the battleground states of Michigan, Texas, Florida, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, and Tennessee, the ACLU has already raised the majority of the funding needed to accomplish its national campaign. With overflowing bank accounts, taxpayer dollars from attorney fees in Establishment Clause cases, and offices in key red states, the ACLU will be a formidable force. The organization’s executive director, Anthony Romero, wasn’t coy about the far Left’s intent. „If Republicans lose control of Congress and the White House, we can be sure the religious right will be much more active on the state level–our work will be critical there.“ By „our work,“ Romero must have been referring to the ACLU’s efforts to persecute Christians and bully Americans into abandoning their moral beliefs. Now that Soros aims on bringing legal intimidation to our backyards, it is vital that we respond by stepping up our efforts.

George Soros „Progressive Media USA“ connections.

American Axis of Evil – Friday , April 11, 2008 By Bill O’Reilly – That is the subject of this evening’s „Talking Points Memo.“ According to some excellent reporting by Politico.com, a rather frightening meeting took place here in New York City two nights ago. Billionaire far-left zealot George Soros had a dinner in his Manhattan home that included Clinton confidante Paul Begala and the vicious character assassin David Brock, who runs Media Matters. Apparently, these three are starting an organization called Progressive Media USA. Now as we reported last week, a number of organizations are set up to attack John McCain, including this new Progressive Media deal. As much as $350 million could be spent vilifying McCain. I believe this is evil. There are two ironies here. First, the Swift Boat deal back in 2004 where some conservatives hammered John Kerry is the model for the Soros smear machine. And second, if not for the McCain-Feingold law, which led to the creation of these vile MoveOn type organizations, McCain might not have to deal with this garbage.  Memo to everybody: Be careful what you wish for. As I wrote extensively in my book „Culture Warrior,“ George Soros wants to buy America, and he is close. Years ago, Soros helped create MoveOn, and now it is a major fundraiser for Barack Obama. Hired character assassin Brock makes hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Who pays his salary? We’ll look at this flow chart. Soros distributed big money to a variety of far-left outfits. And then the cash, some of it anyway, flows into Brock’s organization Media Matters. Things are set up this way so Soros can say he does not directly fund the vicious media site. Same thing with the new Progressive Media USA outfit. Because it’s a 501(c)(4) for non-profit group, donors can be kept secret. Thus, Soros can spend as much cash as he wants to smear McCain, and nobody will know about it. This, ladies and gentlemen, is ultra dangerous. Most Americans have no idea who Soros or Brock are. They will only know what they see on TV, smear stuff against McCain. And the pipeline extends directly to NBC News, which will publicize every piece of slime Brock can create. Only one word describes this: despicable. Barack Obama and John McCain have both said they don’t want a dirty campaign, but they can do nothing to stop Soros. He has the power here. It’d be nice if Senators Obama and McCain denounce Soros and Brock, but I’m not counting on that. Also, Politico and others are reporting that Obama has an association with two former far-left radicals, William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn. They are members of the Weather Underground, a violent 1960s protest group. They now teach college in Chicago, and apparently the senator has socialized with them. So all in all, the radical left is playing a role in the next presidential election. And we will keep a close eye on this situation for you. And that’s „The Memo.“

George Soros and the „Mainstream Media“ connections.

The O’Reilly Factor – FOXnews „The Factor has been investigating far-left billionaire George Soros, a man who wants to impose a radical left agenda on America. Soros has set up a complicated political operation designed to do two things – buy  influence among some liberal politicians and smear people with whom he disagrees. Most of Soros‘ political money flows through his ‚Open Society Institute,‘ which has given nearly $20 million to the ‚Tides Foundation.‘ Tides, in turn, has donated millions to the vile propaganda outfit ‚Media Matters,‘ which specializes in distorting comments made by politicians, pundits and media people. ‚Media Matters‘ directly feeds its propaganda to some mainstream media people, including elements at NBC News, columnists Frank Rich and Paul Krugman at the New York Times, columnist Jonathan Alter at Newsweek, and Bill Moyers at PBS. The goal of Soros and other radical financiers is to buy a presidential election. In the past, big business has been accused of doing just that. Now it is the likes of George Soros, an extremist who wants open borders, a one-world foreign policy, legalized drugs, euthanasia, and on and on. This is off-the-chart dangerous, but completely legal under the McCain-Feingold Act. In the weeks to come we’ll have more on Soros and his operations, including naming more of the mainstream media who are actively helping him.“

O’Reilly: Media Matters and Soros Funding (NewsMax.com)  The war of words between Fox News Bill O’Reilly and the left-wing Web site Media Matters for America has heated up, with O’Reilly accusing the site of lying about funding from Bush-bashing financier George Soros. On April 24, O’Reilly told viewers of The O’Reilly Factor that Soros and several other wealthy radicals were helping to fund Media Matters which says it is dedicated to correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media by donating money to a foundation that in turn contributed to the Web site. Media Matters countered that while Soros Open Society Institute (OSI) did contribute to the foundation, the Tides foundation, and Tides gave Media Matters more than $1 million in 2005, the OSI funds were specifically earmarked for two other beneficiaries. Soros has never given money to Media Matters, either directly or through another organization, the Web site stated. On April 26, O’Reilly responded: „The vile Media Matters outfit is denying receiving funding from any of George Soros outfits,“ he told viewers. Well, that is a total lie. As we laid out for you, the smear Web site received more than a million dollars from the Tides Foundation alone in 2005, and just by coincidence, Soros Open Society Institute donated more than a million dollars to Tides in 2005. Figure it out. Media Matters has featured a number of articles critical of O’Reilly on its Web site.

A Sight for ‚Soros‘ Eyes (Family Research Council Washington Update February 5, 2007)

The same man who said he „chose America as his home because he values freedom and democracy“ has likened our country to Nazi Germany. George Soros, the financial backbone of radical liberals like Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), told reporters this weekend that „America needs to follow the policies it has introduced in Germany. We have to go through a certain deNazification process.“ Despite the fact that these comments were made to the press corps, the media has largely ignored them. Only the New Republicfires back, condemning Soros for comparing President Bush to Hilter. „Characterizing the U.S. under Bush as Nazi…casts a shadow over U.S. politics.“ Soros has endorsed Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL).), but has also said he could support Hillary Clinton (D-NY). New Republic board member Martin Peretz ends his account of what he calls „The Madness of King George“ with tough question for these two presidential candidates. „How,“ Peretz writes, „without any explanation or apology from [Soros], will you take this man’s money?“ Additional Resources Tyran-a-Soros

The madness of King George – Jacob Laksin – If putting one’s foot in one’s mouth were a lucrative enterprise, George Soros would be worth far more than his current $8.5 billion. While bashing the Iraq war for the benefit of reporters at this year’s World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the Hungarian-born Soros, a Holocaust survivor, unburdened himself of the view that the Nazis were once more in charge. Only now they were running the United States. „America needs to follow the policies it has introduced in Germany,“ Soros explained. „We have to go through a certain de-Nazification process.“ Lest there be doubts that Soros was actually likening his adoptive country to the Third Reich and the Bush administration to the Nazi nomenklatura, a Soros spokesman, Michael Vachon, moved quickly to dispel them. „There is nothing unpatriotic about demanding accountability from the president,“ he said of Soros’s appeal for de-Nazification . . . [Click for more]

Did you know?

George Soros help pay for Lynne Stewart’s defense? According to FoxNews – The O’Reilly Factor (Oct. 16, 2006), Soros gave $20,000 to the lawyer of Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahmed, the convicted plotter of the 1991 WTC bombing. Lynne Stewart was subsequently convicted on terror charges for taking a message from Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahmed to his terror group which encouraged them to proceed to commit other terrorist attacks.

George Soros Quotes

„The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat.“ February 1997

„The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.“ June 2006

„The separation of church and state, the bedrock of our democracy, is clearly undermined by having a born-again President.“ October 18, 2004

Hillary Clinton, on June 3, 2004 said: „I have known George Soros for a long time now… We need people like George Soros, who is fearless, and willing to step up when it counts.“

David Horowitz and Richard Poe address the radical agenda of George Soros and secular liberals in their book The Shadow Party

George Soros

George Soros is Pure Evil By Michael Illions – Any success on the part of the Democrats in the upcoming election can be traced to one man. The DNC, John Kerry and the Presidency of the United States itself will be beholden to this man. If you connect the dots and fill in the blanks, if you follow the cash and the funding of the major Liberal 527 groups, you come to George Soros. Soros, the Hungarian born billionaire, was responsible for the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 and was dubbed the „man who broke the bank of England“ in 1992. Further controversial business deals, it was ruled in 2002 that Soros was involved in insider trading during a French bank takeover bid in 1988. While admitting no wrongdoing, Soros was fined $2,000,000 for his part.

Soros Loser“ is a FREE book about George Soros by RightMarch.com founder and president Dr. William Greene. This book is available TODAY as a FREE download! Get it, read it and tell everyone you know. You can download this startling book, and forward it to others, for FREE athttp://www.rightmarch.com/media/SorosLoser.pdf .

George Soros Social Agenda for America: Drug Legalization, Euthanasia, Immigrant Entitlements and Feminism by Neil Hrab

Summary: The February issue of Foundation Watch examined the philanthropy of the billionaire financier George Soros. It found that Soros-funded groups supported increased government spending and tax increases, and opposed the death penalty and President Bush’s judicial nominees. In this article author Neil Hrab looks at Soros grants in four other policy areas: drug legalization, euthanasia, immigrant entitlements, and feminist organizing. View the full version in PDF Format

Soros: Bush’s War on Terror Worse Than 9/11 Leftist tycoon George Soros compares President Bush’s new doctrine to fight terrorism with fascism. Is Soros guilty of the same vice he accuses the president of: trying to impose his „point of view on the world“?

Gillespie Decries Soros‘ Anti-American ‚Hatred‘

Read Richard Poe’s Expose of Soros‘ Coup

David Walters – Powered by InJesus
Subscribe    Unsubscribe    Change E-mail    View ArchiveURGENT -PLEASE PRAY FOR THIS MAN –
Kathie and David
May 16, 2004

PLease – urgent. I feel we should pray for this man, George Soros. One of the wealthiest man in the world. I prayed this morning and I saw the Lord shut him up in tall cupbOard but I am not sure what that means. He has billions but what if he lost his sight or he was crippled? What then? Pray and ask the Holy Spirit to show you what to pray. After my little article about him here, there is a short article from the Washington Post: I am going to UK Tuesday for Davids moms 100th birthday and I am ministering in Sarah Trinder’s church in Wales next Sat/Sunday and then Savannah week-end 28-30th.- Subject: GEORGE SOROS 
FIND OUT ABOUT GEORGE SOROS –

I went and read some articles -George Soros, HUngarian JewISH multi Billioniare, has set his money and influence to oust President Bush. He funded the legalizing of drugs in CA – I think he started off meaning well, had a vision for an open society- he meant not controlled like Nazism or Comunism which he lived under. But he had found that over the years that he can control governments by giving money and dealing in the currencies, and impose his own system, not directly but indirectly through supporting big time the groups that he agrees with and who will speak for him- kinda like puppets. He helped legalize drugs in CA. He did make about 2 billion in one week- by betting against the English pound, He became known as „the man who broke the Bank of England.“ But God can cause him to unmake ( lose) that same amount in a day. We are all only kept by the grace of God. I think he sees Bush as being totalitarian because of his Christian beliefs and he sees that as what he escaped from – he sees it as the same thing. One group imposing their view on another – and forcing it where they can. Because he has really helped nations like Russia etc. he sees himself as a kind of self appointed savior, messiah, and he said as much. He gave $50 million in 1992 to alleviate suffering in Bosnia and gave $350 million in 1995 to help Russia . In fact he had a lot to do with the bringing down of commmunism. He has given $15.5 million so far to oust President Bush and his aim is to give $400 million a year to bring about his agenda’s in America-He has has said he will give everything he has if he could make sure that George Bush doesn’t get in again. But understand where he’s coming from. He believes that Christianity is intolerant ( which it is, when it to comes to false religions and anti-God agenda’s). He wants the world God free as he equates religion with control and suffering. Remember he doesn’t understand what Christianity is so he is ignorant. I really believe he thinks he is helping the world be free, Pray for him and get others to pray for him – very important. He will not donate to any Jewish organization, although he is a Hungarian Jew and does not like his brethren in Israel. Pray about it and see what the Lord shows you about George Soros. He nearly caused Malaysia banks to collapse by wheeling and dealing in the currency market. The Malaysian PM hates him. He has a great ability to see where the currencies of the nations are going and so makes most of his money buying and converting and selling currencies. When you fight something really hard like he fought against „control“ in the form of Nazism and Communism, you get entagled in that spirit and then it takes you over too. I dont think that George Soros realizes that the thing that he fought so hard against has taken over him. Article: Washington Post — George Soros, one of the world’s richest men, has given away nearly $5 billion to promote democracy in the former Soviet bloc, Africa and Asia. Now he has a new project: defeating President Bush. „It is the central focus of my life,“ Soros said, his blue eyes settled on an unseen target. The 2004 presidential race, he said in an interview, is „a matter of life and death.“ Soros, who has financed efforts to promote open societies in more than 50 countries around the world, is bringing the fight home, he said. On Monday, he and a partner committed up to $5 million to MoveOn.org, a liberal activist group, bringing to $15.5 million the total of his personal contributions to oust Bush.

Overnight, Soros, 74, has become the major financial player of the left. He has elicited cries of foul play from the right. And with a tight nod, he pledged: „If necessary, I would give more money.“ „America, under Bush, is a danger to the world,“ Soros said. Then he smiled: „And I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is.“

Soros believes that a „supremacist ideology“ guides this White House. He hears echoes in its rhetoric of his childhood in occupied Hungary. „When I hear Bush say, ‚You’re either with us or against us,‘ it reminds me of the Germans.“ It conjures up memories, he said, of Nazi slogans on the walls, Der Feind Hort mit („The enemy is listening“). „My experiences under Nazi and Soviet rule have sensitized me,“ he said in a soft Hungarian accent.

Soros’s contributions are filling a gap in Democratic Party finances that opened after the restrictions in the 2002 McCain-Feingold law took effect. In the past, political parties paid a large share of television and get-out-the-vote costs with unregulated „soft money“ contributions from corporations, unions and rich individuals. The parties are now barred from accepting such money. But non-party groups in both camps are stepping in, accepting soft money and taking over voter mobilization. „It’s incredibly ironic that George Soros is trying to create a more open society by using an unregulated, under-the-radar-screen, shadowy, soft-money group to do it,“ Republican National Committee spokeswoman Christine Iverson said. „George Soros has purchased the Democratic Party.“

In past election cycles, Soros contributed relatively modest sums. In 2000, his aide said, he gave $122,000, mostly to Democratic causes and candidates. But recently, Soros has grown alarmed at the influence of neoconservatives, whom he calls „a bunch of extremists guided by a crude form of social Darwinism.“

Neoconservatives, Soros said, are exploiting the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to promote a preexisting agenda of preemptive war and world dominion. „Bush feels that on September 11th he was anointed by God,“ Soros said. „He’s leading the U.S. and the world toward a vicious circle of escalating violence.“

Soros said he had been waking at 3 a.m., his thoughts shaking him „like an alarm clock.“ Sitting in his robe, he wrote his ideas down, longhand, on a stack of pads. In January, PublicAffairs will publish them as a book, „The Bubble of American Supremacy“ (an excerpt appears in December’s Atlantic Monthly). In it, he argues for a collective approach to security, increased foreign aid and „preventive action.“

„It would be too immodest for a private person to set himself up against the president,“ he said. „But it is, in fact“ — he chuckled — „the Soros Doctrine.“

His campaign began last summer with the help of Morton H. Halperin, a liberal think tank veteran. Soros invited Democratic strategists to his house in Southampton, Long Island, including Clinton chief of staff John D. Podesta, Jeremy Rosner, Robert Boorstin and Carl Pope.

They discussed the coming election. Standing on the back deck, the evening sun angling into their eyes, Soros took aside Steve Rosenthal, CEO of the liberal activist group America Coming Together (ACT), and Ellen Malcolm, its president. They were proposing to mobilize voters in 17 battleground states. Soros told them he would give ACT $10 million.

Asked about his moment in the sun, Rosenthal deadpanned: „We were disappointed. We thought a guy like George Soros could do more.“ Then he laughed. „No, kidding! It was thrilling. It was like getting his Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval.“ „They were ready to kiss me,“ Soros quipped.

Before coffee the next morning, his friend Peter Lewis, chairman of the Progressive Corp., had pledged $10 million to ACT. Rob Glaser, founder and CEO of RealNetworks, promised $2 million. Rob McKay, president of the McKay Family Foundation, gave $1 million and benefactors Lewis and Dorothy Cullman committed $500,000. Soros also promised up to $3 million to Podesta’s new think tank, the Center for American Progress.

Soros will continue to recruit wealthy donors for his campaign. Having put a lot of money into the war of ideas around the world, he has learned that „money buys talent; you can advocate more effectively.“ At his home in Westchester, N.Y., he raised $115,000 for Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean. He also supports Democratic presidential contenders Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.), retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark and Rep.> Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.). In an effort to limit Soros’s influence, the RNC sent a letter to Dean Monday, asking him to request that ACT and similar organizations follow the McCain-Feingold restrictions limiting individual contributions to $2,000. The RNC is not the only group irked by Soros. Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, which promotes changes in campaign finance, has benefited from Soros’s grants over the years. Soros has backed altering campaign finance, an aide said, donating close to $18 million over the past seven years.

„There’s some irony, given the supporting role he played in helping to end the soft money system,“ Wertheimer said. „I’m sorry that Mr. Soros has decided to put so much money into a political effort to defeat a candidate. We will be watchdogging him closely.“

An aide said Soros welcomes the scrutiny. Soros has become as rich as he has, the aide said, because he has a preternatural instinct for a good deal.

Asked whether he would trade his $7 billion fortune to unseat Bush, Soros opened his mouth. Then he closed it. The proposal hung in the air: Would he become poor to beat Bush? He said, „If someone guaranteed it.“ — 2003 The Washington Post Company

Commentary (unedited) form Hungary (Name withheld for security and protection.) — In response to your closing article about Soros,  my own  view of the man for the last thirty years is, that  he is the devil, he is SATAN  here on earth in person. He did not live  under communism. He was adopted by  the Interior minister of Hungary, so he can be saved from the german and  hungarian nacis. As an\“ adopted son\“ he accompanied the minister to the homes of desplaced jews,that was after March 19,1944. Prior to that  date hungarian jews were not taken from Hungary. Governor Horty would not allow their deportation. what ever happened to jews it happened after that date. On march 19th Hungary was invaded by German paratroopers while Mr. Horty was held \“prisoner at  the Astro- Hungarian border. When finally this evel entity left Hungary, by his own admission  he left with SIX 100 Kg sack of GOLD, that He collected  from empty jewish homes. Look at this man face carefully, you can see evel in his eyes. He did not suffer  anywhere- anytime. He only brings distruction where ever He can.Gen and Ambassador  to Hungary, Mr.Motgomary stated in his book \“ Hungary, the unwilling sattilite\“ that  if the world had reacted as bravly as did the Hungarians to save the Jews not even 10% would have vanished. Yet Hungary is labelled, pictured  and condemned as the  most evel  and  ANTISEMMETIC country in our world. Go figure. Thank you for your time.


——————————————————————————————–

Aus dieser Quelle zur weiteren Verbreitung entnommen: http://npr.news.eulu.info/2016/08/22/finanzhai-george-soros-die-welt-ist-seine-playstation

FINANZHAI GEORGE SOROS: DIE WELT IST SEINE PLAYSTATION!

Soros_obama_clinton

Selten ist er in den Schlagzeilen der ungarische  „Menschenfreund“ (Philanthrop) wie er sich selbst gerne bezeichnet. Sein Interesse dürfte jedoch weniger den Menschen selbst, als dem Vermehren seines und des Reichtums seiner Clique, gelten.  Bekannt wurde er durch seine Wette 1992, bei der er auf die Abwertung des britischen Pfunds wettete und damit um eine Milliarde Dollar reicher wurde. Er zerstörte damit den Mythos der britischen Zentralbank. Auch der Brexit bescherte ihm jede Menge Heu.

George Soros* mischt sich nur allzu gerne in fremde staatliche Angelegenheiten, sprich Politik ein.  Seine weltweit agierenden Organisationen „Open Society Foundations“ (OSF) und „Assistance Fundation“ wurden 2015 von Russland aus dem Land geworfen. OSF

Gegen Ende 2011 geiselte der Großinvestor Angela Merkel, der er die Hauptschuld an der Verschärfung der Euro-Schuldenkrise gab. Durch ihre Entscheidung, für Zahlungsausfälle nicht die Europäische Union, sondern jedes Land einzeln bürgen zu lassen, habe sie die aktuelle Krise mit ausgelöst. Ein Schelm der Böses denkt, denn am 27. September 2012 wurde der „Europäische Stabilitätsmechanismus“ (ESM) als völkerrechtlicher Vertrag gegründet. Womit Schulden eines Europäischen Mitgliedes wie zum Beispiel Griechenland vergemeinschaftet wurden.

Nicht unerwähnt darf bleiben, das die von Soros finanzierte Think Tank „European Stability Initiative“ (ESI) die deutsche Kanzlerin in der Flüchtlingsfrage berät. (ESI im EU-Transparenzregister)

Seine Wetten auf Währungen gelten mittlerweile als Attacken auf die jeweiligen Volkswirtschaften. Anfang 2016 startete er eine Wette auf den Niedergang der chinesischen Währung Yuan. Somit spekuliert er auf den Niedergang einer der größten Wirtschaftsmacht, was die chinesische Regierung so gar nicht lustig findet.

Die kürzlich gehackte Korrespondenz des Menschenfreundes offenbart nunmehr sein milliardenschweres Interesse an der Ukraine. Der Milliardär finanziert demnach fast alle Schlüsselprozesse in der Ukraine – von den Medien bis hin zur Verteidigung des Landes.

Sei es die Legalisierung von Marihuana die er tatkräftigst unterstützt damit Monsanto sein genmanipuliertes „Kraut“ legal unter die Menschheit bringt. Nebenbei bemerkt hält Soros rund 476,000 Monsanto-Aktien. Genau so würde  Soros gerne Europa von Flüchtlingen geflutet sehen . Die „Initiativen“ dieses Mannes würden Bücher füllen und doch liest man „offiziell“ zumindest bei uns so gut wie nichts über diesen alten Mann. Warum wohl?

Mit der Politik auf Du und du

soros_obama John Mc Cain mit Soros soros_proschenko
Barack Obama mit Soros
John McCain  mit Soros
Petro Prorschenko mit Soros
soros_juncker ban ki moon+soros soros_montage
Jean Claude Juncker mit Soros Ban Ki Moon, Soros und Jeffrey Sachs Es gibt nur Montagen???**

9781610394215Selbstverständlich liegt dem „Oligarchen“ auch das Wohl Europas am Herzen dem er ein Ganzes Buch mit dem Titel Die Tragödie der Europäischen Union gewidmet hat.


Die Europäische Union könnte schon bald ein Ding der Vergangenheit sein. Fremdenfeindlichkeit ist weit verbreitet und spiegelt sich häufig bei den Wahlen auf dem gesamten Kontinent. Großbritannien wird möglicherweise ein Referendum darüber abhalten, ob die Union im Gesamten aufgegeben wird. Angespornt durch die Anti-EU- Stimmung aufgrund der Euro-Krise, stehen nationale Interessen im Konflikt mit einer gemeinsamen Vision für die Zukunft Europas.

* George Soros (gebürtig Dzjchdzhe Shorash oder György SchwartzLebensrune.png 12. August 1930 in Budapest) ist ein in den USA lebender jüdischer Finanzoligarch, Spekulant und Krimineller. Er übt international erheblichen politischen Einfluß aus. Soros ist Gründer derOpen Society Foundations (OSF).

** Trotz intensiver Suche konnte kein einziges gemeinsames Bild vonAngela Merkel mit George Soros gefunden werden. Auch interessant das es kein gemeinsames Bild von George Soros mit Hunter Bidendem Sohn von US-Vizepräsident Joe Biden gibt. Soros mischt ja wir oben beschrieben mit viel Geld in der Ukraine mit und man lese und staune Hunter Biden sitzt als Direktor im ukrainischen EnergieunternehmenBurisma. Naja man wird schon wissen warum!

Seite 1: Einleitung
Seite 2: Finanziell geförderte Organisationen
Seite 3: Aktien im Depot von Soros 2015

Quellen:
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/finanzen/fonds-mehr/investor-george-soros-wettet-gegen-china-und-usa-14043382.html
http://www.hirolvaso.com/soros-merkel-juncker-es-feltunt-vader-nagyur-is-tamad-a-sotet-oldal-1449293523/
http://alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.co.at/2016/08/george-soros-muss-sofort-enteignet.html
http://www.freiewelt.net/blog/george-soros-leaks-10068203/
http://de.sputniknews.com/zeitungen/20160817/312153992/korrespondenz-milliarde-dollar-soros.html
http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2014/05/13/monsanto-will-von-marihuana-freigabe-profitieren/
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/displaylobbyist.do?id=632264216418-66

 

 

 GEORGE SOROS UND SEINE OPENSOCIETYFOUNDATIONGEFÖRDERTEN ORGANISATIONEN

Der obere Teil dieser Seite widmet sich Organisationen, die direktvonGeorgeSoros und seinen offenen Gesellschaften und  Stiftungen(OSF)finanziertwerden. Der untere Teil der Seite konzentriert sichaufOrganisationen die keinedirekte Finanzierung von Soros und OSF erhalten , aber Geld aus einer odermehreren Gruppen, dieOSFDirektfinanzierung bekommen.


Organisationen direkt von George Soros und seiner OpenSocietyFoundation finanziert

Folgende Organisationen, die in den letzten Jahren diedirekteFinanzierung und Unterstützung von George Soros undseineoffeneGesellschaft Stiftungen (OSF) erhalten haben.(UmfassendeProfile der einzelnen stehen im Abschnitt„Gruppen“vonDiscoverTheNetworks.org):
  • Advancement Project: This organization works to organize „communities of color“ into politically cohesive units while disseminating its leftist worldviews and values as broadly as possible by way of a sophisticated communications department.
  • Air America Radio: Now defunct, this was a self-identified „liberal“ radio network.
  • Al-Haq: This NGO produces highly politicized reports, papers, books, and legal analyses regarding alleged Israeli human-rights abuses committed against Palestinians.
  • All of Us or None: This organization seeks to change voting laws — which vary from state to state — so as to allow ex-inmates, parolees, and even current inmates to cast their ballots in political elections.
  • Alliance for Justice: Best known for its activism vis a vis the appointment of federal judges, this group consistently depicts Republican judicial nominees as „extremists.“
  • America Coming Together: Soros played a major role in creating this group, whose purpose was to coordinate and organize pro-Democrat voter-mobilization programs.
  • America Votes: Soros also played a major role in creating this group, whose get-out-the-vote campaigns targeted likely Democratic voters.
  • America’s Voice: This open-borders group seeks to promote “comprehensive” immigration reform that includes a robust agenda in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens.
  • American Bar Association Commission on Immigration Policy: This organization „opposes laws that require employers and persons providing education, health care, or other social services to verify citizenship or immigration status.“
  • American Bridge 21st Century: This Super PAC conducts opposition research designed to help Democratic political candidates defeat their Republican foes.
  • American Civil Liberties Union: This group opposes virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by the U.S. government. It supports open borders, has rushed to the defense of suspected terrorists and their abettors, and appointed former New Left terrorist Bernardine Dohrn to its Advisory Board.
  • American Constitution Society for Law and Policy: This Washington, DC-based think tank seeks to move American jurisprudence to the left by recruiting, indoctrinating, and mobilizing young law students, helping them acquire positions of power. It also provides leftist Democrats with a bully pulpit from which to denounce their political adversaries.
  • American Family Voices: This group creates and coordinates media campaigns charging Republicans with wrongdoing.
  • American Federation of Teachers: After longtime AFT President Albert Shanker died in in 1997, he was succeeded by Sandra Feldman, who slowly “re-branded” the union, allying it with some of the most powerful left-wing elements of the New Labor Movement. When Feldman died in 2004, Edward McElroy took her place, followed by Randi Weingarten in 2008. All of them kept the union on the leftward course it had adopted in its post-Shanker period.
  • American Friends Service Committee: This group views the United States as the principal cause of human suffering around the world. As such, it favors America’s unilateral disarmament, the dissolution of American borders, amnesty for illegal aliens, the abolition of the death penalty, and the repeal of the Patriot Act.
  • American Immigration Council: This non-profit organization is a prominent member of the open-borders lobby. It advocates expanded rights and amnesty for illegal aliens residing in the U.S.
  • American Immigration Law Foundation: This group supports amnesty for illegal aliens, on whose behalf it litigates against the U.S. government.
  • American Independent News Network: This organization promotes „impact journalism“ that advocates progressive change.
  • American Institute for Social Justice: AISJ’s goal is to produce skilled community organizers who can “transform poor communities” by agitating for increased government spending on city services, drug interdiction, crime prevention, housing, public-sector jobs, access to healthcare, and public schools.
  • American Library Association: This group has been an outspoken critic of the Bush administration’s War on Terror — most particularly, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, which it calls „a present danger to the constitutional rights and privacy rights of library users.“
  • The American Prospect, Inc.: This corporation trains and mentors young leftwing journalists, and organizes strategy meetings for leftist leaders.
  • Amnesty International: This organization directs a grossly disproportionate share of its criticism for human rights violations at the United States and Israel.
  • Applied Research Center: Viewing the United States as a nation where “structural racism” is deeply “embedded in the fabric of society,” ARC seeks to „build a fair and equal society“ by demanding “concrete change from our most powerful institutions.“
  • Arab American Institute Foundation: The Arab American Institute denounces the purportedly widespread civil liberties violations directed against Arab Americans in the post-9/11 period, and characterizes Israel as a brutal oppressor of the Palestinian people.
  • Aspen Institute: This organization promotes radical environmentalism and views America as a nation plagued by deep-seated “structural racism.”
  • Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now: This group conducts voter mobilization drives on behalf of leftist Democrats. These initiatives have been notoriously marred by fraud and corruption.
  • Ballot Initiative Strategy Center: This organization seeks to advance “a national progressive strategy” by means of ballot measures—state-level legislative proposals that pass successfully through a petition (“initiative”) process and are then voted upon by the public.
  • Bill of Rights Defense Committee: This group provides a detailed blueprint for activists interested in getting their local towns, cities, and even college campuses to publicly declare their opposition to the Patriot Act, and to designate themselves „Civil Liberties Safe Zones.“ The organization also came to the defense of self-described radical attorney Lynne Stewart, who was convicted in 2005 of providing material support for terrorism.
  • Black Alliance for Just Immigration: This organization seeks to create a unified movement for “social and economic justice” centered on black racial identity.
  • Blueprint North Carolina: This group seeks to “influence state policy in North Carolina so that residents of the state benefit from more progressive policies such as better access to health care, higher wages, more affordable housing, a safer, cleaner environment, and access to reproductive health services.”
  • Brennan Center for Justice: This think tank/legal activist group generates scholarly studies, mounts media campaigns, files amicus briefs, gives pro bono support to activists, and litigates test cases in pursuit of radical „change.“
  • Brookings Institution: This organization has been involved with a variety of internationalist and state-sponsored programs, including one that aspires to facilitate the establishment of a U.N.-dominated world government. Brookings Fellows have also called for additional global collaboration on trade and banking; the expansion of the Kyoto Protocol; and nationalized health insurance for children. Nine Brookings economists signed a petitionopposing President Bush’s tax cuts in 2003.
  • Campaign for America’s Future: This group supports tax hikes, socialized medicine, and a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs.
  • Campaign for Better Health Care: This organization favors a single-payer, government-run, universal health care system.
  • Campaign for Youth Justice: This organization contends that “transferring juveniles to the adult criminal-justice system leads to higher rates of recidivism, puts incarcerated and detained youth at unnecessary risk, has little deterrence value, and does not increase public safety.”
  • Campus Progress: A project of the Soros-bankrolled Center for American Progress, this group seeks to „strengthen progressive voices on college and university campuses, counter the growing influence of right-wing groups on campus, and empower new generations of progressive leaders.“
  • Casa de Maryland: This organization aggressively lobbies legislators to vote in favor of policies that promote expanded rights, including amnesty, for illegal aliens currently residing in the United States.
  • Catalist: This is a for-profit political consultancy that seeks „to help progressive organizations realize measurable increases in civic participation and electoral success by building and operating a robust national voter database of every voting-age American.“
  • Catholics for Choice: This nominally Catholic organization supports women’s right to abortion-on-demand.
  • Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good: This political nonprofit group is dedicated to generating support from the Catholic community for leftwing candidates, causes, and legislation.
  • Center for American Progress: This leftist think tank is headed by former Clinton chief of staff John Podesta, works closely with Hillary Clinton, and employs numerous former Clinton administration staffers. It is committed to „developing a long-term vision of a progressive America“ and „providing a forum to generate new progressive ideas and policy proposals.“
  • Center for Community Change: This group recruits and trains activists to spearhead leftist „political issue campaigns.“ Promoting increased funding for social welfare programs by bringing „attention to major national issues related to poverty,“ the Center bases its training programs on the techniques taught by the famed radical organizer Saul Alinsky.
  • Center for Constitutional Rights: This pro-Castro organization is a core member of the open borders lobby, has opposed virtually all post-9/11 anti-terrorism measures by the U.S. government, and alleges that American injustice provokes acts of international terrorism.
  • Center for Economic and Policy Research: This group opposed welfare reform, supports „living wage“ laws, rejects tax cuts, and consistently lauds the professed achievements of socialist regimes, most notably Venezuela.
  • Center for Reproductive Rights: CRR’s mission is to guarantee safe, affordable contraception and abortion-on-demand for all women, including adolescents. The organization has filed state and federal lawsuits demanding access to taxpayer-funded abortions (through Medicaid) for low-income women.
  • Center for Responsible Lending: This organization was a major player in the subprime mortgage crisis. According to Phil Kerpen (vice president for policy at Americans for Prosperity), CRL “sh[ook] down and harass[ed] banks into making bad loans to unqualified borrowers.” Moreover, CRL negotiated a contract enabling it to operate as a conduit of high-risk loans to Fannie Mae.
  • Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Reasoning from the premise that tax cuts generally help only the wealthy, this organization advocates greater tax expenditures on social welfare programs for low earners.
  • Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS): Aiming to redistribute wealth by way of higher taxes imposed on those whose incomes are above average, COWS contends that „it is important that state government be able to harness fair contribution from all parts of society – including corporations and the wealthy.“
  • Change America Now: Formed in December 2006, Change America Now describes itself as „an independent political organization created to educate citizens on the failed policies of the Republican Congress and to contrast that record of failure with the promise offered by a Democratic agenda.“
  • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington: This group litigates and brings ethics charges against „government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests“ and „betray the public trust.“ Almost all of its targets are Republicans.
  • Coalition for an International Criminal Court: This group seeks to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures to those of an international court.
  • Common Cause: This organization aims to bring about campaign-finance reform, pursue media reform resembling the Fairness Doctrine, and cut military budgets in favor of increased social-welfare and environmental spending.
  • Constitution Project: This organization seeks to challenge the legality of military commissions; end the detainment of „enemy combatants”; condemn government surveillance of terrorists; and limit the President’s executive privileges.
  • Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund: Defenders of Wildlife opposes oil exploration in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It condemns logging, ranching, mining, and even the use of recreational motorized vehicles as activities that are destructive to the environment.
  • Democracy Alliance: This self-described „liberal organization“ aims to raise $200 million to develop a funding clearinghouse for leftist groups. Soros is a major donor to this group.
  • Democracy 21: This group is a staunch supporter of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act.
  • Democracy Now!: Democracy Now! was created in 1996 by WBAI radio news director Amy Goodman and four partners to provide „perspectives rarely heard in the U.S. corporate-sponsored media,“ i.e., the views of radical and foreign journalists, left and labor activists, and ideological foes of capitalism.
  • Democratic Justice Fund: DJF opposes the Patriot Act and most efforts to restrict or regulate immigration into the United States — particularly from countries designated by the State Department as „terrorist nations.“
  • Democratic Party: Soros‘ funding activities are devoted largely to helping the Democratic Party solidify its power base. In a November 2003 interview, Soros stated that defeating President Bush in 2004 „is the central focus of my life“ … „a matter of life and death.“ He pledged to raise $75 million to defeat Bush, and personally donated nearly a third of that amount to anti-Bush organizations. „America under Bush,“ he said, „is a danger to the world, and I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is.“
  • Demos: This organization lobbies federal and state policymakers to “addres[s] the economic insecurity and inequality that characterize American society today”; promotes “ideas for reducing gaps in wealth, income and political influence”; and favors tax hikes for the wealthy.
  • Drum Major Institute: This group describes itself as “a non-partisan, non-profit think tank generating the ideas that fuel the progressive movement,” with the ultimate aim of persuading “policymakers and opinion-leaders” to take steps that advance its vision of “social and economic justice.”
  • Earthjustice: This group seeks to place severe restrictions on how U.S. land and waterways may be used. It opposes most mining and logging initiatives, commercial fishing businesses, and the use of motorized vehicles in undeveloped areas.
  • Economic Policy Institute: This organization believes that “government must play an active role in protecting the economically vulnerable, ensuring equal opportunity, and improving the well-being of all Americans.”
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center: This organization has been a harsh critic of the USA PATRIOT Act and has joined the American Civil Liberties Union in litigating two cases calling for the FBI „to publicly release or account for thousands of pages of information about the government’s use of PATRIOT Act powers.“
  • Ella Baker Center for Human Rights: Co-founded by the revolutionary communist Van Jones, this anti-poverty organization claims that “decades of disinvestment in our cities” — compounded by “excessive, racist policing and over-incarceration” — have “led to despair and homelessness.”
  • EMILY’s List: This political network raises money for Democratic female political candidates who support unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.
  • Energy Action Coalition: Founded in 2004, this group describes itself as “a coalition of 50 youth-led environmental and social justice groups working together to build the youth clean energy and climate movement.” For EAC, this means “dismantling oppression” according to its principles of environmental justice.
  • Equal Justice USA: This group claims that America’s criminal-justice system is plagued by “significant race and class biases,” and thus seeks to promote major reforms.
  • Fair Immigration Reform Movement: This is the open-borders arm of the Center for Community Change.
  • Faithful America: This organization promotes the redistribution of wealth, an end to enhanced interrogation procedures vis a vis prisoners-of-war, the enactment of policies to combat global warming, and the creation of a government-run heath care system.
  • Feminist Majority: Characterizing the United States as an inherently sexist nation, this group focuses on „advancing the legal, social and political equality of women with men, countering the backlash to women’s advancement, and recruiting and training young feminists to encourage future leadership for the feminist movement in the United States.“
  • Four Freedoms Fund: This organization was designed to serve as a conduit through which large foundations could fund state-based open-borders organizations more flexibly and quickly.
  • Free Exchange on Campus: This organization was created solely to oppose the efforts of one individual, David Horowitz, and his campaign to have universities adopt an „Academic Bill of Rights,“ as well as todenounce Horowitz’s 2006 book The Professors. Member organizations of FEC include Campus Progress (a project of the Center for American Progress); the American Association of University Professors; theAmerican Civil Liberties UnionPeople For the American Way; the United States Student Association; theCenter for Campus Free Speech; the American Library AssociationFree Press; and the National Association of State Public Interest Research Groups.
  • Free Press: This „media reform“ organization has worked closely with many notable leftists and such organizations as Media Matters for AmericaAir America RadioGlobal ExchangeCode PinkFairness and Accuracy in Reporting, the Revolutionary Communist PartyMother Jones magazine, and Pacifica Radio.
  • Funding Exchange: Dedicated to the concept of philanthropy as a vehicle for social change, this organization pairs leftist donors and foundations with likeminded groups and activists who are dedicated to bringing about their own version of „progressive“ change and social justice. Many of these grantees assume that American society is rife with racism, discrimination, exploitation, and inequity and needs to be overhauled via sustained education, activism, and social agitation.
  • Gamaliel Foundation: Modeling its tactics on those of the radical Sixties activist Saul Alinsky, this group takes a strong stand against current homeland security measures and immigration restrictions.
  • Gisha: Center for the Legal Protection of Freedom of Movement: This anti-Israel organization seeks to help Palestinians „exercise their right to freedom of movement.“
  • Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect: This group contends that when a state proves either unable or unwilling to protect civilians from mass atrocities occurring within its borders, it is the responsibility of the international community to intervene — peacefully if possible, but with military force if necessary.
  • Global Exchange: Established in 1988 by pro-Castro radical Medea Benjamin, this group consistently condemns America’s foreign policy, business practices, and domestic life. Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Global Exchange advised Americans to examine „the root causes of resentment against the United States in the Arab world — from our dependence on Middle Eastern oil to our biased policy towards Israel.“
  • Grantmakers Without Borders: GWB tends to be very supportive of leftist environmental, anti-war, and civil rights groups. It is also generally hostile to capitalism, which it deems one of the chief „political, economic, and social systems“ that give rise to a host of „social ills.“
  • Green For All: This group was created by Van Jones to lobby for federal climate, energy, and economic policy initiatives.
  • Health Care for America Now: This group supports a “single payer” model where the federal government would be in charge of financing and administering the entire U.S. healthcare system.
  • Human Rights Campaign: The largest „lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender“ lobbying group in the United States, HRC supports political candidates and legislation that will advance the LGBT agenda. Historically, HRC has most vigorously championed HIV/AIDS-related legislation, “hate crime” laws, the abrogation of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, and the legalization of gay marriage.
  • Human Rights First: This group supports open borders and the rights of illegal aliens; charges that the Patriot Act severely erodes Americans‘ civil liberties; has filed amicus curiae briefs on behalf of terror suspect Jose Padilla; and deplores the Guantanamo Bay detention facilities.
  • Human Rights Watch: This group directs a disproportionate share of its criticism at the United States and Israel. It opposes the death penalty in all cases, and supports open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens.
  • I’lam: This anti-Israel NGO seeks „to develop and empower the Arab media and to give voice to Palestinian issues.“
  • Immigrant Defense Project: To advance the cause of illegal immigrants, the IDP provides immigration law backup support and counseling to New York defense attorneys and others who represent or assist immigrants in criminal justice and immigration systems, as well as to immigrants themselves.
  • Immigrant Legal Resource Center: This group claims to have helped gain amnesty for some three million illegal aliens in the U.S., and in the 1980s was part of the sanctuary movement which sought to grant asylum to refugees from the failed Communist states of Central America.
  • Immigrant Workers Citizenship Project: This open-borders organization advocates mass immigration to the U.S.
  • Immigration Advocates Network: This alliance of immigrant-rights groups seeks  to “increase access to justice for low-income immigrants and strengthen the capacity of organizations serving them.”
  • Immigration Policy Center: IPC is an advocate of open borders and contends that the massive influx of illegal immigrants into America is due to U.S. government policy, since “the broken immigration system […] spurs unauthorized immigration in the first place.”
  • Independent Media Center: This Internet-based, news and events bulletin board represents an invariably leftist, anti-capitalist perspective and serves as a mouthpiece for anti-globalization/anti-America themes.
  • Independent Media Institute: IMI administers the SPIN Project (Strategic Press Information Network), which provides leftist organizations with „accessible and affordable strategic communications consulting, training, coaching, networking opportunities and concrete tools“ to help them „achieve their social justice goals.“
  • Institute for America’s Future: IAF supports socialized medicine, increased government funding for education, and the creation of an infrastructure „to ensure that the voice of the progressive majority is heard.“
  • Institute for New Economic Thinking: Seeking to create a new worldwide „economic paradigm,“ this organization is staffed by numerous individuals who favor government intervention in national economies, and who view capitalism as a flawed system.
  • Institute for Policy Studies: This think tank has long supported Communist and anti-American causes around the world. Viewing capitalism as a breeding ground for „unrestrained greed,“ IPS seeks to provide a corrective to „unrestrained markets and individualism.“ Professing an unquestioning faith in the righteousness of the United Nations, it aims to bring American foreign policy under UN control.
  • Institute for Public Accuracy: This anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Israel organization sponsored actor Sean Penn’s celebrated visit to Baghdad in 2002. It also sponsored visits to Iraq by Democratic Congressmen Nick Rahall and former Democrat Senator James Abourezk
  • Institute for Women’s Policy Research: This group views the U.S. as a nation rife with discrimination against women, and publishes research to draw attention to this alleged state of affairs. It also advocates unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, stating that „access to abortion is essential to the economic well-being of women and girls.“
  • International Crisis Group: One of this organization’s leading figures is its Mideast Director, Robert Malley, who was President Bill Clinton’s Special Assistant for Arab-Israeli Affairs. His analysis of the Mideast conflict is markedly pro-Palestinian.
  • J Street: This anti-Israel group warns that Israel’s choice to take military action to stop Hamas‘ terrorist attacks “will prove counter-productive and only deepen the cycle of violence in the region”
  • Jewish Funds for Justice: This organization views government intervention and taxpayer funding as crucial components of enlightened social policy. It seeks to redistribute wealth from Jewish donors to low-income communities “to combat the root causes of domestic economic and social injustice.” By JFJ’s reckoning, chief among those root causes are the inherently negative by-products of capitalism – most notably racism and “gross economic inequality.”
  • Joint Victory Campaign 2004: Founded by George Soros and Harold Ickes, this group was a major fundraising entity for Democrats during the 2004 election cycle. It collected contributions (including large amounts from Soros personally) and disbursed them to two other groups, America Coming Together and the Media Fund, which also worked on behalf of Democrats.
  • Justice at Stake: This coalition calls for judges to be appointed by nonpartisan, independent commissions in a process known as “merit selection,” rather than elected by the voting public.
  • LatinoJustice PRLDF: This organization supports bilingual education, the racial gerrymandering of voting districts, and expanded rights for illegal aliens.
  • Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: This group views America as an unremittingly racist nation; uses the courts to mandate race-based affirmative action preferences in business and academia; has filed briefs against the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to limit the wholesale granting of green cards and to identify potential terrorists; condemns the Patriot Act; and calls on Americans to „recognize the contribution“ of illegal aliens.
  • League of United Latin American Citizens: This group views America as a nation plagued by „an alarming increase in xenophobia and anti-Hispanic sentiment“; favors racial preferences; supports the legalization of illegal Hispanic aliens; opposes military surveillance of U.S. borders; opposes making English America’s official language; favors open borders; and rejects anti-terrorism legislation like the Patriot Act.
  • League of Women Voters Education Fund: The League supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; supports „motor-voter“ registration, which allows anyone with a driver’s license to become a voter, regardless of citizenship status; and supports tax hikes and socialized medicine.
  • League of Young Voters: This organization seeks to “empowe[r] young people nationwide” to “participate in the democratic process and create progressive political change on the local, state and national level[s].”
  • Lynne Stewart Defense Committee: IRS records indicate that Soros’s Open Society Institute made a September 2002 grant of $20,000 to this organization. Stewart was the criminal-defense attorney who was later convicted for abetting her client, the „blind sheik“ Omar Abdel Rahman, in terrorist activities connected with his Islamic Group.
  • Machsom Watch: This organization describes itself as „a movement of Israeli women, peace activists from all sectors of Israeli society, who oppose the Israeli occupation and the denial of Palestinians‘ rights to move freely in their land.“
  • MADRE: This international women’s organization deems America the world’s foremost violator of human rights. As such, it seeks to „communicat[e] the real-life impact of U.S. policies on women and families confronting violence, poverty and repression around the world,“ and to „demand alternatives to destructive U.S. policies.“ It also advocates unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.
  • Malcolm X Grassroots Movement: This group views the U.S. as a nation replete with racism and discrimination against blacks; seeks to establish an independent black nation in the southeastern United States; and demands reparations for slavery.
  • Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition: This group calls for the expansion of civil rights and liberties for illegal aliens; laments that illegal aliens in America are commonly subjected to „worker exploitation“; supports tuition-assistance programs for illegal aliens attending college; and characterizes the Patriot Act as a „very troubling“ assault on civil liberties.
  • Media Fund: Soros played a major role in creating this group, whose purpose was to conceptualize, produce, and place political ads on television, radio, print, and the Internet.
  • Media Matters for America: This organization is a „web-based, not-for-profit … progressive research and information center“ seeking to „systematically monitor a cross-section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation.“ The group works closely with the Soros-backed Center for American Progress, and is heavily funded by Democracy Alliance, of which Soros is a major financier.
  • Mercy Corps: Vis a vis the Arab-Israeli conflict, Mercy Corps places all blame for Palestinian poverty and suffering directly on Israel.
  • Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund: This group advocates open borders, free college tuition for illegal aliens, lowered educational standards to accommodate Hispanics, and voting rights for criminals. In MALDEF’s view, supporters of making English the official language of the United States are „motivated by racism and anti-immigrant sentiments,“ while advocates of sanctions against employers reliant on illegal labor seek to discriminate against „brown-skinned people.“
  • Meyer, Suozzi, English and Klein, PC: This influential defender of Big Labor is headed by Democrat operativeHarold Ickes.
  • Midwest Academy: This entity trains radical activists in the tactics of direct action, targeting, confrontation, and intimidation.
  • Migration Policy Institute: This group seeks to create „a North America with gradually disappearing border controls … with permanent migration remaining at moderate levels.“
  • Military Families Speak Out: This group ascribes the U.S. invasion of Iraq to American imperialism and lust for oil.
  • Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment: This group is the rebranded Missouri branch of the now-defunct, pro-socialist, community organization ACORN.
  • MoveOn.org: This Web-based organization supports Democratic political candidates through fundraising, advertising, and get-out-the-vote drives.
  • Ms. Foundation for Women: This group laments what it views as the widespread and enduring flaws of American society: racism, sexism, homophobia, and the violation of civil rights and liberties. It focuses its philanthropy on groups that promote affirmative action for women, unfettered access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, amnesty for illegal aliens, and big government generally.
  • NARAL Pro-Choice America: This group supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, and works to elect pro-abortion Democrats.
  • NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund: The NAACP supports racial preferences in employment and education, as well as the racial gerrymandering of voting districts. Underpinning its support for race preferences is the fervent belief that white racism in the United States remains an intractable, largely undiminished, phenomenon.
  • The Nation Institute: This nonprofit entity sponsors leftist conferences, fellowships, awards for radical activists, and journalism internships.
  • National Abortion Federation: This group opposes any restrictions on abortion at either the state or federal levels, and champions the introduction of unrestricted abortion into developing regions of the world.
  • National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty: This group was established in 1976 as the first „fully staffed national organization exclusively devoted to abolishing capital punishment.“
  • National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy: This group depicts the United States as a nation in need of dramatic structural change financed by philanthropic organizations. It overwhelmingly promotes grant-makers and grantees with leftist agendas, while criticizing their conservative counterparts.
  • National Committee for Voting Integrity: This group opposes „the implementation of proof of citizenship and photo identification requirements for eligible electors in American elections as the means of assuring election integrity.“
  • National Council for Research on Women: This group supports big government, high taxes, military spending cuts, increased social welfare spending, and the unrestricted right to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.
  • National Council of La Raza: This group lobbies for racial preferences, bilingual education, stricter hate-crime laws, mass immigration, and amnesty for illegal aliens.
  • National Council of Women’s Organizations: This group views the United States as a nation rife with injustice against girls and women. It advocates high levels of spending for social welfare programs, and supports race and gender preferences for minorities and women in business and academia.
  • National Immigration Forum: Opposing the enforcement of present immigration laws, this organization urges the American government to „legalize“ en masse all illegal aliens currently in the United States who have no criminal records, and to dramatically increase the number of visas available for those wishing to migrate to the U.S. The Forum is particularly committed to opening the borders to unskilled, low-income workers, and immediately making them eligible for welfare and social service programs.
  • National Immigration Law Center: This group seeks to win unrestricted access to government-funded social welfare programs for illegal aliens.
  • National Lawyers Guild: This group promotes open borders; seeks to weaken America’s intelligence-gathering agencies; condemns the Patriot Act as an assault on civil liberties; rejects capitalism as an unviable economic system; has rushed to the defense of convicted terrorists and their abettors; and generally opposes all U.S. foreign policy positions, just as it did during the Cold War when it sided with the Soviets.
  • National Organization for Women: This group advocates the unfettered right to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; seeks to „eradicate racism, sexism and homophobia“ from American society; attacks Christianity and traditional religious values; and supports gender-based preferences for women.
  • National Partnership for Women and Families: This organization supports race- and sex-based preferences in employment and education. It also advocates for the universal „right“ of women to undergo taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand at any stage of pregnancy and for any reason.
  • National Priorities Project: This group supports government-mandated redistribution of wealth — through higher taxes and greater expenditures on social welfare programs. NPP exhorts the government to redirect a significant portion of its military funding toward public education, universal health insurance, environmentalist projects, and welfare programs.
  • National Public Radio: Founded in 1970 with 90 public radio stations as charter members, NPR is today a loose network of more than 750 U.S. radio stations across the country, many of which are based on college and university campuses. (source)
  • National Security Archive Fund: This group collects and publishes declassified documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act to a degree that compromises American national security and the safety of intelligence agents.
  • National Women’s Law Center: This group supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; lobbies against conservative judicial appointees; advocates increased welfare spending to help low-income mothers; and favors higher taxes for the purpose of generating more funds for such government programs as Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, foster care, health care, child-support enforcement, and student loans.
  • Natural Resources Defense Council: One of the most influential environmentalist lobbying groups in the United States, the Council claims a membership of one million people.
  • New America Foundation: This organization uses policy papers, media articles, books, and educational events to influence public opinion on such topics as healthcare, environmentalism, energy policy, the Mideast conflict, global governance, and much more.
  • New Israel Fund: This organization gives support to NGOs that regularly produce reports accusing Israel of human-rights violations and religious persecution.
  • NewsCorpWatch: A project of Media Matters For America, NewsCorpWatch was established with the help of a $1 million George Soros grant to Media Matters.
  • Pacifica Foundation: This entity owns and operates Pacifica Radio, awash from its birth with the socialist-Marxist rhetoric of class warfare and hatred for capitalism.
  • Palestinian Center for Human Rights: This NGO investigates and documents what it views as Israeli human-rights violations against Palestinians.
  • Peace and Security Funders Group: This is an association of more than 60 foundations that give money to leftist anti-war and environmentalist causes. Its members tend to depict America as the world’s chief source of international conflict, environmental destruction, and economic inequalities.
  • Peace Development Fund: In PDF’s calculus, the United States needs a massive overhaul of its social and economic institutions. „Recently,“ explains PDF, „we have witnessed the negative effects of neo-liberalism and the globalization of capitalism, the de-industrialization of the U.S. and the growing gap between the rich and poor …“
  • People for the American Way: This group opposes the Patriot Act, anti-terrorism measures generally, and the allegedly growing influence of the „religious right.“
  • People Improving Communities Through Organizing: This group uses Alinsky-style organizing tactics to advance the doctrines of the religious left.
  • Physicians for Human Rights: This group is selectively and disproportionately critical of the United States and Israel in its condemnations of human rights violations.
  • Physicians for Social Responsibility: This is an anti-U.S.-military organization that also embraces the tenets of radical environmentalism.
  • Planned Parenthood: This group is the largest abortion provider in the United States and advocates taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.
  • Ploughshares Fund: This public grantmaking foundation opposes America’s development of a missile defense system, and contributes to many organizations that are highly critical of U.S. foreign policies and military ventures.
  • Prepare New York: This group supported the proposed construction of a Muslim Community Center near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan – a project known as the Cordoba Initiative, headed by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.
  • Presidential Climate Action Project: PCAP’s mission is to create a new 21st-century economy, completely carbon-free and based largely on renewable energy. A key advisor to the organization is the revolutionary communist Van Jones.
  • Prison Moratorium Project: This initiative was created in 1995 for the express purpose of working for the elimination of all prisons in the United States and the release of all inmates. Reasoning from the premise that incarceration is never an appropriate means of dealing with crime, it deems American society’s inherent inequities the root of all criminal behavior.
  • Progressive Change Campaign Committee: This organization works “to elect bold progressive candidates to federal office and to help [them] and their campaigns save money, work smarter, and win more often.”
  • Progressive States Network: PSN’s mission is to „pass progressive legislation in all fifty states by providing coordinated research and strategic advocacy tools to forward-thinking state legislators.“
  • Project Vote: This is the voter-mobilization arm of the Soros-funded ACORN. A persistent pattern of lawlessness and corruption has followed ACORN/Project Vote activities over the years.
  • Pro Publica: Claiming that “investigative journalism is at risk,” this group aims to remedy this lacuna in news publishing by “expos[ing] abuses of power and betrayals of the public trust by government, business, and other institutions, using the moral force of investigative journalism to spur reform through the sustained spotlighting of wrongdoing.”
  • Proteus Fund: This foundation directs its philanthropy toward a number of radical leftwing organizations.
  • Public Citizen Foundation: Public Citizen seeks increased government intervention and litigation against corporations — a practice founded on the notion that American corporations, like the capitalist system of which they are a part, are inherently inclined toward corruption.
  • Public Justice Center: Viewing America as a nation rife with injustice and discrimination, this organization engages in legislative and policy advocacy to promote „systemic change for the disenfranchised.“
  • Rebuild and Renew America Now (a.k.a. Unity ’09): Spearheaded byMoveOn.org and overseen by longtime activist Heather Booth, this coalition was formed to facilitate the passage of President Obama’s „historic“ $3.5 trillion budget for fiscal year 2010.
  • Res Publica: Seeking to advance far-left agendas in places all around the world, RP specializes in “E-advocacy,” or web-based movement-building.
  • Secretary of State Project: This project was launched in July 2006 as an independent „527“ organization devoted to helping Democrats get elected to the office of Secretary of State in selected swing, or battleground, states.
  • Sentencing Project: Asserting that prison-sentencing patterns are racially discriminatory, this initiative advocates voting rights for felons.
  • Social Justice Leadership: This organization seeks to transform an allegedly inequitable America into a „just society“ by means of „a renewed social-justice movement.“
  • Shadow Democratic Party: This is an elaborate network of non-profit activist groups organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources — money, get-out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising, and policy iniatives — to elect Democratic candidates and guide the Democratic Party towards the left.
  • Sojourners: This evangelical Christian ministry preaches radical leftwing politics. During the 1980s it championed Communist revolution in Central America and chastised U.S. policy-makers for their tendency „to assume the very worst about their Soviet counterparts.“ More recently, Sojourners has taken up the cause of environmental activism, opposed welfare reform as a „mean-spirited Republican agenda,“ and mounted a defense of affirmative action.
  • Southern Poverty Law Center: This organization monitors the activities of what it calls “hate groups” in the United States. It exaggerates the prevalence of white racism directed against American minorities.
  • State Voices: This coalition helps independent local activist groups in 22 states work collaboratively on a year-round basis, so as to maximize the impact of their efforts.
  • Talking Transition: This was a two-week project launched in early November 2013 to “help shape the transition” to City Hall for the newly elected Democratic mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio.
  • Think Progress: This Internet blog „pushes back, daily,“ by its own account, against its conservative targets, and seeks to transform „progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world.“
  • Thunder Road Group: This political consultancy, in whose creation Soros had a hand, coordinates strategy for the Media FundAmerica Coming Together, and America Votes.
  • Tides Foundation and Tides Center: Tides is a major funder of the radical Left.
  • U.S. Public Interest Research Group: This is an umbrella organization of student groups that support leftist agendas.
  • Universal Healthcare Action Network: This organization supports a single-payer health care system controlled by the federal government.
  • Urban Institute: This research organization favors socialized medicine, expansion of the federal welfare bureaucracy, and tax hikes for higher income-earners.
  • USAction Education Fund: USAction lists its priorities as: „fighting the right wing agenda“; „building grassroots political power“; winning „social, racial and economic justice for all“; supporting a system of taxpayer-funded socialized medicine; reversing „reckless tax cuts for millionaires and corporations“ which shield the „wealthy“ from paying their „fair share“; advocating for „pro-consumer and environmental regulation of corporate abuse“; „strengthening progressive voices on local, state and national issues“; and working to „register, educate and get out the vote … [to] help progressives get elected at all levels of government.“
  • Voto Latino: This group seeks to mobilize Latin-Americans to become registered voters and political activists.
  • We Are America Alliance: This coalition promotes “increased civic participation by immigrants” in the American political process.
  • Working Families Party: An outgrowth of the socialist New Party, WFP seeks to help push the Democratic Party toward the left.
  • World Organization Against Torture: This coalition works closely with groups that condemn Israeli security measures against Palestinian terrorism.
  • YWCA World Office, Switzerland: The YWCA opposes abstinence education; supports universal access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; and opposes school vouchers.

 

„Sekundäre“ oder „Indirekte“ Partner des George Soros Netzwerks

In addition to those organizations that are funded directly by George Soros and his Open Society Foundations (OSF), there are also numerous „secondary“ or „indirect“ affiliates of the Soros network. These include organizations which do not receive direct funding from Soros and OSF, but which are funded by one or more organizations that do.

  • Center for Progressive Leadership: Funded by the Soros-bankrolled Democracy Alliance, this anti-capitalist organization is dedicated to training future leftist political leaders.
  • John Adams Project:This project of the American Civil Liberties Union was accused of: (a) having hired investigators to photograph CIA officers thought to have been involved in enhanced interrogations of terror suspects detained in Guantanamo, and then (b) showing the photos to the attorneys of those suspects, some of whom were senior al-Qaeda operatives.
  • Moving Ideas Network (MIN): This coalition of more than 250 leftwing activist groups is a partner organization of the Soros-backed Center for American Progress. MIN was originally a project of the Soros-backed American Prospect and, as such, received indirect funding from the Open Society Institute. In early 2006, The American Prospect relinquished control of the Moving Ideas Network.
  • New Organizing Institute: Created by the Soros-funded MoveOn.org, this group „trains young, technology-enabled political organizers to work for progressive campaigns and organizations.“
  • Think Progress: This „project“ of the American Progress Action Fund, which is a „sister advocacy organization“of the Soros-funded Center for American Progress and Campus Progress, seeks to transform „progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world.“
  • Vote for Change: Coordinated by the political action committee of the Soros-funded MoveOn.org, Vote for Change was a group of 41 musicians and bands that performed concerts in several key election „battleground“states during October 2004, to raise money in support of Democrat John Kerry’s presidential bid.
  • Working Families Party: Created in 1998 to help push the Democratic Party toward the left, this front group for the Soros-funded ACORN functions as a political party that promotes ACORN-friendly candidates.

Quelle: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

George Soros ist einer der erfolgreichsten Investoren und Hedgefonds-Manager der Welt. Über seine Investmentfirma Soros Fund Management hält er Beteiligungen an zahlreichen Unternehmen. Die Daten beziehen sich auf die 13F-Liste vom zweiten Quartal 2015, die in den USA Investitionen über 100 Millionen US-Dollar dokumentiert.

Aktien von George Soros im Depot 2015

SPDR S&P 500 ETF
Im Portfolio von George Soros findet man, mit einem Anteil von 22,57 Prozent am Gesamtdepot, einen ETF, der den S&P 500abbildet. Dies ist damit seine größte Position. Die Anteile sind derzeit 2,43 Milliarden US-Dollar wert.

YPF
YPF ist aktuell Soros zweitgrößte Beteiligung. Der Investor nennt Aktien im Wert von 301,68 Millionen US-Dollar sein Eigen. Damit machen die Aktien der argentinischen Ölgesellschaft 2,80 Prozent seiner gesamten Aktienpositionen aus.

Time Warner Cable
Die drittgrößte Position im Portfolio von George Soros besteht aus Aktien des US-amerikanischen Kabel-TV-Unternehmens Time Warner Cable. Die Aktien haben einem Wert von 259,18 Millionen US-Dollar und nehmen einen Anteil von 2,41 Prozent im Portfolio ein.

Dow Chemical
Von Dow Chemical besitzt Soros Aktien im Wert von 248,69 Millionen US-Dollar. Die Aktien des am Umsatz gemessen zweitgrößten Chemiekonzerns der Welt nach BASF machen 2,31 Prozent seines Depots aus.

Adecoagro
Einen Anteil von 2,22 Prozent in Soros Depot nehmen die Aktien vonAdecoagro ein, was Platz fünf unter den größten Aktienpositionen bedeutet. Adecoagro gilt als eines der führenden Agrarunternehmen Südamerikas und besitzt neben rund 290.000 Hektar Ackerland auch mehrere Verarbeitungsanlangen in Argentinien, Brasilien und Uruguay. Soros hält derzeit Aktien im Wert von 238,94 Millionen US-Dollar.

Facebook
George Soros hat sich mit Aktien von Facebook eingedeckt. Die Aktien von Facebook machen 2,06 Prozent seines Gesamtportfolios aus und sind 222,25 Millionen US-Dollar wert.

Cypress Semiconductor
1,84 Prozent der Aktien im Portfolio von George Soros sind Aktien vonCypress Semiconductor, einem US-amerikanischen Halbleiterhersteller mit Firmensitz in San Jose, Kalifornien. Sein Anteil ist 198,35 Millionen US-Dollar wert.

eBay
Auch eBay findet sich in den Top Ten der größten Aktienpositionen des Portfolios von George Soros. Aktien im Wert von 192,71 Millionen US-Dollar entsprechen 1,79 Prozent seines gesamten Portfolios.

LyondellBasell Industries
George Soros besitzt Aktien des US-amerikanischen Kunststoff-, Chemie- und Raffinerie-Unternehmens LyondellBasell Industries. Die Beteiligung ist derzeit 184,45 Millionen US-Dollar wert und nimmt 1,71 Prozent des Gesamtportfolios ein.

Endo International
Endo International ist ein global agierendes Unternehmen aus dem Gesundheitsbereich und ist damit auch für George Soros interessant. Soros besitzt Aktien im Wert von rund 183,18 Millionen US-Dollar. Bezogen auf die Gesamtheit seiner Aktienpositionen machen die Aktien von Endo International 1,70 Prozent aus.

http://www.finanzen.net/top_ranking/top_ranking_detail.asp?inRanking=1213&inPos=1

Ergänzungen  2015

Alibaba Group
Die chinesische Alibaba Group betreibt unter anderem eine der weltweit größten Online-Handelsplattformen und hat mit Alipay ein eigenes Onlinebezahlsystem. Der Aktienanteil von Soros an dem Unternehmen hat einen Wert von rund 369,97 Millionen US-Dollar, das sind etwa 3,64 Prozent vom Portfolio.

General Motors
Soros hält Aktien in Höhe von 211,39 Millionen US-Dollar an dem US-amerikanischen Automobilherstellers General Motors. Das sind 2,08 Prozent vom gesamten Portfolio.

Zoetis
Das US-amerikanische Unternehmen ist spezialisiert auf die Herstellung von Tierarzneimittel und Impfstoffe für Haus- und Nutztiere. Der aktuelle Wert der Aktien liegt bei etwa 190,1 Millionen US-Dollar. Das macht einen Anteil von 1,87 Prozent an Soros Portfolio.

http://www.finanzen.net/top_ranking/top_ranking_detail.asp?inRanking=1213&inPos=1

 
 
 
 
 

——————————————————————————————————–

Aus dem per ÖVP-Amtsmissbräuche offenkundig verfassungswidrig agrar-ausgeraubten Tirol, vom friedlichen Widerstand, Klaus Schreiner

Don´t be part of the problem! Be part of the solution. Sei dabei! Gemeinsam sind wir stark und verändern unsere Welt! Wir sind die 99 %!

“Wer behauptet, man braucht keine Privatsphäre, weil man nichts zu verbergen hat, kann gleich sagen man braucht keine Redefreiheit weil man nichts zu sagen hat.“ Edward Snowden

banner (4)

 

Der amerikanische militärisch-industrielle-parlamentarische-Medien-Komplex des Kriegsimperiums, das Hydra-Ungeheuer der US-Kriegspartei bei klar sehen – Eine Analyse: Hauptantriebskräfte und Ursachen vieler US-Kriege, failed states und Flüchtlingsströme

 
 

Die Systemfrage – zu den Verbrechen der NATO – Illegale NATO-Angriffskriege, illegale NATO-Regime Change´s, NATO-Terroristenbewaffnungen, NATO-Mitwirkung bei Terroranschlägen gegen die eigenen Bevölkerung, NATO-Staatsstreiche und NATO-Folter, Mitwirken bei NATO-Drohnenmassenmorden, … die NATO ist ein mafiöses verbrecherisches Angriffsbündnis! Und über die Kriegsverkäufer, die Transatlantik-Mainstreammedien & Politiker.

 
 
 

Wichtige Infos – über WAS JEDER TUN könnte – wenn er denn wollte – Schluss mit den Ausreden! Jeder kann was tun! Viele Tipps – da ist für jeden – was dabei! – Verschiedene Aktions- & Protestformen. Widerstand. Sehr viele Tipps zum (Um-)Weltverbessern; Bürgerprotesttipps, Weisheiten Gandhis u. v. m.

 
 
—————————————————————————————————————————————
 
 

Folge dem Geld US Bonds

Hier noch eine kurzes Video zur Erklärung der Grafik Gewaltspirale der US-Kriege

GRUNDLAGENWERKE zu 09/11 – die ein Aufwachen garantieren:

David Ray Griffin / Daniele Ganser

Der mysteriöse Einsturz von World Trade Center 7:

Warum der offizielle Abschlußbericht zum 11. September unwissenschaftlich und falsch ist

496 Seiten Peace Press, Berlin/Bangkok, 2017ISBN 3-86242-007-8

Bestellmöglichkeiten:- über http://www.peace-press.org oder

oliver.bommer@peace-press.org Euro 29,80 mit Luftpost –

über Amazon Euro 39,80 (inkl. Amazon-Gebühren) mit Luftpost- über jede Buchhandlung Euro 29,80 per Seeweg oder Euro 34,80 per Luftpost

Bitte teile diesen Beitrag:

Share Button

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.